UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrantþ
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto
Check the appropriate box:
o
oPreliminary Proxy Statement
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
o     Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ     Definitive Proxy Statement
o     Definitive Additional Materials
o     Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

NOBLE CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 1)(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
    
 
 
2)(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
    
 
 
3)(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
    
 
 
4)(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
    
 
 
5)(5) Total fee paid:
 
   
    
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 1)(1) Amount Previously Paid:
 
    
 
 
2)(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
    
 
(3)Filing Party:
    
 
 (4) Date Filed:
 
  3)Filing Party:
    


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS
GENERAL
4)Date Filed:VOTING SECURITIES
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Committee Report
Summary Compensation Table
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
Pension Benefits
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
AUDITORS
Report of the Audit Committee
OTHER MATTERS
ANNEX A


(NOBLE LOGO)

(NOBLE LOGO)

NOBLE CORPORATION
13135 South Dairy Ashford, Suite 800
Sugar Land, Texas 77478

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS

To Be Held On April 28, 2005

May 1, 2008

To the Members of
Noble Corporation:

          The annual general meeting of members of Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares (the “Company”), will be held on Thursday, April 28, 2005,May 1, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the St. Regis Hotel 1919 Briar Oaks Lane,Granduca, 1080 Uptown Park Boulevard, Houston, Texas, for the following purposes:

 1. To elect two directors to the class of directors whose three-year term will expire in 2008 and, subject to member adoption of the special resolution referenced in item 2 below, to elect a third director to the class of directors whose three-year term will expire in 2008;2011;
 
 2.To consider and vote upon a special resolution to amend article 54 of the Company’s articles of association to increase the director retirement age to 72 from 70;
3.  To consider and vote upon a proposal regarding the Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors;
4.  To consider and vote upon a proposal to amend the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors;
5. To approve the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for 2005;2008; and
 
 6.3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

          The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 3, 20056, 2008 as the record date for the determination of members entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual general meeting or any adjournment thereof. Only holders of record of ordinary shares of the Company at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. A complete list of such members will be available for examination at the offices of the Company in Sugar Land, Texas during normal business hours for a period of 10 days prior to the meeting.

          A record of the Company’s activities during 20042007 and financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20042007 are contained in the accompanying 20042007 Annual Report. The Annual Report does not form any part of the material for solicitation of proxies.

          Your vote is important. All members are cordially invited to attend the meeting.We urge you, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, to submit your proxy by telephone, via the Internet or by completing, signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy or voting instruction card in the postage-paid envelope provided.If a member who has submitted a proxy attends the meeting in person, such member may revoke the proxy and vote in person on all matters submitted at the meeting.
   
 
 By Order of the Board of Directors


Julie J. Robertson
Secretary
   
  Julie J. Robertson
  
Secretary

Sugar Land, Texas

March 15, 2005
24, 2008

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL
VOTING SECURITIES
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS
CLASS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRES IN 2006
CLASS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRES IN 2007
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN 2004
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN 2004
PENSION PLAN TABLE
COMPARSION OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURNS
COMPARSION OF NINETEEN-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURNS
PROPOSAL TO AMEND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION TO INCREASE DIRECTOR RETIREMENT AGE
PROPOSAL REGARDING THE NOBLE CORPORATION 1992 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
1992 PLAN
PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE NOBLE CORPORATION EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
AUDITORS
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
MEMBER PROPOSALS AND OTHER MATTERS
ANNEX A
ANNEX B
ANNEX C
ANNEX D


(NOBLE LOGO)

(NOBLE LOGO)
NOBLE CORPORATION
13135 South Dairy Ashford, Suite 800
Sugar Land, Texas 77478

PROXY STATEMENT

For Annual General Meeting of Members
To Be Held on April 28, 2005May 1, 2008

GENERAL

          This proxy statement is furnished to members of Noble Corporation (the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation by our board of directors (“Board”) of proxies for use at the annual general meeting of members to be held on Thursday, May 1, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the time and placeHotel Granduca, 1080 Uptown Park Boulevard, Houston, Texas, and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice. The approximate date of mailing of this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy or voting instruction card is March 1826, 2008.

,2005.

Proxies and Voting Instructions

          If you hold ordinary shares, par value $.10 per share, of the Company (“Ordinary Shares”) in your name, you can submit your proxy in any of the following three convenient ways:

voting methods. Please have your proxy card available when voting via either the telephone or Internet. You will be prompted to provide your unique “Control Number” for security purposes. This number will be provided on your proxy card.

  Telephone– Call toll free 1-866-437-46511-866-628-8859 (24 hours a day, seven days a week) and follow the instructions given. YouTelephone voting will need to give the Control Number set forth on your proxy card accompanying this proxy statement. This method of submitting your proxy is available for residents of the United States and Canada only, and isbe available until 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, April 27, 2005.
30, 2008.
 
  InternetVisitwww.myproxyonline.com. EnterVote on the Control Number from your proxy cardInternet atwww.proxyonline.com and follow the instructions given.on-screen instructions. This method of submitting your proxy will be available until 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, April 27, 2005.
30, 2008.
 
  Proxy Card– Complete, sign and date your proxy card and mail it in the postage-paidpostage-paid envelope provided. Proxy cards must be received by us before voting begins at the annual general meeting.

          If you hold Ordinary Shares through someone else, such as a bank, broker or other nominee, you may get material from them asking you how you want to vote your shares. You should check to see if they offer telephone or Internet voting.

          You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to its exercise by:

  Giving written notice of the revocation to our corporate secretary;
 
  Appearing and voting in person at the annual general meeting; or
 
  Properly submitting a later-dated proxy by telephone, via the Internet or by delivering a later-dated proxy card to our corporate secretary.

          If you attend the annual general meeting in person without voting, this will not automatically revoke your proxy. If you revoke your proxy during the meeting, this will not affect any vote previously taken. If you holdOrdinaryhold

1


Ordinary Shares through someone else, such as a bank, broker or other nominee, and you desire to revoke your proxy, you should follow the instructions provided by your nominee.

1


          If you were a participant in the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan on the record date for the meeting, you should receive a voting instruction card. You can provide instructions to the plan trustee as to how to vote Ordinary Shares held in the plan by calling the telephone number or visiting the Internet site as set forth above, or by completing, signing, dating and mailing the voting instruction card in the postage paidpostage-paid envelope.

Voting Procedures and Tabulation

          The Company will appoint one or more inspectors of election to act at the annual general meeting and to make a written report thereof. Prior to the annual general meeting, the inspectors will sign an oath to perform their duties in an impartial manner and according to the best of their ability. The inspectors will ascertain the number of Ordinary Shares outstanding and the voting power of each, determine the Ordinary Shares represented at the annual general meeting and the validity of proxies and ballots, count all votes and ballots, and perform certain other duties as required by law. The determination of the inspectors as to the validity of proxies will be final and binding.

          Abstentions and broker non-votes (i.e., proxies submitted by brokers that do not indicate a vote for a proposal because they do not have discretionary voting authority and have not received instructions as to how to vote on the proposal) are counted as present in determining whether the quorum requirement for the annual general meeting is satisfied. For purposes of determining the outcome of any matter to be voted upon as to which the broker has indicated on the proxy that the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote, these shares will be treated as not present at the meeting and not entitled to vote with respect to that matter, even though those shares are considered to be present at the meeting for quorum purposes and may be entitled to vote on other matters. Abstentions, on the other hand, are considered to be present at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter abstained from.

          With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from each nominee. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect. Broker non-votes and other limited proxies will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

          With regard to the proposed special resolution to amend the Company’s articles of association, the proposal regarding the Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the proposal to amend the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, and the proposal to approve the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for 2005,2008, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes and other limited proxies will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to any of such proposals.proposal.

VOTING SECURITIES

          Our only outstanding voting securities are ourthe Ordinary Shares. Only holders of record of Ordinary Shares at the close of business on March 3, 2005,6, 2008, the record date for the annual general meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual general meeting. On the record date for the annual general meeting, there were 135,569,061268,635,604 Ordinary Shares outstanding and entitled to be voted at the annual general meeting. A majority of such shares, present in person or represented by proxy, is necessary to constitute a quorum. Each Ordinary Share is entitled to one vote. Under Cayman Islands law, the holders of ourthe Ordinary Shares do not have appraisal rights with respect to matters to be voted upon at the annual general meeting.

          All Ordinary Share and per share data (including share prices) presented in this proxy statement give effect to, and have been adjusted (if necessary) to reflect, the Company’s two-for-one stock split effected in August 2007.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
MEETING OF MEMBERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 1, 2008
This proxy statement, the 2007 Annual Report, the notice of annual general meeting of members and the form of proxy card are available atwww.noblecorp.com/2008proxymaterials. Directions to attend the annual general meeting in person may also be obtained atwww.noblecorp.com/2008proxymaterials.

2


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

          The following table sets forth as of December 31, 20042007 information with respect to the only persons who were known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of ourthe outstanding Ordinary Shares.
         
  Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares  Percent of Class 
FMR Corp        
82 Devonshire Street        
Boston, Massachusetts 02109  15,786,469(1)  11.7%
         
Massachusetts Financial Services Company        
500 Boylston Street        
Boston, Massachusetts 02116  13,331,519(2)  9.8%
         
Capital Research and Management Company        
333 South Hope Street        
Los Angeles, California 90071  11,668,400(3)  8.8%
         
Franklin Resources, Inc        
One Franklin Parkway        
San Mateo, California 94403  7,262,300(4)  5.4%
         
  Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 Number of Shares Percent of Class
FMR LLC (1)  19,376,682   7.2%
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
        
         
Barclays Global Investors, NA (2)  15,703,795   5.84%
45 Fremont Street
San Francisco, California 94105
        


(1) Based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8) dated February 14, 200512) filed by FMR Corp.LLC with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). on February 14, 2008. The filing is made jointly with Edward C. Johnson 3d Abigail P. Johnson and Fidelity Management & Research Company. FMR Corp.LLC reports that it has sole investment power with respect to all such Ordinary Shares and sole voting power with respect to 1,848,0562,490,582 Ordinary Shares.
 
(2) Based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 6) dated February 3, 2005 filed by Massachusetts Financial Services Company with the SEC. Massachusetts Financial ServicesSEC on February 6, 2008 by Barclays Global Investors, NA (“Barclays”), Barclays Global Fund Advisors (“BG Fund”), Barclays Global Investors, LTD (“BGI LTD”), Barclays Global Investors Japan Trust and Banking Company Limited (“BGI Trust”), Barclays Global Investors Japan Limited (“BGI Japan”), Barclays Global Investors Canada Limited (“BGI Canada”), Barclays Global Investors Australia Limited (“BGI Australia”), and Barclays Global Investors (Deutschland) AG (“BGI Germany”). Barclays reports that it has sole investment power with respect to all such Ordinary Shares and sole voting power with respect to 12,032,0868,742,637 Ordinary Shares.
(3)Based on a Schedule 13G dated February 9, 2005 filed by Capital ResearchShares and Management Company with the SEC. The filing is made jointly with The Growth Fund of America, Inc., an investment company which is advised by Capital Research and Management Company. Capital Research and Management Company reports that it has sole investmentdispositive power with respect to all such10,422,739 Ordinary SharesShares; BG Fund reports sole voting and that The Growth Fund of America, Inc. hasdispositive power with respect to 2,894,892 Ordinary Shares; BGI LTD reports sole voting power with respect to 6,675,0001,426,636 Ordinary Shares (5.1%and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,607,743 Ordinary Shares; BGI Japan reports sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 621,694 Ordinary Shares; and BGI Canada reports sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 156,727 Ordinary Shares. Each of class).
(4)Based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 1) dated February 11, 2005 filed by Franklin Resources, Inc. withBGI Trust, BGI Australia and BGI Germany reported no beneficial ownership. The address for BG Fund is 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco, California 94105; the SEC. The filingaddress for BGI LTD is made jointly with Charles B. Johnson, Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.Murray House, 1 Royal Mint Court, London, EC3N 4HH, England; the address for BGI Trust and Templeton Global Advisors Limited. Franklin Resources, Inc. reports thatBGI Japan is Ebisu Prime Square Tower, 8th Floor, 1-1-39 Hiroo Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo, 150-0012, Japan; the Ordinary Shares indicated are beneficially owned by one or more open or closed-end investment companies or other managed accounts which are advised by directaddress for BGI Canada is Brookfield Place 161 Bay Street, Suite 2500, Toronto, Canada, Ontario M5J 2S1; the address for BGI Australia is Level 43, Grosvenor Place, 225 George Street, Sydney Australia NSW 1220; and indirect investment advisory subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc.the address for BGI Germany is Apianstrasse 6, D-85774 Unterfohring, Germany.

3


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     The Company’s          Our memorandum and articles of association provide for three classes of directors, with approximately one-third of the directors constituting our board of directors (“Board”)Board being elected each year to serve a three-year term. There are three directors comprising the class whose term expires at the 20052008 annual general meeting: Lawrence J. Chazen, Mary P. Ricciardello and William A. Sears.

          Mr. Sears will retire at the 2008 annual general meeting pursuant to the Company’s mandatory retirement age provision for directors. In accordance with the Company’s articles of association, our Board has determined to reduce the number of directors comprising our Board from nine to eight effective immediately after such retirement. The nominating and corporate governance committee of our Board has approved, and our Board has unanimously nominated, Mr. Chazen and Ms. Ricciardello and Mr. Sears for re-election as directors of the Company to serve three-year terms expiring in 2008, subject in the case of Mr. Sears to member adoption of the special resolution to amend the Company’s articles of association to increase the director retirement age to 72 from 70. For additional information regarding this proposal, see “Proposal to Amend Articles of Association to Increase Director Retirement Age” on page 21 of this proxy statement.2011.

          The directors nominated for election this year will be elected by a plurality of the Ordinary Shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual general meeting and entitled to vote. All duly submitted and unrevoked proxies will be voted for the nominees selected by our Board, except where authorization so to vote is withheld.Our Board unanimously recommends that members vote FOR the election of its nominees for director.

          Information with respect to the directors nominated for election this year, and the directors whose terms do not expire at the 20052008 annual general meeting, is presented below.

Nominees ForForDirectors

   
Lawrence J. Chazen,
  
age 64,67, director since 1994 Mr. Chazen has served since 1977 as Chief Executive Officer of Lawrence J. Chazen, Inc., a California registered investment adviser engaged in providing financial advisory services.
   
Mary P. Ricciardello,
  
age 49,52, director since 2003 Ms. Ricciardello served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Reliant Energy, Inc. from January 2001 to August 2002, and immediately prior to that served as its Senior Vice President and Comptroller from September 1999 to January 2001 and as its Vice President and Comptroller from 1996 to September 1999. Ms. Ricciardello also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Reliant Resources, Inc. from May 2001 to August 2002. Reliant principally provides electricity and energy services to retail and wholesale customers. Ms. Ricciardello’s current principal occupation is as a certified public accountant, and she has not held a principal employment since leaving her positions with Reliant Energy, Inc. and Reliant Resources, Inc. in August 2002. Ms. Ricciardello is also a director of U.S. Concrete, Inc. and Devon Energy Corporation.
Class Whose TermExpires In2009
   
William A. Sears,Julie H. Edwards,
  
age 70,49, director since 19982006 Mr. Sears retiredMs. Edwards served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development of Southern Union Company from his positionNovember 2006 to January 2007, and immediately prior to that served as Directorits Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from July 2005 to November 2006. Southern Union is primarily engaged in the transportation and distribution of Operationsnatural gas. Prior to joining Southern Union, Ms. Edwards served as Executive Vice President – Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer for British Petroleum ExplorationFrontier Oil Corporation in 1997,Houston since 2000. She joined Frontier Oil in 1991 as Vice President – Secretary and Treasurer after serving as Vice President of Corporate Finance for Smith Barney, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., New York and Houston, from 1988 to 1991, after joining the company as an associate in 1985. Ms. Edwards has not held a principal employment since leaving her position with them in various positions since 1983. British Petroleum ExplorationSouthern Union. Ms. Edwards is partalso a director of the BP group of companies, which is one of the world’s largest energy companies, with main activities comprising the explorationNATCO Group, Inc and production of crude oil and natural gas; refining, marketing, supply and transportation; and the manufacture and marketing of petrochemicals.ONEOK, Inc.

4


ClassWhoseTermExpiresIn 2006

James C. Day,
age 61, director since 1983Mr. Day has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company since October 1992 and as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 1984. He served as President of the Company from January 1984 to January 1999 before reassuming the office of President effective March 1, 2005. From January 1983 until his election as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Day served as Vice President of the Company. Mr. Day is also a director of two public companies, Global Industries, Ltd. and ONEOK, Inc., and a trustee of The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. , a not-for-profit corporation.
   
Marc E. Leland,
  
age 66,69, director since 1994 Mr. Leland has served since 1984 as President of Marc E. Leland & Associates, Inc., a company engaged in the business of providing financial advisory services.
David W. Williams,
age 50, director since January 2, 2008Mr. Williams has served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since January 2, 2008. Mr. Williams served as Senior Vice President – Business Development of Noble Drilling Services Inc., an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, from September 2006 to January 2007, as Senior Vice President – Operations of Noble Drilling Services Inc. from January to April 2007, and as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from April 2007 to January 2, 2008. Prior to September 2006, Mr. Williams served for more than five years as Executive Vice President of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., an offshore oil and gas drilling contractor.

ClassWhoseTermExpiresIn20072010

   
Michael A. Cawley,
  
age 57,60, director since 1985 Mr. Cawley has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation (the “Noble Foundation”), since February 1992, after serving as Executive Vice President of the Noble Foundation since January 1991. Mr. Cawley has served as a trustee of the Noble Foundation since 1988. The Noble Foundation is a not-for-profit corporation, and it is engaged in agricultural research, education, demonstration and consultation; plant biology and applied biotechnology; and assistance through granting to selected nonprofit organizations. For more than five years prior to 1991, Mr. Cawley was the President of Thompson & Cawley, a professional corporation, attorneys at law; and Mr. Cawley currently serves as of counsel to the law firm of Thompson, Cawley, Veazey & Burns, a professional corporation. Mr. Cawley is also a director of Noble Energy, Inc.
   
Luke R. Corbett,
  
age 58,61, director since 2001 Mr. Corbett has served as a director of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation since August 2006. Anadarko engages in the exploration, development, production, and marketing of natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids primarily in the United States. Mr. Corbett served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Kerr-McGee Corporation sincefrom May 1999 until his retirement in August 2006, and also from February 1997 to February 1999. Between February 1999 and May 1999, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Kerr-McGee, and from 1995 to 1997, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Kerr-McGee. Kerr-McGee, is an Oklahoma City-based energyoil and inorganic chemicalnatural gas exploration and production company, with worldwide operations.was acquired by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in August 2006. Mr. Corbett has served as a director of Kerr-McGee sincefrom 1995 to August 2006 and he is alsocurrently serves as a director of OGE Energy Corp. and BOK Financial Corporation.
   
Jack E. Little,
  
age 66,69, director since 2000 Mr. Little served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Shell Oil Company, and a member of the Board of Directors and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Shell Exploration & Production Company for more than five years until his retirement in June 1999. Shell Oil Company and its subsidiaries, with extensive operations in the United States, explore, develop, produce, purchase, transport and market crude oil and natural gas; they also purchase, manufacture, transport and market oil and chemical products and provide technical and business services. Mr. Little is also a director of TXU Corp.

5


None of the corporations or other organizations in which our non-management directors carried on their respective principal occupations and employments during the past five years is a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of the Company.

5


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board Independence

          Our Board has determined that each of the seven non-management directors of the CompanyMr. Chazen, Ms. Ricciardello, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Leland, Mr. Cawley, Mr. Corbett and Mr. Little qualifies as an “independent” director under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) corporate governance rules and that each member of the audit committee qualifies as “independent” under Rule 10A-3 underof the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These seven independent, non-management directors comprise in full the membership of each committee described below under “Board Committees and Meetings.”
          To be considered independent under the NYSE rules, our Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). The Company’s corporate governance guidelines provide that a director will not be independent if, within the preceding three years,
the director was employed by the Company;
an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of the Company;
the director or an immediate family member of the director received more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from the Company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such service is not contingent in any way on continued service);
the director was affiliated with or employed by, or an immediate family member of the director was affiliated with or employed in a professional capacity by, a present or former internal or external auditor of the Company;
the director or an immediate family member of the director was employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executives serve on that company’s compensation committee; or
the director is an executive officer or an employee, or an immediate family member of the director is an executive officer, of a company that made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1 million or two percent of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.
          The following will not be considered by our Board to be a material relationship that would impair a director’s independence. If a director is an executive officer of, or beneficially owns in excess of 10 percent equity interest in, another company
that does business with the Company, and the amount of the annual payments to the Company is less than five percent of the annual consolidated gross revenues of the Company;
that does business with the Company, and the amount of the annual payments by the Company to such other company is less than five percent of the annual consolidated gross revenues of the Company; or
to which the Company was indebted at the end of its last fiscal year in an aggregate amount that is less than five percent of the consolidated assets of the Company.
          For relationships not covered by the guidelines in the immediately preceding paragraph, the determination of whether the relationship is material or not, and therefore whether the director would be independent or not, is

6


made by our directors who satisfy the independence guidelines described above. These independence guidelines used by our Board are set forth in our corporate governance guidelines, which are published under the governance section of our website atwww.noblecorp.com.
          In accordance with the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, the non-management directors have chosen a lead director to preside at regularly scheduled executive sessions of our Board held without management present. Mr. Little currently serves as lead director.

     For additional information regarding the determination of independence of directors, see “Certain Transactions” below in this section.

Board Committees and Meetings

          The Company has standing audit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance, and finance committees of the board of directors.our Board. Each of these committees operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the respective committee and by our Board. The charters are published under the governance section of the Company’s website atwww.noblecorp.com.

and are available in print to any member who requests them.

          The current members of the committees, number of meetings held by each committee during 2004,2007, and a description of the functions performed by each committee are set forth below:

     Audit Committee (seven(20 meetings). The current members of the audit committee are Mary P. Ricciardello, Chair, Lawrence J. Chazen, Julie H. Edwards and Jack E. Little and William A. Sears.Little. Each member attended all meetings of the audit committee held in 2007, except that Mr. LittleMs. Edwards, who did not attend two meetingsone meeting, and Mr. Little, who did not attend one meeting conducted by means of telephonic communication. The primary responsibilities of the audit committee are to select and retain the Company’s auditors (including review and approval of the terms of engagement and fees), to review with the auditors the Company’s financial reports (and other financial information) provided to the SEC and the investing public, to prepare and publish an annual report for inclusion in this proxy statement, and to assist our Board with oversight of the following: integrity of the Company’s financial statements; compliance by the Company with standards of business ethics and legal and regulatory requirements; qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent auditors; and performance of the Company’s independent auditors and internal auditors. A copy of the charter of the audit committee is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. Our Board has determined that Ms. Ricciardello isand Ms. Edwards are each an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under the applicable SEC rules and regulations. The audit committee’s report relating to 20042007 begins on page 2946 of this proxy statement.

     Compensation Committee (five(eight meetings). The current members of the compensation committee are Michael A. Cawley, Chair, Luke R. Corbett Chair, Michael A. Cawley and Marc E. Leland. Each member attended all meetings of the compensation committee.committee held in 2007, except Mr. Corbett, who was appointed a member of the committee on September 20, 2007. Mr. Corbett attended all the compensation committee meetings that were held during the period in 2007 for which he has been a committee member. The primary responsibilities of the compensation committee are to discharge our Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of directors and executive officers, to assist our Board in reviewing and administering compensation, benefits, incentive and share-basedequity-based compensation plans, and to produceprepare an annual report on executive compensation.disclosure under the caption “Compensation Committee Report” for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement for its annual general meeting of members. The compensation committee’s report relating to 2004 begins2007 appears on page 1225 of this proxy statement.

     Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (four(six meetings). The current members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are Jack E. Little, Chair, Michael A. Cawley, Lawrence J. Chazen, Luke R. Corbett, Julie H. Edwards, Marc E. Leland and Mary P. Ricciardello and William A. Sears.Ricciardello. Each member attended all meetings of the nominating and corporate governance committee.committee held in 2007, except Ms. Edwards who did not attend one meeting. The primary responsibilities of the nominating and corporate governance committee are to assist our Board in reviewing, evaluating, selecting and recommending director nominees when one or more directors are to be appointed, elected or re-elected to our Board; to monitor, develop and recommend to our Board a set of principles, policies and

6


practices relating to corporate governance; and to oversee the process by which our Board, theour Chief Executive Officer and executive management are evaluated.

     Members entitled to vote for the election of directors may recommend candidates for nomination in accordance with the policy and procedures set forth in article 57 of the Company’s articles of association. Recommended nominees must satisfy the age qualifications set forth in article 54 of the Company’s articles of association. A copy of articlearticles 54 which is proposed for amendment (see “Proposal to Amend Articles of Association to Increase Director Retirement Age”), and of article 57 is included in Annex BA attached to this proxy statement. The

7


nominating and corporate governance committee believes that directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, character, integrity and values; an inquisitive and objective perspective; practical wisdom; and mature judgment. Directors must be willing to devote sufficient time to discharging their duties and responsibilities effectively, and they should be committed to serving on our Board for an extended period of time. The nominating and corporate governance committee endeavors to have a Board representing diverse experience in policy-making positions in areas that are relevant to the Company’s lines of business and areas of operations worldwide.

     The nominating and corporate governance committee’s process for identifying candidates includes seeking recommendations from one or more of the following: current and retired directors and executive officers of the Company; a firm or firms(or firms) that specializespecializes in identifying director candidates (which firm may earn a fee for its services paid by the Company); persons known to directors of the Company in accounting, legal and other professional service organizations or educational institutions; and, subject to compliance with applicable procedures, members of the Company. The nominating and corporate governance committee’s process for evaluating candidates includes investigation of the person’s specific experiences and skills, time availability in light of commitments, potential conflicts of interest, and independence from management and the Company. Candidates recommended by a member are evaluated in the same manner as are other candidates. We did not receive any recommendations from members of the Company for director nominees for the 20052008 annual general meeting.

     Finance Committee (four meetings). The current members of the finance committee are WilliamLuke R. Corbett, Chair, Michael A. Sears, Chair,Cawley, Lawrence J. Chazen, Luke R. Corbett andJulie H. Edwards, Marc E. Leland.Leland, Jack E. Little, Mary P. Ricciardello and William A. Sears. Each of the members attended all meetings of the finance committee.committee held in 2007, except Ms. Edwards who did not attend one meeting. The primary responsibility of the finance committee is to assist our Board in fulfilling its oversight function with respect to our financial affairs and policies, including capital requirements and structure, share repurchase programs, dividend policy, and long-range financial strategic planning.

          Under the Company’s policy on director attendance at annual general meetings of members, all directors are expected to attend each annual general meeting, and any director who should become unable to attend the 20052008 annual general meeting is responsible for notifying the Chairman of the Board in advance of the meeting. At the date of this proxy statement, we know of no director who will not attend the 20052008 annual general meeting. In 2004,2007, all directors attended the annual general meeting of members.

          In 2004,2007, our Board held six meetings. All directors attended all of the 20042007 Board meetings.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. Messrs. Cawley,meetings, except Mr. Corbett and Leland, the current members of the compensation committee, were the only personsMs. Edwards who served on the committee during 2004. For additional information regarding Mr. Corbett, see “Certain Transactions” below in this section.

7

each did not attend one meeting.


Member Communications with Directors

          Our Board has approved the following process for members and other security holders of the Company and interested parties to send communications to our Board. To contact all directors on our Board, all directors on a Board committee, an individual director, or the non-management directors of our Board as a group, the member, or other security holder or interested party can:

  mail Noble Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 13135 South Dairy Ashford, Suite 800, Sugar Land, Texas 77478;
 
  e-mailnobleboard@noblecorp.comnobleboard@noblecorp.com;; or
 
  telephone the NobleLine (toll-free and anonymous, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week) at 877-285-4162.

          All communications received in the mail are opened by the office of the Company’s Secretary for the purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to our Board. All communications received electronically are processed under the oversight of our Board by the Company’s director of internal audit and/or general counsel. Complaints or concerns relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters are referred to the audit committee of theour Board. Complaints or concerns relating to other corporate matters, which are not addressed to a specific director, are referred to the appropriate functional manager within the Company for review and response. A summary of the incoming contact and the manager’s response is reported to our Board. Complaints or concerns relating to corporate matters other than the specific items referred to

8


the audit committee as described above, which are addressed to a specific director, committee of our Board, or group of directors, are promptly relayed to such persons.

Director Education

          We provide our directors with information and materials that are designed to assist them in performing their duties as directors. We provide director manuals, periodic presentations on new developments in relevant areas, such as legal and accounting matters, as well as opportunities to attend director education programs at the Company’s expense. Our director manual contains important information about the Company and the responsibilities of our directors, including: our memorandum and articles of association; guidelines for assignments regarding standing committees of our Board; the charter for each of our Board committees; a summary of laws and regulations regarding compliance with insider reporting and trading; our Codecode of Business Conductbusiness conduct and Ethics;ethics; corporate directors’ guidebooks published by such organizations as the American Bar Association Section of Business Law, National Association of Corporate Directors, and American Society of Corporate Secretaries; a statement of the NobleCompany paradigms that govern how we conduct our business; and our safety policy and quality policy and objectives.

Compensation of DirectorsPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

     The compensation committee of our Board sets          Transactions with related persons are reviewed, approved or ratified in accordance with the compensation of our directors. In determining the appropriate level of compensation for our directors, the compensation committee considers the commitment required from our directors in performing their duties on behalf of the Company, as well as comparative information the committee obtains from an independent compensation consulting firmpolicies and from other sources. Set forth below is a description of the compensation of our directors.

Annual Retainers and Other Fees and Expenses.We pay our non-employee directors an annual retainer of $35,000 ($50,000, subject to member approval for the period effective after August 1, 2004), of which 20 percent is paid in Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Under this plan, non-employee directors may elect to receive up to all of the balance in Ordinary Shares or cash. Non-employee directors make elections on a quarterly basis. The number of Ordinary Shares to be issued under the plan in any particular quarter is generally determined using the average of the daily closing prices of the Ordinary Shares for the last 15 consecutive trading days of the previous quarter. For more information regarding the plan and the proposal being submitted for member approval at the annual general meeting, see “Proposal to Amend the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors” beginning on page 26 of this proxy statement.

8


     In addition, we pay our non-employee directors a Board meeting fee of $2,000 and a committee meeting fee of $2,000 per meeting. Prior to August 1, 2004, the committee meeting fee was $1,500 per meeting and the chair of a standing Board committee received an additional $1,000 per committee meeting. Since August 1, 2004, the chair of the audit committee receives an annual retainer of $12,000 and the chair of each other standing Board committee receives an annual retainer of $10,000. We pay a director who is also one of our officers a fee of $100 for each Board meeting attended. We also reimburse directors for travel, lodging and related expenses they may incur in attending Board and committee meetings.

Non-Employee Director Stock Options.Under the Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “1992 Plan”), non-employee directors receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 10,000 Ordinary Shares. Thereafter, on the next business day after each annual general meeting of members of the Company, such directors receive an annual grant of an option to purchase 7,500 Ordinary Shares. The options are granted at fair market value on the grant date, which is generally determined using the average of the daily closing prices of the Ordinary Shares for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date of grant, and are exercisable from time to time over a period commencing one year from the grant date and ending on the expiration of 10 years from the grant date, unless terminated sooner as described in the plan. For additional information regarding the plan and the proposal being submitted for member approval at the annual general meeting, see “Proposal Regarding the Noble Corporation 1992 Nonquailifed Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors” beginning on page 22 of this proxy statement.

Employment Agreements

     The Company has entered into employment agreements with each named executive officer listed in the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 15 of this proxy statement. These employment agreements become effective upon a change of control of the Company (within the meaningprocedures set forth in our code of business conduct and ethics and our administrative policy manual, the agreements)procedures described below with respect to director and officer questionnaires, and the other procedures described below.

          Our code of business conduct and ethics provides that conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of Company policy. Under such code of business conduct and ethics, any employee, officer or a termination of employment in connection with or in anticipationdirector who becomes aware of a change of control, and remain effective for three years thereafter.

     The agreements provide that ifconflict, potential conflict or an uncertainty as to whether a conflict exists should bring the officer’s employment is terminated within three years after a change of control or priormatter to but in anticipationthe attention of a changesupervisor, manager or other appropriate personnel. The Company’s Board and its senior management review all reported relationships and transactions in which the Company and any director, officer or family member of control, either (1) by us for reasons other than death, disabilitya director or “cause” (as definedofficer are participants to determine whether an actual or potential conflict of interest exists. Our Board may approve or ratify any such relationship or transaction if our Board determines that such relationship or transaction is in the agreement) or (2) bybest interests (or not inconsistent with the officer for “good reason” (which term includes a diminution of responsibilities or compensation, or a determination by the officer to leave during the 30-day period immediately following the first anniversary of the change of control), the officer will receive: (a) any unpaid portion of his current salary and prorated portion of his highest bonus paid either in the last three years before the change of control or for the last completed fiscal year after the change of control (the “Highest Bonus”); (b) a lump sum payment equal to three times the sum of his annual base salary (based on the highest monthly salary paid in the 12 months prior to the change of control) and his Highest Bonus; (c) benefits to him and his family at least equal to those which would have been provided had the employment not been terminated for a three-year period; (d) any compensation previously deferred by the officer (together with any accrued interest or earnings thereon) and any accrued vacation pay; and (e) a lump sum amount equal to the excess of (i) the actuarial equivalent of the benefit under the qualified defined benefit retirement planbest interests) of the Company and its affiliated companiesmembers. A conflict of interest exists when an individual’s personal interest is adverse to or otherwise in whichconflict with the officer is eligible to participate had the officer’s employment continued for three years after termination over (ii) the actuarial equivalent of the officer’s actual benefit under such plans. The agreements also require the Company to make an additional payment in an amount such that after the payment of all income and excise taxes, the officer will be in the same after-tax position as if no excise tax under Section 4999 (the so-called Parachute Payment excise tax) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, if any, had been imposed.

Certain Transactions

     Subsidiaries of the Company received an aggregate of approximately $44.3 million in 2004 from Kerr-McGee Corporation (or its subsidiaries) for contract drilling services performed by the Company’s subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business. The drilling contracts for such services were negotiated and entered into under competitive marketplace conditions. The Company believes that these transactions during 2004 were on terms that were reasonable and in the best interests of the Company.

Our code of business conduct and ethics sets forth several examples of how conflicts of interest may arise, including when
an employee, officer or director or a member of his or her family receives improper personal benefits because of such employee’s, officer’s or director’s position in the Company;
a loan by the Company to, or a guarantee by the Company of an obligation of, an employee or his or her family member is made;
an employee works for or has any direct or indirect business connection with any of our competitors, customers or suppliers; or
Company assets and properties are used for personal gain or Company business opportunities are usurped for personal gain.
In addition, our administrative policy manual, which applies to all our employees, defines some additional examples of what the Company considers to be a conflict of interest, including when
subject to certain limited exceptions, an employee or consultant or any member of his or her immediate family has an interest in any business entity that deals with the Company where there is an opportunity for preferential treatment to be given or received;
an employee or consultant serves as an officer, a director, or in any management capacity of another business entity directly or indirectly related to the contract drilling or energy services industries without specific authority from our Board;

9


an employee or consultant or any member of his or her immediate family buys, sells or leases any kind of property, facilities or equipment from or to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or to any business entity or individual who is or is seeking to become a contractor, supplier or customer, without specific authority from our Board; or
subject to certain limited exceptions, an employee or consultant or any member of his or her immediate family accepts gifts, payments, extravagant entertainment, services or loans in any form from anyone soliciting business, or who may already have established business relations, with the Company.
          Each year we require all our directors, nominees for director and Company officers to complete and sign a questionnaire in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at our annual general meeting of members. The purpose of the questionnaire is to obtain information, including information regarding transactions with related persons, for inclusion in our proxy statement or annual report.
          In making its determination that Mr. Corbett qualifies as an “independent” director, the Board considered theseaddition, we review SEC filings made by beneficial owners of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities to determine whether information relating to transactions and determined that they did not disqualify Mr. Corbett for reasons including the competitive marketplace conditions and the arm’s-length nature under which the drilling contracts were entered.with such persons needs to be included in our proxy statement or annual report.

10


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

          The following table sets forth as of March 3, 2005December 31, 2007 the beneficial ownership of Ordinary Shares by each of our directors, each “named executive officer” of the Company listed in the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 1526 of this proxy statement, and all of our directors and named executive officers as a group.
                  
 Ordinary Shares  Ordinary Shares
 Beneficially Owned (1)  Beneficially Owned (1)
 Number of Percent of  Number of Percent of
Name Shares Class (2)  Shares Class (2)
Directors  
Michael A. Cawley  924,591(3)(4)  0.7% 1,862,773  (3)(4)  0.7%
Lawrence J. Chazen  37,733(3)   77,994  (3)  
Luke R. Corbett  25,732(3)   82,478  (3)  
James C. Day  1,820,237(3)(4)  1.3%
Julie H. Edwards 34,790  (3)  
Marc E. Leland  55,592(3)   141,772  (3)  0.1%
Jack E. Little  42,032(3)   117,675  (3)  
Mary P. Ricciardello  11,189(3)   53,718  (3)  
William A. Sears  59,505(3)   166,619  (3)  0.1%
David W. Williams 229,736  (3)  0.1%
Named Executive Officers (excluding any Director above) and Group
  
Julie J. Robertson 1,019,326  (3)  0.4%
Thomas L. Mitchell 169,339  (3)  0.1%
Robert D. Campbell 100,457  (3)  
James C. Day 2,579,376  (3)(4)(5)  1.0%
Mark A. Jackson  186,635(3)  0.1% 227,452  (3)(6)  0.1%
Danny W. Adkins  31,670(3)  
Julie J. Robertson  438,057(3)  0.3%
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)
  2,758,334(5)  2.0%
All directors and named executive officers as a group (14 persons)
 5,114,227  (7)  1.9%


(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares listed.
 
(2) The percent of class shown is less than one-tenth of one percent unless otherwise indicated.
 
(3) Includes shares attributable to Ordinary Shares not outstanding but subject to currentlyoptions exercisable options,at December 31, 2007 or within 60 days thereafter, as follows: Mr. Cawley – 45,00084,000 shares; Mr. Chazen – 31,00048,000 shares; Mr. Corbett – 25,00058,000 shares; Ms. Edwards – 20,000 shares; Mr. Leland – 77,000 shares; Mr. Little – 83,000 shares; Ms. Ricciardello – 28,000 shares; Mr. Sears – 97,000 shares; Mr. Williams – 42,486 shares; Ms. Robertson – 634,124 shares; Mr. Mitchell – 32,768 shares; Mr. Campbell – 5,398 shares; Mr. Day – 627,500390,352 shares; Mr. Leland – 55,000 shares; Mr. Little – 37,500 shares; Ms. Ricciardello – 10,000 shares; Mr. Sears – 44,500 shares;and Mr. Jackson – 106,135 shares; Mr. Adkins – 2,999 shares; and Ms. Robertson – 344,999161,222 shares.
 
(4) Includes 874,6391,749,278 Ordinary Shares beneficially owned by the Noble Foundation. Mr. Cawley, as President and Chief Executive Officer and a trustee, and Mr. Day, as a trustee, of the Noble Foundation may be deemed to beneficially own, and have voting and investment power with respect to, the 874,6391,749,278 Ordinary Shares held by the Noble Foundation. As one of the 12 members of the board of trustees of the Noble Foundation, neither Mr. Cawley nor Mr. Day represents sufficient voting power on the Noble Foundation’s board of trustees to determine voting or investment decisions with respect to the 874,6391,749,278 Ordinary Shares. Mr. Cawley and Mr. Day each disclaim any pecuniary interest in the 874,6391,749,278 Ordinary Shares.
 
(5) Includes 1,329,633246,479 Ordinary Shares held in a trust, as to which Mr. Day exercises shared voting and investment power.
(6)Based on information provided to the Company on behalf of Mr. Jackson.
(7)Includes 1,761,350 Ordinary Shares not outstanding but subject to currentlyoptions exercisable optionsat December 31, 2007 or within 60 days thereafter and 874,6391,749,278 Ordinary Shares beneficially owned by the Noble Foundation. See footnotes (3) and (4) above.

10


Share Ownership by Executives

     We encourage all of our executives to align their interests with our members by making a personal investment in our Ordinary Shares. In 2000, we adopted the minimum ownership guidelines set forth below for our executives. We expect that each of our executives will meet these minimum guidelines within five years of when the guidelines first apply to him or her. To facilitate implementation of these guidelines, executives in the indicated pay grade levels will receive one-half of any bonus amounts under the Company’s Short Term Incentive Plan in Ordinary Shares until the applicable ownership target is satisfied. For additional information regarding the Short Term Incentive Plan, see “Compensation Philosophy and Objectives – Annual Incentives” in the compensation committee’s report beginning on page 12 of this proxy statement.

Ownership Guidelines
Pay Grade Level(Multiple of Base Salary)
Pay Grade 375.0 times
Pay Grades 34 through 364.0 times
Pay Grades 31 through 333.5 times
Pay Grades 28 through 302.5 times
Pay Grades 27 through 282.0 times

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The following report of the compensation committee on executive compensation and the information herein under “Executive Compensation – Performance Graph” shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s proxy rules, except for the required disclosure herein, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and such information shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

11


REXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONeport of the
CompensationCommitteeOn Executive Compensation

To the Members of
Noble Corporation:

     The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of executive officers, including the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer,Discussion and for assisting the board of directors (the “Board”) in reviewing and administering the compensation programs, benefits, incentive and equity-based compensation plans that make it possible for Noble Corporation (the “Company”) to remain a leader in the drilling industry.

     Comprised entirely of independent, non-management directors of the Company, the Committee met five times in 2004. Additionally, the Chairman of the Committee met on several occasions with members of senior management and independent compensation consultants.

     The Committee has retained the services of an independent management and compensation consulting firm in making its determinations and recommendations in regard to executive compensation. In 2004, this consultant reviewed the Company’s compensation program and policies, presented reports thereon to the Committee, and held two meetings with the Committee.

Analysis

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

          The Company’s executive compensation program reflects the Company’s philosophy that executives’ compensation should be structured so as to closely align theirexecutives’ interests with the interests of our members (shareholders).members. The program is designed around stock-basedto emphasize equity-based incentive and performance-based pay and, in order to promote an atmosphere of teamwork, fairness and motivation, these concepts extend beyond the named executive officers to other key employees throughout the Company. The primary objectives of the Company’s total compensation package are to emphasize operating performance criteria that enhance member (shareholder) value and to establish and maintain a competitive executive compensation program that enables the Company to attract, retain and motivate high caliber executives who will assurecontribute to the long-term success of the Company.

     Compensation surveys of external competitiveness are When used in assessing reasonablenessthis Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the term “named executive officers” means those persons listed in the Summary Compensation Table.

          Consistent with this philosophy, we seek to provide a total compensation package for the named executive officers that is similar to those of compensation.the companies in the direct peer and broad energy peer benchmarking groups described below and yet is structured so that it results in having a substantial portion of total compensation subject to company, individual and share price performance. In making these determinations, we annually review each compensation component and compare it to various internal and external performance standards and market reference points. The application of our compensation philosophy to our named executive officers is described below in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.
Executive Compensation Program Design
          The objective of the Company and individualthe compensation committee is to attract, retain and motivate the most highly qualified executive officers who will contribute to the Company’s goals by consistently delivering exceptional performance. In order to accomplish the Company’s goals, we believe compensation paid to executive officers should be designed around equity-based incentive and performance-based pay, thereby aligning the interest of our executive officers with those of the Company’s members.
          Equity-based incentive and performance-based pay constituted a substantial portion of the compensation package of the indicated named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2007, as shown by the percentages in the following table, which are calculated based on the information set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
Percentage of Total Compensation in 2007
                 
  David W. Julie J. Thomas L. Robert D.
Compensation Component Williams Robertson Mitchell Campbell
Equity-based incentives or performance-based pay (1)  72% (3)  58%  73% (3)  56%
                 
Not equity-based incentives or performance-based pay (2)  28%  42%  27%  44%
                 
                 
Total Compensation  100%  100%  100%  100%
(1)Percentage represents the sum of the dollar amounts in the Stock Awards, Option Awards, and Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation columns of the Summary Compensation Table divided by the amount set forth in the Total column.

12


(2)Percentage represents the sum of the dollar amounts in the Salary, Bonus, Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings, and All Other Compensation columns of the Summary Compensation Table divided by the amount set forth in the Total column.
(3)Percentages reflect grants of nonqualified stock options and awards of restricted Ordinary Shares (“Restricted Shares”) made in 2006 at the time the named executive officer joined the Company. Effective September 20, 2006, Mr. Williams received an award of 100,000 time-vested Restricted Shares and a grant of 100,000 nonqualified stock options. Effective November 6, 2006, Mr. Mitchell received an award of 80,000 time-vested Restricted Shares and a grant of 80,000 nonqualified stock options. Each of these awards and grants has a three-year vesting period and, pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”), the grant date fair value of each such award and grant is recognized on a straight line basis as an expense to the Company over the service period (which generally represents the vesting period). The dollar amounts in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns of the Summary Compensation Table include the amounts recognized in 2007 by the Company pursuant to SFAS No. 123R for these awards and grants. These equity-based awards and grants reflect the results of direct negotiations with each of Mr. Williams and Mr. Mitchell, and their respective backgrounds and experience.
          At the request of the compensation committee, our compensation program is reviewed on an annual basis to ensure it meets the objectives of our compensation program and is benchmarked with the market.
          Prior compensation from the Company, such as gains from previously awarded stock options, is not generally taken into account in setting other elements of compensation, such as base pay, short-term incentive award payments, long-term incentive awards or retirement and other benefits. With respect to newly-hired executive officers, we take into account their prior base salary and performance and incentive based pay, as well as the contribution expected to be made by the new executive officer and the responsibilities and duties of the executive officer with us. We believe that our executive officers should be fairly compensated each year relative to market pay levels of our peer groups and internal equity within the Company.

13


Compensation Program Comparator Groups
          Based on its work with Hewitt Associates LLC, an independent management and compensation consulting firm retained by the compensation committee (“Hewitt”), the compensation committee approved three comparator groups to be used in 2007 for our compensation program. The compensation information for these groups comes from surveys and publicly available data. Details on the three groups are also consideredas follows:
Direct Peer GroupBroad Energy Peer GroupGeneral Industry Peer Group
Rationale: Provides market data on companies that are very similar to us in terms of business activities, operations, revenue size and scopeRationale: Provides market data on companies that are similar to us in terms of competition for executive talent, energy industry knowledge, operations, revenue size and scopeRationale: Provides market data on companies that are similar to us in terms of revenue size and that represent employment alternatives for some executives outside of the industry
Companies included are:Companies included are:Companies included are:
¾ Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.¾ Baker Hughes Inc.¾ ACCO Brands Corporation
¾ ENSCO International, Inc.¾ BJ Services Company¾ Albemarle Corporation
¾ GlobalSantaFe Corp.¾ Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation¾ Allergan, Inc.
¾ Helmerich & Payne, Inc.¾ Cameron International¾ Ametek, Inc.
¾ Nabors Industries Ltd.Corporation¾ Arch Chemicals, Inc.
¾ Pride International, Inc.¾ Chicago Bridge & Iron Company¾ Brady Corporation
¾ Rowan Companies, Inc.¾ Cimarex Energy Company¾ Chaparral Steel Company
¾ Transocean, Inc.¾ El Paso Corporation¾ Church & Dwight Company, Inc.
¾ Equitable Resources, Inc.¾ Cleco Corporation
¾ FMC Technologies Inc.¾ Curtiss-Wright Corporation
¾ Forest Oil Corporation¾ Donaldson Company, Inc.
¾ Noble Energy, Inc.¾ Equifax Inc.
¾ Pioneer Natural Resources¾ Herman Miller, Inc.
Company¾ Joy Global Inc.
¾ Plains Exploration &¾ Kaman Corporation
Production Company¾ Kennametal Inc.
¾ Schlumberger Ltd.¾ Kinetic Concepts Inc.
¾ Southwestern Energy Company¾ Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
¾ St. Mary Land & Exploration¾ PolyOne Corporation
Company¾ The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
¾ Steelcase Inc.
¾ Thomas & Betts Corporation
¾ Vulcan Materials Company
¾ W. R. Grace & Company
¾ Walter Industries, Inc.
¾ Woodward Governor Company
          Data from these peer groups are an important part of the decision process used by the compensation committee in determining individual pay levels. The primary comparative data utilized reflect the markets in which the Company competes for businessdesign, components and talent, including companies within the drilling and energy services industries and selected companies from general industry having similar revenue size, number of employees and market capitalization and which,award levels in our opinion, provide comparable references.executive pay programs. The compensation committee endeavors to conduct its review on an annual basis for each named executive officer to ensure that our compensation program works as designed and intended. This review by the compensation committee also facilitates discussion among the members of the compensation committee regarding all our compensation and benefit programs.

14


Compensation Program Overview

     The elements

          Following is an overview of the Company’s executiveprincipal components of our compensation program:
Compensation Program
ComponentStructure/RationaleObjectives
SalarySalary for the named executive officers is reviewed and set annually based on market practices observed within the Direct Peer and Broad Energy Peer Groups in particular.
We generally target salary levels between the 50th and 75th percentile of the Direct and Broad Energy Peer Groups with high performing named executive officers approximating the 75th percentile.
Salary levels and adjustments to salary take into account our executives’ responsibilities,
individual performance and internal equity within the Company.
Based on our review of market data provided by Hewitt, the named
This component of pay is generally used to attract, retain and motivate executives.
executive officers’ pay levels for 2007 are consistent with our philosophy.
Short-term incentives awarded under the Noble Corporation Short Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”)Given the emphasis we and the compensation committee place on performance-based compensation, annual incentive targets are set above the energy market 50th percentile.Bonus targets are set annually to correspond generally with the market 75th percentile of the Direct and Broad Energy Peer Groups.
This structure allows for a total cash compensation opportunity (base salary, plus short-term incentive awards) at or above the energy market 50th percentile commensurate with performance.The Company’s goal is for the total cash compensation opportunity for each named executive officer to be between the 50th and 75th percentile of the Direct and Broad Energy Peer Groups, if the performance of the named executive officer warrants.
This program encourages and rewards achievement of annual financial and operational
performance and individual goals and objectives.The named executive officers’ pay levels for 2007 are consistent with our philosophy.
Long-term incentives awarded pursuant to the Noble Corporation 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, as amended (the “1991 Plan”)Awards are provided to executive officers on the basis of market compensation data as well as the executive officers’ responsibility and ability to influence the management and growth of the Company.Given the design as described further below, award levels are set to correspond generally with the Direct and Broad Energy Peer Groups’ 75th percentile level.
Grants and awards of long-term incentives ensure a longer term focus and facilitate share ownership for named executive officers.The named executive officers’ pay levels for 2007 are consistent with our philosophy.
Our long-term incentives consist of:
Performance-vested restricted share awards designed to reward relative total member (shareholder) return versus industry comparators,
Time-vested restricted share awards which facilitate retention of the named executive officer and a focus on longer term share price appreciation, and
Stock option grants that are designed to reward absolute share price appreciation.
Although infrequently used for named executive officers, we and the compensation committee have the ability to grant additional stock options and time-vested Restricted Shares based on specific situations including new hire awards, retention and motivation needs.

15


Compensation Program
ComponentStructure/RationaleObjectives
Retirement and Other BenefitsOur retirement programs provide retirement income benefits to their participants. These retirement programs and certain other benefits are discussed in further detail under the caption “Retirement and Other Benefits.”

The Company believes that these programs and benefits assist in maintaining a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining officers and other employees.

Change of ControlWe enter into these agreements with our namedThe Company believes that these
Employment Agreementsexecutive officers and certain other key employees in an effort to attract and retain executive talent and to ensure their actions align with the interests of the Company and its members in the event of a change of control. These agreements are discussed in further detail under the caption “Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control — Change of Control Employment Agreements.”agreements assist in maintaining a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining officers and other key employees.
          When targeting a percentile of (a) base salaries, (b) cash incentive payments under the Short Term Incentive Plan, (c) nonqualified stock options, (d) performance-vested restricted stock and time-vested restricted stock awards and (e) employee benefits.

Base Salaries

     The base salaries forDirect Peer Group, the compensation committee benchmarked compensation by (i) ranking our named executive officers in relation to total compensation paid and comparing the named executive officers to individuals comparably ranked in companies included in the Direct Peer Group and (ii) comparing compensation of the named executive officers to the compensation of individuals in like positions in the companies included in the Direct Peer Group, where sufficient data for such a comparison were available. When targeting a percentile of the Broad Energy Peer Group, the compensation committee benchmarked compensation of the named executive officers to like positions in the companies included in the Broad Energy Peer Group. Although the compensation committee generally does not target compensation for the named executive officers to correspond with a percentile level of the General Industry Peer Group, data from this peer group are reviewed annuallyused by our compensation committee to monitor general market trends in compensation.

How Amounts for Compensation Components are Determined
          In addition to the Committee against competitive company information provided by outsideabove, following are other details on specific compensation consultants and,components for 2007:
2007 Base Salary.Base salary levels of the named executive officers were determined based on a combination of factors, including our compensation philosophy, market compensation data, competition for key executive talent, the competitive market and the executive’snamed executive officer’s experience, leadership, achievement of specified business objectives and contribution to the Company’s success, may be periodically adjusted.the Company’s overall annual budget for merit increases and the named executive officer’s individual performance. In the Committee’scompensation committee’s first meeting of each year (late January or early February), the Committeecompensation committee conducts aan annual review of the base salaries of named executive officers by taking into account these factors.
          Base salary was increased for Mr. Williams, Ms. Robertson and Mr. Campbell in February 2007 in connection with the compensation committee’s annual review of base salaries. Base salary was further increased for Mr. Williams in April 2007 to compensate him for an increase in responsibilities and duties. As in 2006, the compensation committee continued to focus on the heightened competition for executives in the energy market in 2007.
          For the named executive officers serving the Company at December 31, 2007, base salary at that date ranged (i) from 71 percent to 94 percent of the 75th percentile of the like positions in the Broad Energy Peer Group and (ii) from 78 percent to 105 percent of the 75th percentile of the applicable ranks in the Direct Peer Group.
          The compensation committee does not necessarily target base salary at any particular percentage of total compensation. Instead, base salary increases for each individual are generally determined by considering the factors set forth above. Base salary levels of named executive officers vary from one another primarily due to the benchmarking of compensation for each named executive officer based on various factors including scope of responsibility, overall performancea comparison to individuals holding like positions in the Broad Energy Peer Group and competitive market data.Direct Peer Group and individuals in comparably-ranked positions in the Direct Peer Group.

16

Annual Incentives


     Noble’s Short Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”) is a goal-driven plan that

2007 Short-Term Incentives and Other Bonus Awards.The STIP gives participants, including the named executive officers, the opportunity to earn annual cash bonuses in relation to specified target award levels defined as a percentage of the participants’their base salaries. To be eligible to receive a STIP award for the 2007 plan year, the participant must have been actively employed on December 31, 2007 and must have continued to be employed through the date on which the STIP award payments were made. The 2007 STIP does not require a minimum period of service to be eligible for consideration of an award.
          Plan award sizes were developed considering market data and internal equity. For each of the named executive officers serving the Company at December 31, 2007, the combination of base salary plus target award exceeded the market 50th percentile of the Direct and Broad Energy Peer Groups.
          The purpose of our short-term incentive plan is to tie compensation directly to specific business goals and management objectives and individual performance. The Company believes that the performance goals for the 2007 plan year, which were based on safety results, earnings per share, and cash operating margin, were appropriately chosen to focus our named executive officers on performance designed to lead to increased member value.
The target award levelsawards set forth in the STIPplan range from 10 percent of

12


base salary for the lowest eligible participant to 75 percent for the Chief Executive Officer. Depending on actual performance measured against the performance goals set by the Committee, STIP awards can range from zero to 150100 percent of base salary, with the latter target award generally set for our Chief Executive Officer. Since neither Mr. Jackson, our former Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, nor Mr. Sears, our interim Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, was employed through the date on which the 2007 STIP award payments were made, the target awards for the CEOnamed executive officers who were eligible to participate in the STIP for the 2007 plan year were 55 percent or up to 11075 percent of base salary for other executive officers.

salary. For each participant, a portion of the total STIP award is based on the achievement of performance goals (“Performance Bonus”) and the remaining portion of the STIP award is available at the discretion of the compensation committee based on merit, individual and team performance and additional selected criteria (“Discretionary Bonus”). The Committeecompensation committee sets performance goals annually for the STIP.plan.

          The Performance Bonus awards areportion of the STIP award is calculated by multiplying one-half of the target bonusaward by a multiplier, which is calculated by measuring actual performance against the performance goals. Corporate and division personnel, including the named executive officers, have different performance goals.goals from division personnel. The performance goals for 2004 of both the Noble2007 for corporate employees (including the CEO) and the division employeespersonnel were weighted with respect to three criteria: safety results (40 percent), earnings per share (30 percent) and cash operating margin (30 percent), defined as contract drilling revenues less contract drilling cost.
          As a result of modifications to the STIP plan made in April 2007, return on capital employed (30 percent). The 2004 performance goals of the Noble Technology Services Division (Noble Downhole Technology, Maurer Technology and Noble Engineering & Development) were weightedwas replaced with respect to three criteria: capital budget (40 percent), commercialization of products and services (30 percent), and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) (30 percent). The 2004cash operating margin as a performance goal component to the STIP. The Company believes that cash operating margin is a better measure of Triton Engineering Servicescurrent operating performance for a short-term incentive plan than return on capital employed, which may be substantially driven by investment decisions made in prior years rather than operating performance achieved in the current plan year. The Company was based on net income.

     Fifty percentalso believes that its goal of the bonus calculation for allachieving cooperation between corporate employees and division employees is based onachieved by including cash operating margin as a performance goal component.

          For the 2007 plan year, a combined weighted percentage of goal achievement for corporate employees is calculated by weighting the achievement of the corporate goals described above. The applicable performance goals undermultiplier used to calculate the Performance Bonus is then determined within a range of zero for an achievement of a combined weighted percentage of goal achievement of less than 65 percent and 2.0 for an achievement of a combined weighted percentage of goal achievement of more than 160 percent. The Performance Bonus portion of the STIP award is then determined by taking the applicable multiplier, ranging from zero to 2.0, and 50 percentmultiplying it by one-half of the individual’s target award.
          The Discretionary Bonus portion of the STIP is available at the discretion of the Committee based on merit, individualcompensation committee and teamcan range from zero to 2.0 times one-half of the individual’s target award. The resulting total STIP awards for the 2007 plan year, which include the Performance Bonus and Discretionary Bonus, could have ranged from zero to 150 percent of base salary for the named executive officer with the highest target award and from zero to 110 percent of base salary for the named executive officer with the lowest target award.

17


          For the 2007 plan year, the combined weighted percentage of goal achievement for corporate personnel resulted in an applicable multiplier of 1.40, which was calculated by first determining a combined weighted percentage of goal achievement as follows:
((0.4 [safety results] x 1.25 [adjustment factor for performance relative to industry average]) +
(0.3 [earnings per share] x 1.25 [adjustment factor for performance relative to budget]) +
(0.3 [cash operating margin] x 1.25 [adjustment factor for performance relative to budget]))
equals
a combined weighted adjustment factor of 1.25 or a combined weighted percentage of goal achievement of 125 percent.
For the 2007 plan year, a combined weighted percentage of goal achievement of 125 percent corresponds to an applicable multiplier of 1.40. The Performance Bonuses for the 2007 plan year paid to the named executive officers who were eligible to receive a STIP award for the 2007 plan year are included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
          Our current Chief Executive Officer recommended, and additional criteria selectedthe compensation committee approved, Discretionary Bonuses for the 2007 plan year for the named executive officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer) who were eligible to participate in the STIP for the 2007 plan year. The Discretionary Bonus for our current Chief Executive Officer was determined by the Committee.

compensation committee. The Company hasDiscretionary Bonuses for the 2007 plan year paid a bonus underto the termsnamed executive officers are included in the Bonus column of the STIPSummary Compensation Table.

          On October 25, 2007, the compensation committee awarded a one-time discretionary bonus to Julie J. Robertson in ninethe amount of $150,000 in recognition of her outstanding efforts during executive management transition periods in 2007. This bonus was not awarded pursuant to the 28 years that the STIP has been in effect.

STIP.

2007 Long-Term Incentive CompensationIncentives.

It has been a longstanding objective of the Company to reward executive officers and key employees with equity compensation, in keeping with the overall compensation philosophy to further instillalign executives’ and employees’ interests with the interests of our members. We believe long-term incentives promote sustained member (shareholder) perspective and valuesvalue by encouraging named executive officers to accomplish goals that benefit the Company both in the actions of employeespresent and executive officers.over a longer time period.

          The Company awarded nocompensation committee established in 2004 an equity-based compensation to executive officers or employees during 2003 while the Committee was studying the Company’s overall program. In April 2004, the Committee implemented a revised equity based long-term incentive compensation program for executive officers and key employees consisting of three elements: nonqualified stock options, time-vested Restricted Shares and performance-vested restrictedRestricted Shares. In 2007, awards and grants of long-term incentives to named executive officers were made so that approximately 40 percent, 40 percent and 20 percent of the total value of all long-term incentives were made in the form of time-vested Restricted Shares, performance-vested Restricted Shares and nonqualified stock options, respectively.
          Each grant of nonqualified stock options to our named executive officers in 2007 vests one-third per year over three years commencing one year from the grant date. All options granted have an exercise price equal to the fair market value (average of the high and low sales price) of an Ordinary Share on the date of grant. Each option expires 10 years after the date of its grant.
          Each award of time-vested Restricted Shares to our named executive officers in 2007 vests one-third per year over three years commencing one year from the award date. Prior to vesting, time-vested Restricted Shares may not be sold, transferred or pledged. Holders of time-vested or performance-vested Restricted Share awards are entitled to receive dividends and distributions with respect to the Restricted Shares they hold at the same rate and in the same manner as the holders of the Ordinary Shares.
          Performance-vested Restricted Shares vest based on the achievement of specified corporate performance criteria over a three-year performance cycle. The number of performance-vested Restricted Shares awarded to a participant equals the number of shares that would vest if the maximum level of performance for a given performance cycle is achieved. The number of such shares that vests is determined after the end of the applicable

18


performance period. Any performance-vested Restricted Shares that do not vest are forfeited. Prior to vesting, performance-vested Restricted Shares may not be sold, transferred or pledged.
          In setting the target number of performance-vested Restricted Shares, the compensation committee takes into consideration market data, the award’s impact on total compensation, the performance of the executive during the last completed year, and the potential for further contributions by the executive in the future.
          The terms of the performance-vested Restricted Shares awarded by the compensation committee in February 2007 for the 2007-2009 performance cycle provide that one-half of the total number of Restricted Shares awarded will vest based on a performance measure of cumulative total member (shareholder) return (TSR) for the Ordinary Shares relative to the companies in the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index (the “DJ Index”) and the remaining one-half of the total number of Restricted Shares awarded will vest based on TSR for the Ordinary Shares relative to the companies in the Direct Peer Group. The Company must have positive TSR for the performance cycle for any of the performance-vested Restricted Shares to vest.
          To determine the number of performance-vested Restricted Shares awarded for the 2007-2009 performance cycle that will vest,
First, the percentile ranking of the TSR for Ordinary Shares is computed relative to the companies in the DJ Index at the end of the performance cycle.
Second, the DJ Index percentile ranking is cross-referenced in the table below to determine the percentage of performance-vested Restricted Shares allotted to the DJ Index performance measure that vest for the 2007-2009 performance cycle.
DJ Index Performance Table
TSR for Ordinary SharesPercentage of Restricted
Relative to the DJ IndexShares Vesting (1)
90%tile and greater
(maximum)100.0%
85 %tile88.7%
80 %tile78.0%
75 %tile(target)66.7%
70 %tile62.0%
65 %tile57.3%
60 %tile52.7%
55 %tile47.3%
50 %tile42.7%
45 %tile38.0%
40 %tile(threshold)33.3%
Below 40 %tile0%
(1)Values between those listed are interpolated on a straight line basis. Each percentage represents a percentage of one-half of the total number of Restricted Shares awarded for the maximum level of performance for the 2007-2009 performance cycle.
Third, the percentile ranking of the TSR for Ordinary Shares is computed relative to the companies in the Direct Peer Group at the end of the performance cycle.
Fourth, the Direct Peer Group percentile ranking is cross-referenced in the table below to determine the percentage of performance-vested Restricted Shares allotted to the Direct Peer Group performance measure that vest for the 2007-2009 performance cycle.

19


Direct Peer Group Performance Table
TSR for Ordinary SharesPercentage of Restricted
Relative to the Direct Peer GroupShares Vesting (1)
100 %tile(maximum)100%
87.5 %tile94.4%
75 %tile(target)67.7%
62.5 %tile54.7%
50 %tile42.7%
37.5 %tile(threshold)28.0%
Below 35 %tile0%
(1)Values between those listed are interpolated on a straight line basis. Each percentage represents a percentage of one-half of the total number of Restricted Shares awarded for the maximum level of performance for the 2007-2009 performance cycle.
Finally, the total number of Restricted Shares awarded that will vest is calculated by taking the sum of (i) the number of shares calculated by multiplying the percentage determined in the second bullet point above by one-half of the total number of Restricted Shares awarded for the maximum level of performance for the 2007-2009 performance cycle and (ii) the number of shares calculated by multiplying the percentage determined in the fourth bullet point above by one-half of the total number of Restricted Shares awarded for the maximum level of performance for the 2007-2009 performance cycle. If less than five of the original eight companies comprise the Direct Peer Group at the end of the performance cycle, the total number of Restricted Shares awarded that will vest is calculated by multiplying the percentage determined in the second bullet point above by 100 percent of the total number of Restricted Shares awarded for the maximum level of performance for the 2007-2009 performance cycle.
     The target award levels in the tables above, which significantly influence total compensation, are used because we believe that if the Company performs at or above the 75th percentile relative to the companies in the DJ Index and the Direct Peer Group then our compensation levels should be commensurate with this performance. If the Company performs lower than this, our compensation levels should be lower than the 75th percentile.
          The performance-vested Restricted Shares awarded by the compensation committee in April 2004 for the 2004-2006 performance cycle vested effective February 13, 2007. Performance-vested Restricted Shares for the 2004-2006 performance cycle vested based solely on the performance measure of TSR for the Ordinary Shares relative to the companies in the DJ Index. At the end of the performance period, the percentile ranking of the TSR for Ordinary Shares relative to the companies in the DJ Index was in the 50th percentile, which corresponded to the vesting of 42.7 percent of the outstanding performance-vested Restricted Shares awarded for the 2004-2006 performance cycle. The total number of performance-vested Restricted Shares that vested for those named executive officers who received an award for the 2004-2006 performance cycle were as follows: Ms. Robertson – 7,230 shares; Mr. Campbell – 3,440 shares; Mr. Day – 51,240 shares; and Mr. Jackson – 19,490 shares.
          The total value of the long-term incentive awards is recommended to the compensation committee by our Chief Executive Officer for all positions with the exception of his own. The total value of the awards is developed considering our objectives for this component of total compensation relative to the pay of the companies in the Direct and Broad Energy Peer Groups and is set to correspond with the Direct and Broad Energy Peer Group’s 75th percentile. The compensation committee determines the total award value of the long-term incentive awards for our Chief Executive Officer.
          In 2007, the Black-Scholes option pricing model was used at the time of the grant of nonqualified stock options to named executive officers to calculate the number of options whose value approximated 20 percent of the total value of the long-term incentive awards assigned to a named executive officer. For time-vested restricted shares.Restricted Shares awards awarded in 2007, the market price of the Ordinary Shares at the time of award was used to calculate the number of time-vested Restricted Shares whose value approximated 40 percent of the total value of the long-term incentive awards assigned to a named executive officer. For performance-vested Restricted Shares awards awarded in 2007, the market price of the Ordinary Shares at the time of award, the difficulty in achieving the

20


performance targets and the accounting valuation of the award were used to calculate the number of performance-vested Restricted Shares whose value approximated 40 percent of the total value of the long-term incentive awards assigned to a named executive officer.
          In applying the methodology above, option grants and Restricted Share awards may be adjusted based on considerations of internal equity and individual performance during the prior year. We do not target long-term incentive opportunities to be a particular percentage of total compensation. The Committeecompensation committee granted stock options and awarded performance-vested restricted sharesRestricted Shares and time-vested restricted sharesRestricted Shares in April 20042007 to individuals (including our Chief Executive Officer and the CEO and other named executive officers) who demonstrated superior performance in their current position, as well as the likelihood of high-level performance in the future. The performance-vested restricted shares will vest, if at all, in a range from zero
Compensation Paid to 100 percentInterim Chief Executive Officer
          William A. Sears served as Chairman of the award based on the following performance measure over the 2004-2006 performance cycle: cumulative total member (shareholder) return for the Ordinary Shares relative to the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index. One-third of the time-vested restricted shares vests on each April 20, 2005, 2006 and 2007.

Board, Chief Executive Officer Compensation

     The CEO’sand President of the Company on an interim basis from September 20, 2007 to January 2, 2008. During his term as an officer of the Company, Mr. Sears received an annual base salary is reviewed annually, consistentat the rate of $850,000. Mr. Sears’ base salary was set to correspond with the Company’s salary administration policy for all shore-based employees. The CEO participatesDirect and Broad Energy Peer Group’s 75th percentile because of his background and considerable industry experience. During his term of office, Mr. Sears did not participate in any of our retirement programs or other employee benefit programs.

          In connection with the appointment of Mr. Sears to his offices with the Company, our Board set his 2007 STIP target award level at 100 percent, which was the same compensation planstarget award level as our prior Chief Executive Officer. When the 2007 STIP award payments were made on February 27, 2008, Mr. Sears was no longer an employee and therefore was not eligible under the terms of the 2007 STIP to receive a bonus payment thereunder. Our Board awarded a discretionary bonus to Mr. Sears of $407,767, which represents the amount that are provided to other executives, management and employees within the Company. In considering adjustmentsMr. Sears would have been awarded pursuant to the base salary2007 STIP had he continued to be employed through February 27, 2008. The discretionary bonus was awarded to Mr. Sears in recognition of his service to the Company as interim Chairman of the CEO,Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and his contributions during such term of office towards the Committee reviewsidentification of his successor.
          In connection with Mr. Sears’ appointment, the Company’s financial results, Ordinary Share performancecompensation committee on October 25, 2007 authorized and achievementapproved an award under the 1991 Plan of business objectives for23,081 time-vested Restricted Shares, a portion of which (6,060 shares) was awarded in recognition of shares that he would have otherwise received on the past year. In regardsame date pursuant to the CEO,Second Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Share Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “1992 Plan”) had he been a non-employee director on October 25, 2007. In determining the Committee also considers17,021 time-vested Restricted Shares (23,081 total time-vested Restricted Shares less 6,060 time vested Restricted Shares) awarded to Mr. Sears, the overall achievements made during his tenure, as well as hiscompensation committee consulted with Hewitt, which provided market information for interim officers with backgrounds and experience leadership and guidance providedcomparable to the Company. For example,that of Mr. Sears. The 23,081 time-vested Restricted Shares were later forfeited in the January 2004 issue ofInstitutional Investormagazine, Mr. Day was recognized as the best chief executive officer in the oil services and equipment industry segment, as ranked by portfolio managers and securities analysts at major money management firms and investment banks, for the second consecutive year. The January 2005 issue ofInstitutional Investormagazine recognized Mr. Day again this year as one of the best chief executive officers in the oil services and equipment industry segment.

     Effective February 1, 2004, the CEO’s annual salary was increased to $900,000. The CEO currently receives approximately 14 percent of his base salary in the form of Ordinary Shares as a result of the CEO’s request to have certain previous base salary increases paid in the form of the Company’s equity.

13


     In accordance with the terms of the STIP,award upon the CEOresignation of Mr. Sears as an officer of the Company on January 2, 2008. On February 8, 2008, our Board awarded 6,060 unrestricted Ordinary Shares to Mr. Sears under the 1992 Plan in recognition of the 6,060 shares that would have been awarded to Mr. Sears on October 25, 2007 had he chosen not to serve the Company as interim Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and continued to serve as a non-employee director. Also on February 8, 2008, upon the recommendation of the compensation committee, our Board authorized and approved a payment to Mr. Sears of $85,480. The compensation committee determined to recommend this payment in recognition of Mr. Sears’ service as interim Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company from September 20, 2007 to January 2, 2008 (“Mr. Sears’ period of service”) and the forfeiture of 17,021 time-vested Restricted Shares. The $85,480 amount represented the dollar value of the 17,021 time-vested Restricted Shares awarded on October 25, 2007 (and forfeited on January 2, 2008) prorated over Mr. Sears’ period of service. Mr. Sears subsequently requested that the Company reconsider the compensation committee’s recommendation of the payment of $85,480 and that our Board authorize and approve a payment that represents the current market value of 17,021 Ordinary Shares. The compensation committee determined not to recommend an additional payment.

Retirement and Other Benefits
          We offer retirement programs that are intended to supplement the employee’s personal savings and social security. The programs include the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan, the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan, the Noble

21


Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan, and the Noble Drilling Corporation Profit Sharing Plan. The Company believes that these retirement programs assist the Company in maintaining a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining officers and other employees.
401(k) Savings Plan and 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan.We adopted the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan to enable U.S. employees, including the named executive officers, to save for retirement through a tax-advantaged combination of employee and Company contributions and to provide employees the opportunity to directly manage their retirement plan assets through a variety of investment options. The 401(k) plan allows eligible employees to elect to contribute from one percent to 50 percent of their basic compensation, which is generally the employee’s base pay, to the plan. Employee contributions are matched in cash or Ordinary Shares by us at the rate of $0.70 per $1.00 employee contribution for the first six percent of the employee’s basic compensation. After the employee has completed five years of continuous service as determined under the 401(k) plan (15 years of service for periods of time prior to January 1, 2007), employee contributions are matched in cash or Ordinary Shares by us at the rate of $1.00 per $1.00 employee contribution for the first six percent of the employee’s basic compensation. Vesting in the employer matching contribution account is based on the employee’s years of service with the Company and its affiliates. The amount credited to the employer matching contribution account becomes fully vested upon completion of three years of service by the employee (five years of service for periods of time prior to January 1, 2002). However, regardless of the number of years of service, an employee is fully vested in his employer matching contribution account if the employee retires at age 65 or later or the employee’s employment is terminated due to death or disability.
          The Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan is a nonqualified, unfunded employee benefit plan under which certain highly compensated employees of the Company may elect to defer compensation in excess of amounts deferrable under the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and, subject to certain limitations specified in the plan, receive employer matching contributions. The Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan is discussed in further detail below in this Executive Compensation section following the table captioned “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”
Profit Sharing Plan.The Noble Drilling Corporation Profit Sharing Plan is a qualified defined contribution plan. This plan excludes as participants any employee hired prior to August 1, 2004 or any employee who participates in the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan (in which participation was awardeddiscontinued effective July 31, 2004 for persons commencing employment after that date). Each year we may elect to make a bonusdiscretionary contribution to the plan. Any such contribution would be an amount determined and authorized for the plan year by our Board and the board of $1,072,500directors of Noble Drilling Corporation, a Delaware corporation wholly-owned by direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company. The total plan contribution, if any, is allocated to each participant in 2005, relativethe plan based on such employee’s basic compensation, which is generally the employee’s base pay, in proportion to the total basic compensation of all participants in the plan. For the 2007 plan year, each participant was allocated a contribution equal to five percent of their basic compensation. Vesting in the profit sharing account is based on the employee’s years of service with the Company and its affiliates. An employee’s profit sharing account becomes fully vested upon completion of three years of service by the employee. However, regardless of the number of years of service, an employee is fully vested in his employer matching contribution account if the employee retires at age 65 or later or the employee’s employment is terminated due to death or disability.
Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan and Retirement Restoration Plan.Participation in the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan (and the related unfunded, nonqualified Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan) remains in effect for all participants hired before July 31, 2004. In general, our U.S. salaried employees, including the named executive officers who are participants, are provided with income for their retirement through the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan, a qualified defined benefit pension plan, in which benefits are determined by years of service and average monthly compensation. Compensation in excess of the annual compensation limit as defined by the Internal Revenue Service for a given year is considered in the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan. Because benefits under the pension plan increase with an employee’s period of service, we believe the pension encourages participants to make long-term commitments to the Company, and as such, serves as an important means by which the Company can retain executives and other employees. The Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan and Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan are discussed in further detail below in this Executive Compensation section following the table captioned “Pension Benefits.”

22


Other Benefits.The Company provides named executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that the Company and the compensation committee believe are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program. Attributed costs of perquisites for the named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2007 are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
          The Company provides healthcare, life and disability insurance, and other employee benefit programs to its employees, including its named executive officers, which the Company believes assists in maintaining a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining officers and other employees. These employee benefits plans are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to all employees.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
          We encourage all our executives to align their interests with our members by making a personal investment in the Ordinary Shares. The Company’s minimum ownership guidelines for our executives are set forth below. The named executive officers participate in pay grade levels 33 through 37. We expect that each of our executives will meet these minimum guidelines within five years of when the guidelines first apply to him or her.
Ownership Guidelines
Pay Grade Level(Multiple of Base Salary)
Pay Grade 375.0 times
Pay Grades 34 through 364.0 times
Pay Grades 31 through 333.5 times
Pay Grades 28 through 302.5 times
Pay Grade 272.0 times
Pay Grade 261.5 times
Determination of Timing of Equity-Based Awards
          The Company’s practice historically has been to award Restricted Shares and grant options in connection with the hire date of new executives or at a regularly-scheduled quarterly meeting of the compensation committee following the public release of the immediately preceding quarter’s financial results and any other material nonpublic information.
Change of Control Arrangements
          The named executive officers serving at December 31, 2007 (other than William A. Sears) are parties to change of control employment agreements which we have offered to certain senior executives since 1998. These agreements become effective only upon a change of control (within the meaning set forth in the agreement). If a defined change of control occurs and the employment of the named executive officer is terminated either by us (for reasons other than death, disability or cause) or by the officer (for good reason or upon the officer’s determination to leave without any reason during the 30-day period immediately following the first anniversary of the change of control), which requirements can be referred to as a “double trigger”, the executive officer will receive payments and benefits set forth in the agreement. The terms of the agreements are summarized in this proxy statement under the caption “Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control – Change of Control Employment Agreements.” We believe a “double trigger” requirement, rather than a “single trigger” requirement (which would be satisfied if a change of control occurs and the named executive officer is terminated for any reason or determines to leave during the first year after the change of control), maximizes member value because it prevents an unintended windfall to the named executive officers in the event of a friendly (non-hostile) change of control.
Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments of Compensation
          Prior to 2004, performance.the accounting and tax treatments of compensation generally were not a material consideration in determining the design or amounts of pay for named executive officers. In accordance withApril 2004, the terms of thecompensation committee implemented a revised equity-based long-term incentive compensation program for executive officers and key employees, in April 2004, the Committee granted the CEO a nonqualified option to purchase 50,000 Ordinaryconsisting of three elements: performance-vested Restricted Shares, time-vested Restricted Shares and awardednonqualified stock options. In recent years the compensation committee has increased the proportion of annual long-term incentive compensation to our named executive officers represented in the CEO 60,000 Ordinaryform of Restricted Shares as compared to nonqualified stock options. This compensation committee action reflects

23


various proposals to adopt, and the ultimate adoption, during such time period of performance-vested restrictednew accounting standards modifying the accounting treatment of nonqualified stock options. In 2007, the compensation committee further reduced the percentage of total value of all long-term incentives represented by nonqualified stock option awards from 33 percent to 20 percent and 40,000 Ordinaryincreased the percentage of total value of all long-term incentives represented by Restricted Shares of time-vested restricted stock.

Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation

from 66 percent to 80 percent.

           Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally limits the tax deductibility to public companies for compensation in excess of $1 million per person per year, unless such compensation meets certain specific requirements. The Committee’scompensation committee’s intent is to structure compensation awards that will be deductible without limitation where doing so will further the purposes of the Company’s executive compensation programs. The Committeecompensation committee also considers it important to retain flexibility to design compensation programs, even where compensation payable under such programs may not be fully deductible, if such programs effectively recognize a full range of criteria important to the Company’s success and result in a gain to the Company that would outweigh the limited negative tax effect.
Board Process and Independent Review of Compensation Program
           The compensation committee is responsible for determining the compensation of our directors and executive officers, including the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers, and for assisting our Board in reviewing and administering the compensation programs, benefits, incentive and equity-based compensation plans. In addition, the compensation committee is authorized to exercise all the powers granted to it in its charter. The compensation committee charter provides that the compensation committee will have access to the necessary corporate resources to carry out its charter authority.
           The compensation committee may delegate its authority to an officer of the Company subject to restrictions on participants in compensation plans determining their own benefits. In addition, the compensation committee may form one or more subcommittees and delegate its authority to any such subcommittee, as it deems appropriate.
           The compensation committee charter authorizes the compensation committee to retain and terminate, as the compensation committee deems necessary, independent advisors to provide advice and evaluation of the compensation or employment of directors or executive officers, or other matters relating to compensation, benefits, incentive and equity-based compensation plans and corporate performance. The compensation committee is further authorized to approve the fees and retention terms of any independent advisor that it retains. Pursuant to the authority granted to it in its charter, the compensation committee has retained Hewitt as an advisor regarding compensation matters. In 2007, Hewitt reviewed the Company’s compensation program and policies, attended meetings from time to time with the compensation committee at the committee’s request, and presented reports thereon to the compensation committee.
           For our Chief Executive Officer, the compensation committee evaluates and assesses our Chief Executive Officer’s performance related to leadership, financial and operating results, board relations, and other material considerations. These considerations as well as compensation market information are then incorporated into the compensation committee’s compensation adjustment decisions. Market information and perspectives on market-based adjustments are provided by Hewitt.
           For executive officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer), our Chief Executive Officer works with Hewitt and our Executive Vice President to review compensation market information, to review prior compensation decisions and to recommend compensation adjustments to the compensation committee at the compensation committee’s first meeting of each year (late January or early February). Our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President may attend compensation committee meetings at the request of the compensation committee. The compensation committee reviews and approves all compensation adjustments for the named executive officers.
           Hewitt acts at the direction of the compensation committee and independent of management. The compensation committee determines Hewitt’s ongoing engagement activities related to executive compensation consulting, including the preparation of compensation comparisons based on information regarding comparable businesses of a similar size and operational scope to the Company. Hewitt also endeavors to keep the compensation committee informed of executive compensation trends and regulatory/compliance developments.
           The following compensation committee report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s proxy rules, except for the required disclosure herein or in the Annual

24


Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “2007 Form 10-K”), or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and such information shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
CompensationCommittee Report
To the Members of
Noble Corporation:
           The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management of the Company the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement. Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
     
March 11, 2005 20, 2008COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Luke R. Corbett, Chair

Michael A. Cawley, Chair
Luke R. Corbett
Marc E. Leland
 
 
   
   
   

1425


     

           The following table showssets forth the compensation of the persons who served as our Chief Executive Officer during 2007, the person who served as our Chief Financial Officer during 2007, and each of ourthe other executive officers of the Company who we have determined are our named executive officers pursuant to the applicable rules of the SEC (collectively, the “named executive officers”). See the Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation beginning on page 12 of this proxy statement for an explanation of our compensation policies and programs.

Summary Compensation Table
                                 
                  Long-Term Compensation Awards    
                          Value of    
      Annual Compensation      Securities  Long    
              Other      Underlying  Term  All 
              Annual  Restricted  Options  Incentive  Other 
Name and             Compen  Stock  (number of  Plan Pay-  Compen 
Principal Position Year  Salary  Bonus  -sation  Awards(1)  shares) (2)  Outs  -sation 
James C. Day  2004  $889,583  $1,072,500  $8,784  $3,713,000   50,000  $0  $24,357(3)
Chairman,Chief Executive
  2003  $775,000  $550,000  $7,818  $0   0  $2,036,520  $19,448 
Officer and President  2002  $775,000  $913,750  $7,855  $0   180,000  $2,274,211  $15,374 
                                 
Mark A. Jackson  2004  $360,417  $325,000  $0  $1,412,314   18,407  $0  $9,853(4)
Chief Operating Officer, Senior  2003  $310,000  $200,000  $0  $0   0  $281,090  $8,400 
Vice President, Chief Financial  2002  $310,000  $280,000  $0  $0   75,000  $253,840  $8,400 
Officer                                
                                 
Danny W. Adkins  2004  $273,333  $275,000  $0  $523,904   8,998  $0  $10,177(4)
Senior Vice President –  2003  $255,000  $125,000  $0  $0   0  $736,368  $8,459 
Operations, Noble Drilling  2002  $255,000  $280,000  $0  $0   75,000  $752,985  $8,400 
Corporation                                
                                 
Julie J. Robertson  2004  $282,083  $275,000  $0  $523,904   8,998  $0  $15,971(4)
Senior Vice President –  2003  $250,000  $125,000  $0  $0   0  $662,400  $12,000 
Administration and  2002  $250,000  $280,000  $0  $0   75,000  $682,933  $11,000 
Corporate Secretary                                
                                     
                          Change in    
                          Pension Value    
                       and Non-    
                      Non-Equity Qualified    
                      Incentive Deferred    
                      Plan Compen-    
Name and Principal             Stock Option Compen- sation All Other  
Position Year Salary Bonus (1) Awards (2) Awards (2) sation (1) Earnings (3) Compensation Total
David W. Williams  2007  $489,583  $375,000  $1,589,245  $394,841  $262,500  $0  $24,756 (4) $3,135,925 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, and former Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (4)                                    
                                     
Julie J. Robertson  2007  $422,917  $468,750 (5) $962,091  $314,976  $223,125  $165,017  $20,471 (5) $2,577,347 
Executive Vice  2006  $397,083  $297,500  $675,418  $248,218  $262,500  $154,292  $18,896  $2,053,907 
President and Corporate Secretary                                    
                                     
Thomas L. Mitchell  2007  $400,000  $240,000  $1,305,691  $336,446  $210,000  $0  $33,094 (6) $2,525,231 
Senior Vice President,  2006  $62,885  $100,000 (6) $143,903  $40,106  $0  $0  $4,824  $351,718 
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller (6)                                    
                                     
Robert D. Campbell  2007  $313,750  $128,725  $410,450  $131,238  $121,275  $51,910  $18,137 (7) $1,175,485 
Senior Vice President and  2006  $299,167  $155,625  $374,623  $104,421  $144,375  $88,493  $13,238  $1,179,942 
General Counsel                                    
                                     
William A. Sears  2007  $234,159  $407,767 (8) $224,443  $0  $0  $0  $25,312 (8) $891,681 
Former Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (8)                                    
                                     
James C. Day  2007  $358,325 (9) $0  $1,854,645  $1,168,320  $0  $0  $18,732 (9) $3,400,022 
Former Chairman of the Board (9)  2006  $946,735 (9) $948,750  $2,546,561  $858,904  $831,250  $1,125,171  $70,089  $7,327,460 
                                     
Mark A. Jackson  2007  $595,693 (10) $0  $1,960,452  $1,321,690  $0  $151,035  $1,431,338 (10) $5,460,208 
Former Chairman of the Board,  2006  $604,367 (10) $679,375  $1,060,749  $395,957  $590,625  $108,415  $16,293  $3,455,781 
Chief Executive Officer and President (10)                                    


(1) Dollar values of restricted Ordinary Shares (“Restricted Shares”)The cash Performance Bonuses awarded on April 20, 2004 are based on the closing price of the Ordinary Shares ($37.13) on that date, and represent the following number of shares: Mr. Day – 60,000 performance-vested and 40,000 time-vested; Mr. Jackson – 22,822 performance-vested and 15,215 time-vested; Mr. Adkins – 8,466 performance-vested and 5,644 time-vested; and Ms. Robertson – 8,466 performance-vested and 5,644 time-vested. The performance-vested Restricted Shares will vest, if at all, in a range from zero to 100 percent of the award based on the following performance measure over the 2004-2006 performance cycle: cumulative total member (shareholder) return for the Ordinary Shares relativepursuant to the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index. One-third ofSTIP are disclosed in the time-vested Restricted Shares vests on each April 20, 2005, 2006Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column and 2007. Delivery of the Restricted Shares (and any dividends paid on the Ordinary Shares) is subject to vesting/forfeiture provisions, continuous employment of the awardee by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and, with respectcash Discretionary Bonuses awarded pursuant to the performance-vested Restricted Shares,STIP are disclosed in the Bonus column. Except as otherwise noted, the amounts disclosed in the Bonus column represent Discretionary Bonuses awarded pursuant to the extent of the achievement of the performance measure described above. The total number of Restricted Shares held, and their aggregate value at December 31, 2004, were as follows: Mr. Day – 149,000 shares valued at $7,411,260; Mr. Jackson – 49,037 shares valued at $2,439,100; Mr. Adkins – 27,110 shares valued at $1,348,451; and Ms. Robertson – 27,110 shares valued at $1,348,451.STIP.
 
(2) Options representRepresents the rightdollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to purchase Ordinarythe applicable fiscal year in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. For the awards reported in these columns, estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions have been disregarded. A description of the assumptions made in our valuation of stock and option awards is set forth in Note 6 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Form 10-K. For the award to Mr. Sears, due to his appointment as

26


an officer on an interim basis, his service period for purposes of determining the dollar amount recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 123R was 366 days and not the three-year vesting period under his award. Effective February 13, 2007, the following performance-vested Restricted Shares atfor the 2004-2006 performance cycle did not vest and were forfeited based on the performance measures for these awards: Ms. Robertson – 9,702; Mr. Campbell – 4,614; Mr. Day – 68,760; and Mr. Jackson – 26,154. As a fixed price per share.result of Mr. Day’s retirement on April 30, 2007, the performance-vested Restricted Shares awarded to him for the 2005-2007 and 2006-2008 performance cycles were reduced resulting in the forfeiture of 54,054 shares. Effective upon Mr. Jackson’s resignation on September 20, 2007, all performance-vested Restricted Shares, which totaled 227,466 shares, held by him for the 2005-2007, 2006-2008 and 2007-2009 performance cycles were forfeited.
 
(3) Other Annual Compensation consistsFor 2007, the amounts in this column represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of club dueseach named executive officer’s accumulated benefit under the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan and All Other Compensation consiststhe Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007. For 2007, the actuarial present value of company contributionsMr. Day’s accumulated benefit under these plans decreased by $7,272,769. For 2006, the amounts in this column represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of each named executive officer’s accumulated benefit under the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan from December 31, 2005 to defined contribution plan (and unfunded, nonqualified excess benefit plan), term life insurance premiumsDecember 31, 2006. For 2007 and directors’ fees, respectively,2006, none of $15,980, $7,777 and $600.the named executive officers received above-market or preferential earnings on compensation that was deferred on a basis that was not tax-qualified.
 
(4) On January 2, 2008, Mr. Williams was appointed as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. Compensation amounts for the full year are reflected in this Summary Compensation Table, including the period prior to April 25, 2007, which is the date that Mr. Williams became an executive officer of the Company. The amount in All Other Compensation includes $10,850 in Company contributions to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan and $12,678, which represents dividends paid by the Company in 2007 on Restricted Shares held by Mr. Williams.
(5)The amount in Bonus includes a discretionary cash bonus of $150,000 awarded to Ms. Robertson on October 25, 2007. This bonus was not awarded pursuant to the STIP. The amount in All Other Compensation includes $15,500 in Company contributions to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan.
(6)Mr. Mitchell joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller effective November 6, 2006. For 2006, the amount in Bonus consists of companya discretionary cash bonus awarded by the compensation committee. This bonus was not awarded pursuant to the STIP. The amount in All Other Compensation includes $10,850 in Company contributions to defined contributionthe Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan and $11,250, which represents the amount allocated to Mr. Mitchell pursuant to the Profit Sharing Plan for the 2007 plan (and unfunded, nonqualified excess benefit plan) and term life insurance premiums, respectively, as follows: Mr. Jackson – $9,853 and $0; Mr. Adkins – $9,791 and $386; and Ms. Robertson – $15,971 and $ 0.year.
(7)The amount in All Other Compensation includes $15,500 in Company contributions to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan.
(8)Mr. Sears served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company on an interim basis from September 20, 2007 to January 2, 2008. The compensation amounts for services performed by Mr. Sears as an officer of the Company from September 20, 2007 to December 31, 2007 are reflected in this Summary Compensation Table. The amount in Bonus includes a discretionary cash bonus of $407,767 awarded to Mr. Sears on February 8, 2008, which represents the amount that Mr. Sears would have been awarded pursuant to the 2007 STIP had he continued to be employed through the date on which the 2007 STIP award payments were made. The amount in All Other Compensation includes $13,400 in housing expenses paid by the Company and $10,989 in tax reimbursement paid by the Company, which represents the amount of taxes due on the amount reimbursed to Mr. Sears for his housing expenses.
(9)Effective April 30, 2007, Mr. Day retired from the Company and our Board. For 2007, the amount in Salary includes $58,333 that was deferred in the form of Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan and $300 in director’s fees. For 2006, the amount in Salary includes $175,000 that was deferred in the form of Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan and $900 in director’s fees. For 2007, the amount in All Other Compensation includes

1527


$15,500 in Company contributions to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan.
(10)Effective September 20, 2007, Mr. Jackson resigned his positions as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of the Company. The amount in Salary includes $500 and $200 in director’s fees for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For 2007, the amount in All Other Compensation includes $1,312,500 paid pursuant to a separation agreement and release entered into by the Company and Mr. Jackson. This agreement is further described in this proxy statement under the caption “Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control – Separation Agreement and Release.” For 2007, the amount in All Other Compensation also includes: $11,904 in Company contributions to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan; $85,000, which represents the amount by which matching charitable contributions by the Company under the Noble Corporation Matching Gift Program exceeded the $15,000 annual maximum limit available to all employees for such contributions under the program; air travel and hotel expenses paid by the Company in connection with family members accompanying Mr. Jackson on business trips; and the incremental cost to the Company for the use of Company aircraft.

28


           The following table sets forth certain information with respect to options to purchase Ordinary Shares grantedgrants of plan-based awards during the year ended December 31, 20042007 to each of the named executive officers (no stock appreciation rights (SARs) were granted).officers.

O

ptionGrants of Plan – Based Awards/SAR Grants in2004
                                          
 All    
                         Other    
 Individual Grants    Stock All Other  
 Number of      Awards: Option Grant
 Securities Percent of    Estimated Possible Payouts Estimated Future Payouts Number Awards: Exercise Date Fair
 Underlying Total Potential Realizable Value at  Under Non-Equity Incentive Under Equity Incentive of Number of or Base Value of
 Options/SARS Options/SARS Exercise Assumed Annual Rates of Stock  Plan Awards (1) Plan Awards (2) Shares Securities Price of Stock and
 Granted Granted to Price Price Appreciation for  Maxi- Maxi- of Stock Underlying Option Option
 (number of Employees Per Option Term (1)  Grant Thresh Target mum Thresh Target mum or Units Options (#) Awards Awards
Name shares) In 2004 Share Expiration Date 5% (2) 10% (2)  Date -old ($) ($) ($) -old (#) (#) (#) (#) (3) (4) ($/Sh) (4) (5)
David W. Williams February 13           0   53,189   79,150           $1,078,722 
 February 13                    20,118        $720,023 
 February 13                       27,460  $35.79  $360,001 
  $0  $187,500  $375,000                      
                                
Julie J. Robertson February 13           0   44,324   65,958           $898,931 
 February 13                    16,764        $599,984 
 February 13                       22,884  $35.79  $300,009 
  $0  $159,375  $318,750                      
                                
Thomas L. Mitchell February 13           0   35,459   52,766           $719,139 
 February 13                    13,412        $480,015 
 February 13                       18,306  $35.79  $239,992 
  $0  $150,000  $300,000                      
                                
Robert D. Campbell February 13           0   19,207   28,582           $389,539 
 February 13                    7,264        $259,979 
 February 13                       9,916  $35.79  $129,999 
  $0  $86,625  $173,250                      
                                
William A. Sears October 25                    23,081        $1,226,063 
                                
James C. Day  50,000(3)  17.9% $37.57 April 19, 2014 $1,181,500 $2,994,000                                
                                
Mark A. Jackson  18,407(3)  6.6% $37.57 April 19, 2014 $434,957 $1,102,211  February 13           0   106,378   158,300           $2,157,444 
Danny W. Adkins  8,998(3)  3.2% $37.57 April 19, 2014 $212,623 $538,800 
Julie J. Robertson  8,998(3)  3.2% $37.57 April 19, 2014 $212,623 $538,800 
 February 13                    40,234        $1,439,975 
 February 13                       54,920  $35.79  $720,001 


(1) The values shown are based onRepresents the indicated assumed annual rates of appreciation compounded annually. Actual gains realized, if any, on stock option exercises and Ordinary Share holdings are dependent on future performancedollar value of the Ordinary Sharesapplicable range (threshold, target and overall stock market conditions. There can be no assurance thatmaximum amounts) of Performance Bonuses awarded pursuant to the values shownSTIP for the 2007 plan year. The amounts of the Performance Bonus awards made to the named executive officers pursuant to the STIP for the 2007 plan year are set forth in this table will be achieved.the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
 
(2) Reflects an assumed market price per Ordinary Share of $61.20 at 5 percent and $97.45 at 10 percent.Represents performance-vested Restricted Shares awarded during the year ended December 31, 2007 pursuant to the 1991 Plan.
 
(3) Represents time-vested Restricted Shares awarded during the year ended December 31, 2007 pursuant to the 1991 Plan.
(4)Represents nonqualified stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2007 pursuant to the 1991 Plan. The exercise price for these nonqualified stock options of $35.79 represents the fair market value per share on the date of grant as specified in the 1991 Plan (average of the high and low prices of the Ordinary Shares). This exercise price is less than the closing market price on the date of grant, February 13, 2007, of $35.825.
(5)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the award computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
           For a description of the material terms of the awards reported in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table, including performance-based conditions and vesting schedules applicable to such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – How Amounts for Compensation Components are Determined.”

29


           The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2007 held by the named executive officers.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
                                 
  Option Awards (1) Stock Awards
                          Equity Equity
                          Incentive Incentive Plan
                      Market Plan Awards:
                      Value of Awards: Market or
                  Number of Shares or Number of Payout Value
  Number of Number of         Shares or Units of Unearned of Unearned
  Securities Securities         Units of Stock Shares, Units Shares, Units
  Underlying Underlying         Stock That That or Other or Other
  Unexercised Unexercised Option     Have Not Have Not Rights That Rights That
  Options (#) Options (#) Exercise Option Vested (#) Vested ($) Have Not Have Not
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Price ($) Expiration Date (2) (3) Vested (#) (4) Vested ($) (3)
David W. Williams     27,460 (5) $35.79  February 13, 2017  86,785 (6) $4,904,220   53,189 (7) $3,005,710 
   33,333   66,667 (8) $31.505  September 20, 2016            
                                 
Julie J. Robertson     22,884 (5) $35.79  February 13, 2017  30,236 (9) $1,708,636   76,580 (10) $4,327,536 
   7,916   15,836 (11) $37.925  February 2, 2016            
   22,666   11,334 (12) $26.46  April 27, 2015            
   17,996     $18.78  April 20, 2014            
   150,000     $15.60  July 25, 2012            
   100,000     $15.55  July 26, 2011            
   100,000     $21.205  October 26, 2010            
   90,000     $10.72  October 28, 2009            
   90,000     $  7.8125  October 22, 2008            
   40,000     $10.8125  July 23, 2008            
                                 
Thomas L. Mitchell     18,306 (5) $35.79  February 13, 2017  66,746 (13) $3,771,816   35,459 (14) $2,003,788 
   26,666   53,334 (15) $35.495  November 6, 2016            
                                 
Robert D. Campbell     9,916 (5) $35.79  February 13, 2017  12,640 (16) $714,286   33,269 (17) $1,880,031 
   0   4,186 (11) $37.925  February 2, 2016            
   0   6,200 (12) $26.46  April 27, 2015            
                                 
William A. Sears  4,000     $41.25  April 28, 2016  31,083 (18) $1,756,500       
   4,000     $26.62  April 29, 2015            
   15,000     $18.93  April 23, 2014            
   15,000     $16.055  April 25, 2013            
   15,000     $21.34  April 26, 2012            
   10,000     $23.845  April 27, 2011            
   7,000     $18.360  April 28, 2010            
   7,000     $  8.913  April 24, 2009            
   20,000     $16.25  April 24, 2008            
                                 
James C. Day  71,152     $37.925  April 30, 2012        63,870 (19) $3,609,294 
   102,800     $26.46  April 30, 2012            
   100,000     $18.78  April 30, 2012            
   116,400     $15.60  April 30, 2012            
                                 
Mark A. Jackson  54,920     $35.79  March 20, 2008            
   7,240     $41.10  March 20, 2008            
   31,390     $37.925  March 20, 2008            
   42,672     $26.46  March 20, 2008            
   25,000     $24.405  March 20, 2008            
(1)For each named executive officer (except Mr. Sears), represents nonqualified stock options granted pursuant to the 1991 Plan. For Mr. Sears, represents nonqualified stock options granted pursuant to the 1992 Plan.
(2)Except as otherwise noted, the numbers in this column represent a single granttime-vested Restricted Shares awarded pursuant to the 1991 Plan.
(3)The market value was computed by multiplying the closing market price of optionsthe Ordinary Shares at fiscal year-end 2007 ($56.51) times the number of shares that have not vested.
(4)The numbers in this column represent performance-vested Restricted Shares and are calculated based on April 20, 2004. achieving the applicable target performance goal.

30


(5)One-third of the options becomesgranted became exercisable on February 13, 2008. An additional one-third of the options become exercisable on each of February 13, 2009 and 2010.
(6)Of these shares, 6,706 vested on February 13, 2008; 33,333 will vest on September 20, 2008; 6,706 will vest on February 13, 2009; 33,334 will vest on September 20, 2009; and 6,706 will vest on February 13, 2010.
(7)Consists of 53,189 performance-vested Restricted Shares that will vest, if at all, based on the applicable performance measure over the 2007-2009 performance cycle.
(8)One-third of the options granted became exercisable on September 20, 2007. An additional one-third of the options become exercisable on each of September 20, 2008 and 2009.
(9)Of these shares, 3,736 vested on February 2, 2008; 5,588 vested on February 13, 2008; 6,000 will vest on April 27, 2008; 3,736 will vest on February 2, 2009; 5,588 will vest on February 13, 2009; and 5,588 will vest on February 13, 2010.
(10)Includes 44,324 and 13,856 performance-vested Restricted Shares that will vest, if at all, based on the applicable performance measure over the 2007-2009 performance cycle and the 2006-2008 performance cycle, respectively. Also includes 18,400 performance-vested Restricted Shares for the 2005-2007 performance cycle of which, effective February 7, 2008, 15,586 shares vested and the remaining shares for such performance cycle were forfeited.
(11)One-third of the options granted became exercisable on each of February 2, 2007 and 2008. The remaining one-third of the options granted become exercisable on February 2, 2009.
(12)One-third of the options granted became exercisable on each of April 20, 2005,27, 2006 and 2007. The remaining one-third of the options granted become exercisable on April 27, 2008.
(13)Of these shares, 4,470 vested on February 13, 2008; 26,667 will vest on November 6, 2008; 4,471 will vest on February 13, 2009; 26,667 will vest on November 6, 2009; and 4,471 will vest on February 13, 2010.
(14)Consists of 35,459 performance-vested Restricted Shares that will vest, if at all, based on the applicable performance measure over the 2007-2009 performance cycle.
(15)One-third of the options granted became exercisable on November 6, 2007. An additional one-third of the options become exercisable on each of November 6, 2008 and 2009.
(16)Of these shares, 988 vested on February 2, 2008 and 2,421 vested on February 13, 2008; 3,400 will vest on April 27, 2008; 988 will vest on February 2, 2009; 2,421 will vest on February 13, 2009; and 2,422 will vest on February 13, 2010.
(17)Includes 19,207 and 3,662 performance-vested Restricted Shares that will vest, if at all, based on the applicable performance measure over the 2007-2009 performance cycle and the 2006-2008 performance cycle, respectively. Also includes 10,400 performance-vested Restricted Shares for the 2005-2007 performance cycle of which, effective February 7, 2008, 8,809 shares vested and the remaining shares for such performance cycle were forfeited.
(18)Of these shares, 23,081 were awarded on October 25, 2007 pursuant to the 1991 Plan and were later forfeited in accordance with the terms of the award agreement for these shares upon the resignation of Mr. Sears as an officer of the Company on January 2, 2008. The remaining 8,002 shares were awarded under the 1992 Plan and, of these shares, 2,667 will vest on April 28, 2008; 2,668 will vest on April 29, 2008; and 2,667 will be forfeited on the date of Mr. Sears’ retirement from our Board unless our Board, in its discretion, determines to remove the restrictions on vesting.
(19)Includes 18,447 performance-vested Restricted Shares that will vest, if at all, based on the applicable performance measure over the 2006-2008 performance cycle. Also includes 45,423 performance-vested Restricted Shares for the 2005-2007 performance cycle of which, effective February 7, 2008, 38,475 shares vested and the remaining shares for such performance cycle were forfeited.

31


           The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the amounts received upon the exercise of options to purchase Ordinaryor the vesting of Restricted Shares and SARs during the year ended December 31, 2004, and the unexercised options held at December 31, 2004 and the value thereof, by2007 for each of the named executive officers.officers on an aggregated basis.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested
                 
  Option Awards (1) Stock Awards (1)
  Number of Shares     Number of Shares Value Realized
  Acquired on Value Realized on Acquired on on Vesting
Name Exercise (#) Exercise ($)(2) Vesting (#)(3) ($)(3)
David W. Williams        33,333  $1,648,317 (4)
           ��     
Julie J. Robertson  120,000  $4,496,457   20,730  $813,211 (5)
                 
Thomas L. Mitchell        26,666  $1,502,362 (6)
                 
Robert D. Campbell  432,584  $15,746,102   9,616  $380,671 (7)
                 
William A. Sears        5,332  $232,448 (8)
                 
James C. Day  493,600  $15,955,833   145,086  $5,712,536 (9)
                 
Mark A. Jackson  140,000  $4,541,191   106,098  $4,769,595 (10)
(1)Represents Restricted Share awards and non-qualified stock option grants under the 1991 Plan for each named executive officer, except for the amounts reported under the Stock Awards column for William A. Sears which represent shares acquired upon the vesting of restricted Ordinary Shares issued under the 1992 Plan.
(2)The value is based on the difference in the market price of the Ordinary Shares at the time of exercise and the exercise price of the options.
(3)The value is based on the closing market price of the Ordinary Shares on the vesting date multiplied by the aggregate number of shares that vested on such date.
(4)Vesting occurred on September 20, 2007. The closing market price per Ordinary Share on that date was $49.45.
(5)Of these shares, 3,736 shares vested on February 2, 2007, with a value of $141,520 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $37.88 on that date); 7,230 shares vested on February 13, 2007, with a value of $259,015 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $35.825 on that date); 3,764 shares vested on April 20, 2007, with a value of $151,106 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $40.145 on that date); and 6,000 shares vested on April 27, 2007, with a value of $261,570 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $43.595 on that date).
(6)Vesting occurred on November 6, 2007. The closing market price per Ordinary Share on that date was $56.34.
(7)Of these shares, 986 shares vested on February 2, 2007, with a value of $37,350 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $37.88 on that date); 3,440 shares vested on February 13, 2007, with a value of $123,238 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $35.825 on that date); 1,790 shares vested on April 20, 2007, with a value of $71,860 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $40.145 on that date); and 3,400 shares vested on April 27, 2007, with a value of $148,223 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $43.595 on that date).
(8)Of these shares, 2,666 shares vested on April 28, 2007, with a value of $116,224 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $43.595 on April 27, 2007); and 2,666 shares vested on April 29, 2007, with a value of $116,224 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $43.595 on April 27, 2007).

AggregatedOption/SAR Exercisesin2004
and12/31/04 Option/SAR Values

                         
  Shares           
  Acquired      Number of Securities  Value of Unexercised In-the- 
  on Exercise      Underlying Unexercised Options/SARs at  Money Options/SARs at 
  (number of  Value  12/31/04 (shares)  12/31/04 
Name shares)  Realized  Exercisable  Unexercisable  Exercisable  Unexercisable 
James C. Day  0   0   610,834   110,000  $11,202,465  $1,721,400 
Mark A. Jackson  45,000  $736,598   115,000   43,407  $811,350  $687,697 
Danny W. Adkins  232,667  $4,451,338   80,000   33,998  $866,650  $573,096 
Julie J. Robertson  0   0   342,000   33,998  $7,552,900  $573,096 

1632


Defined Benefit Plans

     Our
(9)Of these shares, 11,192 shares vested on February 2, 2007, with a value of $423,953 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $37.88 on that date); 51,240 shares vested on February 13, 2007, with a value of $1,835,673 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $35.825 on that date); 26,668 shares vested on April 20, 2007, with a value of $1,070,587 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $40.145 on that date); 16,800 shares vested on April 27, 2007, with a value of $732,396 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $43.595 on that date); and 39,186 shares vested on April 30, 2007, with a value of $1,649,927 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $42.105 on that date).
(10)Of these shares, 4,938 shares vested on February 2, 2007, with a value of $187,051 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $37.88 on that date); 19,490 shares vested on February 13, 2007, with a value of $698,229 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $35.825 on that date); 10,144 shares vested on April 20, 2007, with a value of $407,231 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $40.145 on that date); 1,138 shares vested on April 26, 2007, with a value of $49,093 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $43.14 on that date); 9,000 shares vested on April 27, 2007, with a value of $392,355 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $43.595 on that date); and 61,388 shares vested on September 20, 2007, with a value of $3,035,636 (based on a closing market price per Ordinary Share of $49.45 on that date).

           The following table sets forth certain information with respect to retirement payments and benefits under defined benefit plans for each of the named executive officers.
Pension Benefits
               
    Number    
    of Years Present  
    Credited Value of Payments
    Service Accumulated During Last
    (#) Benefit ($) Fiscal Year
Name Plan Name (1) (1)(2) ($)
David W. Williams (3)          
               
Julie J. Robertson Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan  19.000  $233,925  $0 
  Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan  19.000  $613,488  $0 
               
Thomas L. Mitchell (3)          
               
Robert D. Campbell Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan  9.000  $187,493  $0 
  Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan  9.000  $406,676  $0 
               
William A. Sears (3)          
               
James C. Day Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan  29.455  $909,327  $40,373 
  Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan  29.455  $0  $10,743,991 
               
Mark A. Jackson Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan  7.052  $86,875  $0 
  Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan  7.052  $371,267  $0 
(1)Computed as of December 31, 2007, which is the same pension plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the 2007 Form 10-K.
(2)For purposes of calculating the amounts in this column, retirement age was assumed to be the normal retirement age of 65, as defined in the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan. A description of the valuation method and all material assumptions applied in quantifying the present value of accumulated benefit is set forth in Note 9 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Form 10-K.
(3)Not a participant in the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan and the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan as of December 31, 2007.

33


           Under the Noble Drilling Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan (and the related unfunded, nonqualified Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan), the normal retirement date is the date that cover our executive officers provide the benefits shown below.participant attains the age of 65. The estimates assumeplan covers salaried employees, but excludes certain categories of salaried employees including any employees hired after July 31, 2004. A participant’s date of hire is the date such participant first performs an hour of service for the Company or its subsidiaries, regardless of any subsequent periods of employment or periods of separation from employment with the Company or its subsidiaries. David W. Williams was employed by a subsidiary of the Company from May to December 1994. Pursuant to the terms of the plan, Mr. Williams became a participant of the plan effective January 1, 2008, upon completion of a requisite period of employment.
           A participant who is employed by the Company or any of its affiliated companies on or after his or her normal retirement date (the date that benefits are receivedthe participant attains the age of 65) shall be eligible for a normal retirement pension upon the earlier of his or her required beginning date or the date of termination of his or her employment for any reason other than death or transfer to the employment of another of the Company’s affiliated companies. Required beginning date is defined in the plan generally to mean the April 1 of the calendar year following the later of the calendar year in which a participant attains the age of 701/2 years or the calendar year in which the participant commences a period of severance, which (with certain exceptions) commences with the date a participant ceases to be employed by the Company or any of its affiliated companies for reasons of retirement, death, being discharged, or voluntarily ceasing employment, or with the first anniversary of the date of his or her absence for any other reason.
           The normal retirement pension accrued under the plan is in the form of 10-year certainan annuity which provides for a payment of a level monthly retirement income to the participant for life, and in the event the participant dies prior to receiving 120 monthly payments, the same monthly amount will continue to be paid to the participant’s designated beneficiary until the total number of monthly payments equals 120. Participants may elect to receive, in lieu of the monthly retirement income, one of the other optional forms of payment provided in the plan, each such option being the actuarial equivalent of the monthly retirement income. These optional forms of payment include a single lump-sum (if the present value of the participant’s vested accrued benefit under the plan does not exceed $10,000), a single life annuity.annuity, and for married participants several forms of joint and survivor elections.
           The monthly retirement income payable pursuant to the plan is equal to:

PensionPlanTable

                  
Five-Year Average Estimated Annual Benefits Upon Retirement at Age 65 
Annual After Completion of the Following Years of Service (2) 
Compensation (1) 15  20  25  30 
$   125,000 $30,000  $40,000  $50,000  $60,000 
   200,000  48,000   64,000   80,000   96,000 
   300,000  72,000   96,000   120,000   144,000 
   400,000  96,000   128,000   160,000   192,000 
   600,000  144,000   192,000   240,000   288,000 
   800,000  192,000   256,000   320,000   384,000 
1,000,000  240,000   320,000   400,000   480,000 
1,400,000  336,000   448,000   560,000   672,000 
1,800,000  432,000   576,000   720,000   864,000 


(1) Benefit amounts underone percent of the Noble Drilling Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan (and related unfunded, nonqualified excess benefit plan) are based on an employee’s vested percentage,participant’s average monthly compensation andmultiplied times the number of years of benefit service (maximum 30 years). The average monthly compensation is defined in the plan generally to mean, plus
six-tenths of one percent of the participant’s average monthly ratecompensation in excess of compensation from the Company for the five successive calendar years that give the highestone-twelfth of his or her average monthly rateamount of compensation for the participant. Plan compensation is defined (with certain exceptions) to mean basic compensation, bonuses, commissions and overtime pay, exclusive of extraordinary compensation but prior to reduction for any compensation deferredearnings which may be considered wages under a cash or deferred arrangement qualifying under Sections 401(k) or 125section 3121(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, in effect for each calendar year during the 35-year period ending with the last day of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, the amountscalendar year in which a participant attains (or will attain) social security retirement age, multiplied by the number of years of benefit service (maximum 30 years).
The average monthly compensation is defined in the plan generally to mean the participant’s average monthly rate of compensation from the Company for the 60 successive calendar months that give the highest average monthly rate of compensation for the participant. In the plan, compensation is defined (with certain exceptions) to mean the total taxable income of a participant during a given calendar month, including basic compensation, bonuses, commissions and overtime pay, but excluding extraordinary payments and special payments (such as moving expenses, benefits provided under any employee benefit program, and stock options and stock appreciation rights). Compensation includes salary reduction contributions by the participant under any plan maintained by the Company or any of its affiliated companies. Compensation may not exceed the annual compensation limit as defined by the Internal Revenue Service for the given plan year. Any compensation in excess of this defined limit will be considered in the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan. The Company has not granted extra years of credited service under the plan to any of the named executive officers.
           Early retirement can be considered at the time after which the participant has attained the age of 55 and has completed at least five years of service or for a participant who was a participant on or before January 1, 1986 and has completed 20 years of covered employment. Robert D. Campbell is the only currently employed named executive officer who currently meets the requirements to be considered for early retirement under the plan. A participant shall be eligible to commence early retirement benefits upon the termination of his or her employment with the Company or its affiliated companies prior to the date that the participant attains the age of 65 for any reason

34


other than death or transfer to employment with another of the Company’s affiliated companies. The formula used in determining an early retirement benefit reduces the accrued monthly retirement income by multiplying the amount of the accrued monthly retirement income times a percentage applicable to the participant’s age as of the date such income commences being paid. For example, if such early retirement benefits were to be paid as of the date of this proxy statement to Mr. Campbell, Mr. Campbell, age 57, would be entitled to 56.7 percent of his accrued monthly retirement income.
           If a participant’s employment terminates for any reason other than retirement, death or transfer to the employment of another of the Company’s affiliated companies and the participant has completed at least five years of service, the participant is eligible for a deferred vested pension. The deferred vested pension for the participant is the monthly retirement income commencing on the first day of the month coinciding with or next following his or her normal retirement date. If the participant has attained the age of 55 and has completed at least five years of service or if the actuarial present value of the participant’s accrued benefit is more than $1,000 but less than $10,000, the participant may elect to receive a monthly retirement income that is computed in the same manner as the monthly retirement income for a participant eligible for an early retirement pension. If the participant dies before benefits are payable under the plan, the surviving spouse or, if the participant is not survived by a spouse, the beneficiary designated by the participant is eligible to receive a monthly retirement income for life, commencing in payment on the first day of the month next following the date of the participant’s death. The monthly income payable to the surviving spouse or the designated beneficiary shall be the monthly income for life that is the actuarial equivalent of the participant’s accrued benefit under the plan.
           The following table sets forth for the named executive officers certain information at December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended with respect to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
                     
  Executive Company Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate
  Contributions in Contributions in Earnings in Withdrawals/ Balance at
Name Last FY ($) (1) Last FY ($) (2) Last FY ($) Distributions ($) Last FYE ($)
David W. Williams $18,521  $1,400  $(831) $0  $16,173 
 
Julie J. Robertson $67,292  $11,375  $178,065  $0  $1,675,629 
 
Thomas L. Mitchell $10,500  $1,400  $83  $0  $9,983 
 
Robert D. Campbell $5,325  $2,000  $25,445  $0  $324,099 
 
William A. Sears (3)               
 
James C. Day $104,400 (4) $6,039  $1,166,908  $5,018,702  $4,735,593 
 
Mark A. Jackson $7,404  $7,404  $56,002  $316,146  $268,056 
(1)The Executive Contributions reported as “Annual Compensation” in this column are also included in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 15 of this proxy statement approximate plan compensation.Table.
 
(2) Retirement benefits shown aboveThe Company contributions reported in this column are calculated using 1.6 percent of final average pay multiplied by years of service. This slightly overstatesalso included in the benefit since that partAll Other Compensation column of the final average pay that is below the Social Security “covered compensation” level should be multiplied by 1.0 percent instead of 1.6 percent. “Covered compensation” is the average of the Social Security Wage Bases during the 35-year period ending with the year the employee reaches Social Security Retirement Age. The amount of benefit shown is not subject to deductions for Social Security.Summary Compensation Table.

     As of December 31, 2004, the named executive officers had the following approximate credited years of service for retirement purposes: Mr. Day — 27; Mr. Jackson — 4; Mr. Adkins — 10; and Ms. Robertson — 16.

17


Equity Compensation Plan Information

     The following table sets forth information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004.

             
          Number of securities 
          remaining available for 
  Number of securities to  Weighted-average  future issuance under 
  be issued upon exercise  exercise price of  equity compensation plans 
  of outstanding options,  outstanding options,  (excluding securities 
Plan Category warrants and rights  warrants and rights  reflected in column (a)) 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  5,816,359  $31.99   4,199,303 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  N/A   N/A   231,121(1)
Total  5,816,359  $31.99   4,430,424 


(1)
(3) Consists of shares issuable underNot a participant in the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan andPlan.
(4)Includes $58,333 of base salary that was deferred in the form of Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Noble Drilling Corporation Equity401(k) Savings Restoration Plan. This amount is also included in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (see the description of this plan below regarding a proposal to amend this plan, which will be considered by members at the annual general meeting).Table.

     Set forth below is a brief description of the material features of the equity compensation plans of the Company that have not been approved by members and for which information is included in the above table.

Noble Drilling Corporation401(k) Savings Restoration Plan.

           The Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan is a nonqualified, unfunded employee benefit plan under which certain highly compensated employees of the Company may elect to defer compensation in excess of amounts deferrable under the Company’sNoble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and, subject to certain limitations specified in the plan, receive employer matching contributions. Effective April 1, 2007, such employer

35


matching contributions (which arewere made in cash. Prior to such date, employer matching contributions were made in Ordinary Shares).Shares. The employer matching amount is limited in the same manner as are employer matching contributions under the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan.
           Compensation considered for deferral in the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan consists of cash remuneration payable by an employer, defined in the plan to mean certain subsidiaries of the Company, to a participant in the plan for personal services rendered to such employer prior to reduction for any pre-tax contributions made by such employer and prior to reduction for any compensation reduction amounts elected by the participant for benefits, but excluding bonuses, allowances, commissions, deferred compensation payments and any other extraordinary remuneration. For each plan year, participants in the nonqualified plan are able to defer pursuant to the terms of the plan up to 19 percent of their basic compensation for the plan year, all or any portion of any bonus otherwise payable by an employer for the plan year, and the applicable 401(k) amount. The applicable 401(k) amount is defined in the plan to mean, with respect to a participant for a plan year, an amount equal to the participant’s basic compensation for such plan year, multiplied by the contribution percentage that is in effect for such participant under the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan for the plan year, reduced by the lesser of (i) the applicable dollar amount set forth in Section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code for such year or (ii) the dollar amount of any Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan contribution limitation for such year imposed by the committee.
           At the discretion of the Company, eligible participants may also receive direct paymentbe credited with amounts of compensation throughcash or Ordinary Shares in their plan accounts as additional awards under thisthe plan. Mr. Day’s salary increases awarded in 2000 and 2001 are currently paid in Ordinary Shares pursuantPursuant to this feature of the plan.plan, Mr. Day deferred $58,333 of his base salary in the year ended December 31, 2007 into the form of Ordinary Shares. The plan limits the total number of Ordinary Shares issuable under the plan to 200,000. No options are issuable under the plan, and there is no “exercise price” applicable to shares delivered under the plan.
           Participants are required to take distribution as soon as practicable following termination of employment but in no event later than 30 days after the last day of the quarter of the plan year during which a participant’s employment with an employer or affiliated company terminates for any reason other than transfer of employment to another employer or affiliated company.
Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control
Change of Control Employment Agreements
           The Company has guaranteed the performance of a change of control employment agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the Company with each person serving as a named executive officer at December 31, 2007 (other than Mr. Sears). These change of control employment agreements become effective upon a change of control of the Company (as described below) or a termination of employment in connection with or in anticipation of such a change of control, and remain effective for three years thereafter.
           The agreement provides that if the officer’s employment is terminated within three years after a change of control or prior to but in anticipation of a change of control, either (1) by us for reasons other than death, disability or “cause” (as defined in the agreement) or (2) by the officer for “good reason” (which term includes a diminution of responsibilities or compensation) or upon the officer’s determination to leave without any reason during the 30-day period immediately following the first anniversary of the change of control, the officer will receive or be entitled to the following benefits:
a lump sum amount equal to the sum of (i) any unpaid portion of the officer’s current salary, (ii) the prorated portion of the officer’s highest bonus paid either in the last three years before the change of control or for the last completed fiscal year after the change of control (the “Highest Bonus”), and (iii) any compensation previously deferred by the officer (together with any accrued interest or earnings thereon) and any accrued vacation pay, in each case to the extent not theretofore paid (collectively, the “Accrued Obligations”);
a lump sum payment equal to three times the sum of the officer’s annual base salary (based on the highest monthly salary paid in the 12 months prior to the change of control) and the officer’s Highest Bonus (the “Severance Amount”);

36


welfare benefits for a three-year period to the officer and the officer’s family at least equal to those that would have been provided had the employment not been terminated. If, however, the executive becomes reemployed with another employer and is eligible to receive welfare benefits under another employer provided plan, the welfare benefits provided by the Company and its affiliates would be secondary to those provided by the new employer (“Welfare Benefit Continuation”);
a lump sum amount equal to the excess of (i) the actuarial equivalent of the benefit under the qualified defined benefit retirement plan of the Company and its affiliated companies in which the officer would have been eligible to participate had the officer’s employment continued for three years after termination over (ii) the actuarial equivalent of the officer’s actual benefit under such plans (the “Supplemental Retirement Amount”);
an additional payment in an amount such that after the payment of all income and excise taxes, the officer will be in the same after-tax position as if no excise tax under Section 4999 (the so-called Parachute Payment excise tax) of the Code, if any, had been imposed (the “Excise Tax Payment”);
outplacement services; and
the 100 percent vesting of all unvested stock options granted or restricted stock awarded under the 1991 Plan and any other similar plan.
           In addition, with respect to options to purchase Ordinary Shares (whether or not such options are exercisable) held by the officer, the officer shall have the right, during the 60-day period after the date of the officer’s termination, to elect to surrender all or part of the options the officer holds in exchange for a cash payment by the Company to the officer in an amount equal to the number of Ordinary Shares subject to the officer’s options multiplied by the excess of (x) over (y), where (x) equals the highest reported sale price of an Ordinary Share in any transaction reported on the New York Stock Exchange during the 60-day period prior to and including the officer’s date of termination and (y) equals the purchase price per share covered by the option.
           A “change of control” is defined in the agreement to mean:
the acquisition by any individual, entity or group of 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding Ordinary Shares, but excluding any acquisition directly from the Company or by the Company, or any acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a reorganization, merger, amalgamation or consolidation if the conditions described below in the third bullet point of this definition are satisfied;
individuals who constitute the incumbent board of directors (as defined the agreement) of the Company cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors;
consummation of a reorganization, merger, amalgamation or consolidation of the Company, unless following such a reorganization, merger, amalgamation or consolidation (i) more than 50 percent of the then outstanding shares of common stock (or equivalent security) of the company resulting from such transaction and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors are then beneficially owned by all or substantially all of the persons who were the beneficial owners of the outstanding Ordinary Shares immediately prior to such transaction, (ii) no person, other than the Company or any person beneficially owning immediately prior to such transaction 15 percent or more of the outstanding Ordinary Shares, beneficially owns 15 percent or more of the then outstanding shares of common stock (or equivalent security) of the company resulting from such transaction or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, and (iii) a majority of the members of the board of directors of the company resulting from such transaction were members of the incumbent board of directors of the Company at the time of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such transaction;
consummation of a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, other than to a company, with respect to which following such sale or other disposition, (i) more than 50 percent of the then outstanding shares of common stock (or equivalent security) of such company and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such company entitled to vote generally in the

37


election of directors are then beneficially owned by all or substantially all of the persons who were the beneficial owners of the outstanding Ordinary Shares immediately prior to such sale or other disposition of assets, (ii) no person, other than the Company or any person beneficially owning immediately prior to such transaction 15 percent or more of the outstanding Ordinary Shares, beneficially owns 15 percent or more of the then outstanding shares of common stock (or equivalent security) of such company or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, and (iii) a majority of the members of the board of directors of such company were members of the incumbent board of directors of the Company at the time of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such sale or other disposition of assets; or
approval by the members of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
           Under the agreement, “cause” means (i) the willful and continued failure by the officer to substantially perform his duties or (ii) the willful engaging by the officer in illegal conduct or gross misconduct that is materially detrimental to the Company or its affiliates.
           The agreement contains a provision on confidentiality obligating the officer to hold in strict confidence and not to disclose or reveal, directly or indirectly, to any person, or use for the officer’s own personal benefit or for the benefit of any one else, any trade secrets, confidential dealings or other confidential or proprietary information belonging to or concerning the Company or any of its affiliated companies, with certain exceptions set forth expressly in the provision. Any term or condition of the agreement may be waived at any time by the party entitled to have the benefit thereof (whether the subsidiary of the Company party to the agreement or the officer) if evidenced by a writing signed by such party.
           The agreement provides that payments thereunder do not reduce any amounts otherwise payable to the officer, or in any way diminish the officer’s rights as an employee, under any employee benefit plan, program or arrangement or other contract or agreement of the Company or any of its affiliated companies providing benefits to the officer.
           Assuming a change of control had taken place on December 31, 2007 and the employment of the named executive officer was terminated either (1) by us for reasons other than death, disability or cause or (2) by the officer for good reason, the following table sets forth the estimated amounts of payments and benefits under the agreement for each of the indicated named executive officers.
                 
  David W. Julie J. Thomas L. Robert D.
Payment or Benefit Williams Robertson Mitchell Campbell
Accrued Obligations $150,000  $560,000  $100,000  $300,000 
Severance Amount $1,950,012  $2,955,012  $1,499,988  $1,845,000 
Welfare Benefit Continuation $80,359  $60,085  $75,916  $55,639 
Supplemental Retirement Amount $0  $970,853  $0  $241,889 
Excise Tax Payment $3,549,684  $4,752,304  $2,515,590  $0 
Outplacement Services (1) $30,000  $25,000  $30,000  $25,000 
Accelerated Vesting of Options and Restricted Shares (2) (3) $11,612,967  $9,279,045  $8,253,737  $3,991,043 
(1)Represents an estimate of the costs to the Company of outplacement services for one year.
(2)The total number of Restricted Shares held at December 31, 2007, and the aggregate value of accelerated vesting thereof at December 31, 2007 (computed by multiplying $56.51, the closing market price of the Ordinary Shares at December 31, 2007, times the total number of Restricted Shares held), were as follows: Mr. Williams – 165,935 shares valued at $9,376,987; Ms. Robertson – 144,576 shares valued at $8,169,990; Mr. Mitchell – 119,512 shares valued at $6,753,623; and Mr. Campbell – 62,316 shares valued at $3,521,477.

38


(3)The total number of unvested options held at December 31, 2007, and the aggregate value of the accelerated vesting thereof at December 31, 2007 (computed by multiplying $56.51, the closing market price of Ordinary Shares at December 31, 2007, times the total number of Ordinary Shares subject to the options and subtracting the aggregate exercise price for the options) were as follows: Mr. Williams – 94,127 shares valued at $2,235,980; Ms. Robertson – 50,054 shares valued at $1,109,055; Mr. Mitchell – 71,640 shares valued at $1,500,114; and Mr. Campbell – 20,302 shares valued at $469,566.
           The agreement provides that if the officer’s employment is terminated within three years after a change of control by reason of disability or death, the agreement will terminate without further obligation to the officer or the officer’s estate, other than for the payment of Accrued Obligations, the Severance Amount, the Supplemental Retirement Amount and the timely payment or provision of the Welfare Benefit Continuation. If the officer’s employment is terminated for cause within the three years after a change of control, the agreement will terminate without further obligation to the officer other than for payment of the officer’s base salary through the date of termination plus the amount of any compensation previously deferred by the officer, in each case to the extent unpaid. If the officer voluntarily terminates the officer’s employment within the three years after a change of control, excluding a termination for good reason, the agreement will terminate without further obligation to the officer other than for the payment of the Accrued Obligations.
The 1991 Plan
           We have granted nonqualified stock options and awarded time-vested Restricted Shares and performance-vested Restricted Shares under the 1991 Plan.
     Noble Corporation Equity CompensationNonqualified Stock Options
           Our nonqualfied stock option agreements provide that if a termination of employment occurs after the date upon which the option first becomes exercisable and before the date that is 10 years from the date of the option grant by reason of the officer’s death, disability or retirement, then the option, including any then unvested Ordinary Shares all of which shall be automatically accelerated, may be exercised at any time within five years after such termination of employment but not after the expiration of the 10-year period. If a named executive officer terminated employment on December 31, 2007 due to disability, death or retirement, all the named executive officer’s then outstanding nonqualified stock options granted by us in 2006 and 2005 would have become fully exercisable. Under the plan, retirement means a termination of employment with the Company or an affiliate of the Company on a voluntary basis by a person if immediately prior to such termination of employment, the sum of the age of such person and the number of such person’s years of continuous service with the Company or one or more of its affiliates is equal to or greater than 60.
           Assuming that the named executive officer’s employment terminated on December 31, 2007 due to disability, death or retirement, the following table sets forth certain information with respect to unexercisable options subject to accelerated vesting for the indicated named executive officers.
         
  Number of Ordinary Shares  
  Underlying Unexercisable  
  Options Subject to Aggregate Value of
Name Acceleration of Vesting Acceleration of Vesting
David W. Williams  66,667  $1,667,008 
Julie J. Robertson  27,170  $634,899 
Thomas L. Mitchell  53,334  $1,120,814 
Robert D. Campbell  10,386  $264,107 
William A. Sears  0  $0 
Restricted Shares
           Our time-vested Restricted Share agreements provide for the full vesting of Restricted Share awards upon the occurrence of the death or disability of the officer or a change in control of the Company (whether with or

39


without termination of employment of the officer by the Company or an affiliate). A “change of control” is defined in these agreements and the performance-vested Restricted Share agreements described below to mean:
the committee administrating the plan determines that any person or group has become the beneficial owner of more than 50 percent of the Ordinary Shares;
the Company is merged or amalgamated with or into or consolidated with another corporation and, immediately after giving effect to the merger, amalgamation or consolidation, less than 50 percent of the outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors or persons who serve similar functions of the surviving or resulting entity are then beneficially owned in the aggregate by the members of the Company immediately prior to such merger, amalgamation or consolidation, or if a record date has been set to determine the members of the Company entitled to vote on such merger, amalgamation or consolidation, the members of the Company as of such record date;
the Company either individually or in conjunction with one or more subsidiaries of the Company, sells, conveys, transfers or leases, or the subsidiaries of the Company sell, convey, transfer or lease, all or substantially all of the property of the Company and the subsidiaries of the Company, taken as a whole (either in one transaction or a series of related transactions);
the Company liquidates or dissolves; or
the first day on which a majority of the individuals who constitute the board of directors of the Company are not continuing directors (within the meaning of the plan).
           Assuming that either a change of control took place on December 31, 2007 or the named executive officer’s employment terminated on that date due to disability or death, the following table sets forth certain information with respect to Restricted Shares subject to accelerated vesting for the indicated named executive officers.
         
  Number of Time-Vested  
  Restricted Shares Subject to Aggregate Value of
Name Acceleration of Vesting Acceleration of Vesting
David W. Williams  86,785  $4,904,220 
Julie J. Robertson  30,236  $1,708,636 
Thomas L. Mitchell  66,746  $3,771,816 
Robert D. Campbell  12,640  $714,286 
William A. Sears  23,081  $1,304,307 
           Our performance-vested Restricted Share agreements provide for the vesting of 66.7 percent of the Restricted Share awards upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company (whether with or without termination of employment of the officer by the Company or an affiliate). Assuming that a change of control took place on December 31, 2007, the following table sets forth certain information with respect to Restricted Shares subject to accelerated vesting for the indicated named executive officers.
         
  Number of Performance-Vested  
  Restricted Shares Subject to Aggregate Value of
Name Acceleration of Vesting Acceleration of Vesting
David W. Williams  52,793  $2,983,335 
Julie J. Robertson  76,265  $4,309,723 
Thomas L. Mitchell  35,195  $1,988,865 
Robert D. Campbell  33,134  $1,872,396 
William A. Sears  0  $0 

40


Transition Consulting Services Agreement
           The Company and James C. Day entered into a Transition Consulting Services Agreement dated as of April 26, 2007 (the “Transition Agreement”). Under the terms of the Transition Agreement, Mr. Day agreed to provide consulting services to the Company and its affiliated entities from May 1, 2007 through April 30, 2009 (the “Completion Date”). These consulting services may include matters relating to: transition of the duties and responsibilities of Mr. Day as a former Chief Executive Officer of the Company to successor Chief Executive Officers; strategic acquisitions, dispositions, capital raising activities and major financings; compensation matters; and business strategy planning. The Transition Agreement provides for Mr. Day to receive a monthly fee of $20,834 and to be reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him in the course of his duties under the Transition Agreement. The Company will indemnify and advance expenses to Mr. Day for matters in which he is named or threatened to be named a party, to the extent arising out of his services under the Transition Agreement or status as a consultant to the Company, on the same terms that the Company indemnifies and advances expenses to its directors.
           Under the terms of the Transition Agreement, Mr. Day released the Company and its affiliates from all claims relating to his employment with the Company or the termination of such employment and agreed that he will not, from May 1, 2007 through the one-year anniversary of the Completion Date, compete with the Company or solicit the Company’s customers or employees. The Transition Agreement also contains covenants of Mr. Day regarding confidentiality of certain information and non-disparagement. The Transition Agreement does not terminate, modify or supersede any benefit to which Mr. Day, as a retired executive of the Company, otherwise is entitled to receive.
           The compensation committee exercised its discretion pursuant to the terms of the 1991 Plan to accelerate, effective with Mr. Day’s retirement, the vesting of 39,186 time-vested Restricted Shares of the Company held by Mr. Day that had not vested on or before April 30, 2007, which was the effective date of Mr. Day’s retirement. At the time of Mr. Day’s retirement, our Board approved a charitable gift of $1.5 million to the capital campaign of the University of Oklahoma College of Earth and Energy in recognition of Mr. Day’s service to the Company. The Company paid the full amount of this chartable gift in 2007.
Separation Agreement and Release
           On September 20, 2007, the Company and Mark A. Jackson, then Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, mutually determined to terminate their employment relationship effective immediately. In connection with this termination, the Company and Mr. Jackson entered into a Separation Agreement and Release dated as of September 20, 2007 (the “Separation Agreement”). Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Jackson’s employment and all positions held by Mr. Jackson with the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates were terminated effective September 20, 2007 (the “Separation Date”). Pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement, the Company paid to Mr. Jackson an amount of cash for Non-Employee Directorsall salary earned but unpaid through the Separation Date and for all accrued but unused vacation as of the Separation Date. In addition, the Company paid a separation payment to Mr. Jackson equal to one year of his base salary in effect as of the Separation Date ($750,000), plus an amount equal to the bonus amount Mr. Jackson could have earned (on a pro rated basis through the Separation Date) under the STIP for the 2007 plan year ($562,500). For
           Pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement, (i) 97,144 shares subject to nonqualified stock options granted to Mr. Jackson under the 1991 Plan became immediately vested and exercisable in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreements granting those options, and (ii) 61,388 time-vested Restricted Shares awarded to Mr. Jackson under the 1991 Plan became immediately vested.
           Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Jackson released the Company and its affiliates from all claims relating to his employment with the Company or the termination of such employment and agreed that he will not, for a one year period following the Separation Date, solicit the Company’s employees. The Separation Agreement also contains covenants of Mr. Jackson regarding confidentiality of certain information and non-disparagement.
           Any vested interest held by Mr. Jackson in any retirement plan or other plan in which Mr. Jackson participated will be distributed to him in accordance with the terms of those plans and applicable law. The Separation Agreement does not terminate any right Mr. Jackson may have to indemnification under the Company’s organizational documents, applicable law or the Company’s director and officer liability insurance policy as in

41


effect from time to time. Other than what is expressly provided for in the Separation Agreement, Mr. Jackson is not entitled to any other compensation, payments or benefits from the Company or its subsidiaries.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
           The compensation committee of our Board sets the compensation of our directors. In determining the appropriate level of compensation for our directors, the compensation committee considers the commitment required from our directors in performing their duties on behalf of the Company, as well as comparative information the committee obtains from compensation consulting firms and from other sources. Set forth below is a description of this plan and a descriptionthe compensation of our Board’s proposal to amend this plan, which will be considered by members at the annual general meeting, see “Additional Information Regarding the Board of Directors – Compensation of Directors – directors.
Annual Retainers and Other Fees and Expenses” and “ProposalExpenses.
           We pay our non-employee directors an annual retainer of $50,000 of which 20 percent is paid in Ordinary Shares pursuant to Amend the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors” beginningDirectors. Under this plan, non-employee directors may elect to receive up to all the balance in Ordinary Shares or cash. Non-employee directors make elections on page 26a quarterly basis. The number of this proxy statement.Ordinary Shares to be issued under the plan in any particular quarter is generally determined using the average of the daily closing prices of the Ordinary Shares for the last 15 consecutive trading days of the previous quarter. No options are issuable under the plan, and there is no “exercise price” applicable to shares delivered under the plan.

18


Performance Graph

           In addition, we pay our non-employee directors a Board meeting fee of $2,000. We pay each member of our audit committee a committee fee of $2,500 per meeting and each member of our other committees a committee meeting fee of $2,000 per meeting. The following graph sets forth the cumulative total member (shareholder) return for the Ordinary Shareschair of the Company,audit committee receives an annual retainer of $15,000, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index,chair of the compensation committee receives an annual retainer of $12,500 and the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Indexchair of each other standing Board committee receives an annual retainer of $10,000. We also reimburse directors for travel, lodging and related expenses they may incur in attending Board and committee meetings.

Non-Employee Director Stock Options and Restricted Shares.
           In 2007, the years indicated as prescribed by the SEC’s rules. You can obtain additional information regardingcompensation committee commissioned Hewitt to conduct a competitive market analysis of non-employee director compensation. Hewitt’s report included analysis on current market practices in non-employee director compensation amongst the companies in the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index by visiting the websitewww.djindexes.com, selecting “Benchmark Indexes – Total Market,” then selecting “Exch. Products” under the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index, then selecting “Component Weightings.”

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Returns
among Noble Corporation, S&P 500 IndexDirect and
Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index

(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)

Note: The index level for all indexes was set to $100 on December 31, 1999.

19


Supplemental Performance Graph

     The Company has elected to include in this proxy statement the following supplemental performance graph, which compares the cumulative total member (shareholder) return for the Ordinary Shares Broad Energy Peer Groups and the two indexes in the above graph over the period indicated below.

Comparison of Nineteen-Year Cumulative Total Returns
among Noble Corporation, S&P 500 Index and
Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index

(SUPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE GRAPH)

Note: The index level for all indexes was set to $100 on December 31, 1985. The Company became a publicly held corporation in October 1985.

20


PROPOSAL TO AMEND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
TO INCREASE DIRECTOR RETIREMENT AGE

Background and Reasons

     Our articles of association provide a mandatory retirement age for directors. Priormade recommendations to the internal corporate restructuring in 2002 in which the Company became the successorcompensation committee. In order to Noble Drilling Corporation, the bylaws of Noble Drilling Corporation contained an identical provision regarding the retirement age of directors. Generally article 54 of the Company’s articles of association currently provides that an individual is eligible to be elected a director until the first annual general meeting of members after such individual becomes 70 years of age. A director duly elected is permitted to serve out the term to which he or she was elected notwithstanding that such director may have become age 70 during the term.

     As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted byprovide our Board and posted on the Company’s website, our Board does not believe that arbitrary term limits on directors’ service are appropriate or that directors should expectwith flexibility annually to be re-nominated at the end of each term until they reach the mandatory retirement age. The Corporate Governance Guidelines further state that directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, character, integrity and values and that they must also possess an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The Company endeavorsalign non-employee director compensation more closely with compensation paid to have a board representing diverse experience in policy-making positions in areas that are relevant to Noble’s lines of business and areas of operations worldwide.

     At its meeting in January 2004, the nominating and corporate governance committee of our Board reviewed the terms of article 54 and the procedure under the laws of the Cayman Islands to amend such provision. In addition, such committee reviewed and considered the effect of the retirement age provision on the then currentnon-employee directors of the Company, including William A. Sears. Director Sears, whose term will expire at the 2005 annual general meetingone or more comparator groups of members, became age 70 on April 8, 2004.

     At its meeting in February 2005, the nominating and corporate governance committee of our Board approved the nomination of Mr. Sears on the following terms and conditions. The re-election of Mr. Sears as a director of the Company at the annual general meeting to serve a three-year term expiring in 2008 is conditional upon member adoption of the special resolution to increase the director retirement age described below. The number of directors constituting our Board will be reduced to seven from eight, and the number of directors in the class whose term expires in 2008 will be reduced to two from three, if members do not duly adopt the proposed special resolution.

Proposed Amendment of Articles of Association

     Our Board has approved, and proposes and recommends to members that they adopt, the following special resolution to increase the director retirement age:

          RESOLVED, that the Articles of Association of Noble Corporation are amended by deleting article 54 in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:

“54Each Director shall be at least 21 years of age. A person shall be eligible to be elected a Director of the Company until the annual general meeting of the Company next succeeding such person’s 72nd birthday, and any person serving as a Director on such Director’s 72nd birthday shall be eligible to complete such Director’s term as such. Directors need not be Members of the Company.”

Recommendation and Required Affirmative Vote

     The affirmative vote of the holders of not less than a two-thirds majority of our Ordinary Shares entitled to vote and who do vote (in person or by proxy) at the meeting is required to approve the special resolution. Our Board has unanimously approved the proposed amendment and believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and our members.Accordingly, our Board recommends that you vote FOR adoption of the special resolution.

21


PROPOSAL REGARDING THE
NOBLE CORPORATION 1992 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

General

     The Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors was approved by members (prior to April 30, 2002, stockholders of Noble Drilling Corporation) in 1993, and was amended with member approval in both 2000 and 2002 (as amended, the “1992 Plan”). In February 2005,companies, our Board amended and restated the 1992 Plan subject to member approval,in October 2007 to:

 increase by 325,000eliminate the aggregate numberannual grant to non-employee directors of an option to purchase 4,000 Ordinary Shares available for issuance under the 1992 Plan;Shares;
 
 reduceeliminate the size of automatic annual grants of optionsone-time grant to be made tonew non-employee directors under the planof an option to 2,000purchase 20,000 Ordinary Shares per director;Shares; and
 
 provide for an automaticmodify the annual award of 4,000 restricted8,000 Restricted Shares from a fixed number of Restricted Shares to an annually-determined variable number of Restricted Shares or unrestricted Ordinary Shares not to exceed an aggregate of 8,000 shares to eachper non-employee director, which shares would vest one-third per year over three years, commencing on the first anniversary of the award (collectively, the “1992 Plan Amendments”).director.

     The

Pursuant to the terms of the amended 1992 Plan, would continue to provide for the initial granteach annually-determined award of an option to purchase 10,000a variable number of Restricted Shares or unrestricted Ordinary Shares to each new non-employee director upon hisis made on a date selected by the Board, or her election to our Board.

     The purposeif no such date is selected by the Board, the date on which the Board action approving such award is taken. Any future award of the 1992 Plan is to promote the interests of the CompanyRestricted Shares will be evidenced by a written agreement that will include such terms and our members by attracting, retaining and stimulating the performance of qualified non-employee directors.

Proposal Regarding the 1992 Plan

1992 Plan Amendments. Prior to the 1992 Plan Amendments, the 1992 Plan didconditions not provide for awards to be made under the plan other than grants of stock options covering Ordinary Shares. As of January 31, 2005, there were outstanding options granted under the 1992 Plan covering 269,000 Ordinary Shares and 289,500 Ordinary Shares remained available for future grants under the 1992 Plan. The 1992 Plan Amendments would result in an additional 325,000 Ordinary Shares being available for future grants of stock options and awards of restricted shares under the plan. We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as practicable following member approval of the proposal to amend the 1992 Plan in accordanceinconsistent with the 1992 Plan Amendments to register the additional 325,000 Ordinary Shares that would become available for future grantsterms and awards under the plan.

     In February 2005, our Board determined, based in part on market analysis performed by an independent compensation consulting firm, that the 1992 Plan Amendments described above were appropriate in order to continue to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as non-employee directors of the Company. As a result our Board is proposing the 1992 Plan Amendments to our members at the annual general meeting. A copyconditions of the 1992 Plan as amended and restated, subject to member approval, is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C.

     If the proposal regardingBoard considers appropriate in each case.

           On October 25, 2007, an award of 6,060 unrestricted Ordinary Shares under the amended 1992 Plan is approvedwas made to each non-employee director serving on that date. Based on a review of market data provided by members, pursuantHewitt, the market value of this award approximated the 75th percentile of the compensation paid to the 1992 Plan Amendments our non-employee directors would receive (i) automatic annual grants of options covering 2,000 Ordinary Shares per director, rather than 7,500 Ordinary Shares as is provided for currently in the 1992 Plan, and (ii) an automatic annual award of 4,000 restricted shares per director, which shares would vest one-third per year over three years, commencing on the first anniversarycomparator groups. The grant date fair value computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R of the award. The 1992 Plan, as amended and restated, would continue to provide that upon first election to our Board, such new non-employee director would receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 10,0006,060 unrestricted Ordinary Shares (insteadShare award was $321,907, which value was immediately recognized by the Company at the time of the annual 2,000 Ordinary Share option and 4,000 restricted share award). The proposed changes to the 1992 Plan would be effective for grants and awards beginning with annual grants and awards to be made following the 2005 annual general meeting of members. Pursuant to the 1992 Plan Amendments, our non-employee directors who are eligible to participateaward (see footnote 4 in the 1992 Plantable below). By way of comparison, the grant date fair value computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R of the 8,000 Restricted Shares that would receive

have been awarded to

2242


additional benefits under

non-employee directors if the 1992 Plan ashad not been amended would have been $424,960 (calculated using a resultgrant date fair value per share of this change. This amendment$53.12 on October 25, 2007), which value would not applyhave been generally recognized on a straight line basis over the three-year vesting period of the award.
           The 1992 Plan was approved by members in April 2005. Once an equity compensation plan has been approved by members, the NYSE rules provide that material revisions to any prior grants of options underequity compensation plans require member approval. Prior to making the October 2007 amendments to the 1992 Plan.

Description ofPlan, the Company sought and obtained from the NYSE confirmation that the October 2007 amendments were not considered by the NYSE to be material revisions to the 1992 Plan

     The material features that would require member approval.

           Under the terms of the 1992 Plan givingin effect tobefore the 1992 Plan Amendments, are as described below.

General. The 1992 Plan provides for automatic equityOctober 2007 amendments, non-employee directors received the grants and awards to directors who are not employees ofdescribed below in this and the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliated entities. Only non-employee directors are entitled to participate in the 1992 Plan. No executive officer of the Company who is an employee, or any other employee, is entitled to participate in the 1992 Plan.

     Each non-employee director receives a one-time grant of an option to purchase 10,000 Ordinary Shares upon the first grant date after the director’s election or appointment to our Board. Thereafter, onnext paragraph. On the next business day after each annual general meeting of our members each such director automatically receives (i) aof the Company, the Company made an annual grant of an option to purchase 2,0004,000 Ordinary Shares and (ii) an annual award of 4,000 restricted shares.8,000 Restricted Shares. The options arewere granted at fair market value on the grant date, which was generally determined using the average of the daily closing prices of the Ordinary Shares for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date of grant, and are exercisable from time to time over a period generally commencing one year from the grant date and ending on the expiration of 10 years from the grant date, unless terminated sooner as described in the 1992 Plan.plan. The restricted shares are subjectRestricted Shares were awarded to restrictions until vested, and will vest one-third per year over three years commencing on the first anniversary ofone year from the award date, unless the restrictions are terminated sooner as described in the 1992 Plan.

     The maximum number of Ordinary Shares issuable under the 1992 Plan is 975,000, subject to the adjustment provisions of the plan, of which 614,500 are available for future grants and awards under the plan. In the event ofdate. If a dividend payable in Ordinary Shares, split of the Ordinary Shares, Ordinary Share combination, reclassification of the Ordinary Shares, merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation, reorganization or the like, appropriate adjustments will be made in the maximum number of Ordinary Shares subject to the 1992 Plan, the number of restricted shares outstanding and the number of shares and option prices under then outstanding options.

     The following table sets forth (i) the number of Ordinary Shares subject to options granted under the 1992 Plan for each of our current non-employee directors, (ii) the number of Ordinary Shares with respect to which options granted under the 1992 Plan have been exercised as of January 31, 2005, (iii) the number of restricted shares that each non-employee director will receive annually if members approve the 1992 Plan Amendments and (iv) the number of Ordinary Shares subject to options that each non-employee director will receive annually if members approve the 1992 Plan Amendments. In all cases regarding options, the exercise prices were equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of an Ordinary Share on the date of grant of the option:

1992 Plan

                 
          Number of  Number of Shares 
          Restricted Shares  Subject to Options 
  Number of Shares      to be Awarded  to be Granted 
Non-Employee Subject to Past  Shares Acquired  Annually, Subject  Annually, Subject 
Directors Option Grants  Upon Exercise  to Member Approval  to Member Approval 
Michael A. Cawley  62,000   17,000   4,000   2,000 
Lawrence J. Chazen  55,000   24,000   4,000   2,000 
Luke R. Corbett  25,000   0   4,000   2,000 
Marc E. Leland  55,000   0   4,000   2,000 
Jack E. Little  37,500   0   4,000   2,000 
Mary P. Ricciardello  10,000   0   4,000   2,000 
William A. Sears  44,500   0   4,000   2,000 

     The exercise prices for the options issued in the past under the 1992 Plan range from $6.76 to $47.69 per share. The closing price of our Ordinary Shares on the NYSE on March 15, 2005 was $55.21 per share.

Administration. The 1992 Plan is administered by our Board.

23


Types of Options. Options granted under the 1992 Plan will continue to be options which do not meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), and are, therefore, known as “nonqualified stock options.”

Option Exercise Price. The option exercise price is 100 percent of “Fair Market Value” per Ordinary Share on the date of grant. Under the 1992 Plan, the Fair Market Value is generally defined to mean the average of the closing sales prices of the Ordinary Shares for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date of grant.

Payment of Exercise Price. Payment for Ordinary Shares purchased upon the exercise of an option may be made by cash, check or appropriate exercise through an optionee’s brokerage firm, at the time of exercise.

Restricted Shares. A restricted share is an Ordinary Share that may not be sold, assigned, transferred, discounted, exchanged, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until the restrictions set by our Board have been satisfied (the “Restricted Period”). During the Restricted Period, unless specifically provided in the 1992 Plan, the recipient of restricted shares would be the record owner of such shares and have all the rights of a member with respect to such shares, including the right to vote and the right to receive dividends or other distributions made or paid with respect to such shares. The 1992 Plan provides that our Board has the authority to cancel all or any portion of any outstanding restrictions prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period. If during the Restricted Period a director to whom restricted shares has been awarded ceases to beserve as a director for any reason, any restricted shares remaining subject to restrictionsunvested Restricted Shares generally will be forfeited by such director; provided, however, if the director and transferred at no costcessation is due to the Company.

Term, Amendment and Termination of the 1992 Plan. To the extent permitted by law,such director’s death, retirement or disability, our Board may, amend, modify, suspendin its sole and absolute discretion, deem that the terms and conditions have been met for such director to retain all or terminate the 1992 Plan. However, underpart of such unvested Restricted Shares.

            Under the terms of the 1992 Plan member approval is requiredin effect before any amendment can become effective which would (i) increase the maximum numberOctober 2007 amendments, each new non-employee director received a one-time grant of an option to purchase 20,000 Ordinary Shares issuable underon the 1992 Plan other than pursuantfirst grant date after such director began serving on our Board (instead of the annual grant of an option to purchase 4,000 Ordinary Shares and award of 8,000 Restricted Shares that would have otherwise been applicable). This one-time option was granted on the adjustment provisions, (ii) change the class of persons eligible to receive options, (iii) materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the 1992 Plan, or (iv) have the effect of providingsame terms and conditions as are described above for the 4,000 share annual option grant. The annual grant of optionsan option to purchase 4,000 Ordinary Shares at less than fair market value. In addition,and the rulesannual award of 8,000 Restricted Shares were not made for the year ended December 31, 2007.
           The following table shows the compensation of the New York Stock Exchange require that certain amendments to the 1992 Plan must be approved by our members. Subject to earlier termination, the 1992 Plan will remain in effect until the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan have been issued.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

     The following summary is based on an analysis of the Code, existing laws, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, regulations and proposed regulations, all of which are subject to change. Moreover, the following is only a summary of U.S. federal income tax consequences and such consequences may be either more or less favorable than those described below depending on a director’s particular circumstances.

     For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the grant of a nonqualified stock option with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the time of such grant should not result in recognition of income by the optionee. Upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option by an employee who is not then an officer or director, the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date over the option price will be considered as compensation taxable as ordinary income. If, however, at the time of exercise of the option, the optionee remains a director or is an “officer” as defined in Rule 16a-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and if the sale of the stock at a profit within six months could subject such person to suit under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the fair market value of the stock is determined, and the tax applicable thereto is incurred, at the end of such six-month period or at such earlier time as may be determined by the occurrence of an event which causes Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to become inapplicable to such person. In the event of a gain or loss realized upon the sale of the shares received upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the optionee will recognize long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the optionee’s holding periodCompany’s directors for the shares.

year ended December 31, 2007.
Director Compensation for 2007
                             
                  Change in    
                  Pension Value    
  Fees         Non-Equity and    
  Earned         Incentive Nonqualified    
  or Paid in Stock Option Plan Deferred All Other  
  Cash Awards ($) Awards ($) Compen- Compensation Compen-  
Name (1)(2) ($)(3) (4) (5) sation ($) Earnings ($) sation ($) Total ($) (6)
Michael A. Cawley $104,000  $496,381  $18,290        $1,067  $619,738 
Lawrence J. Chazen $134,000  $496,381  $18,290        $1,067  $649,738 
Luke R. Corbett $96,000  $496,381  $18,290        $1,067  $611,738 
Julie H. Edwards $125,500  $321,907  $91,452        $0  $538,859 
Marc E. Leland $100,000  $496,381  $18,290        $1,067  $615,738 
Jack E. Little $150,500  $496,381  $18,290        $1,067  $666,238 
Mary P. Ricciardello $153,000  $496,381  $18,290        $1,067  $668,738 
William A. Sears $102,500  $174,474  $18,290        $1,067  $296,331 
(1)The compensation paid to James C. Day and Mark A. Jackson for their services performed as directors of the Company during 2007 is fully reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. The compensation paid to Mr. Sears for services performed as a director of the Company prior to September 20, 2007, the effective date of his appointment on an interim basis as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, is fully reflected in this Director Compensation table. No compensation was paid to Mr. Sears for services performed as a director of the Company during 2007 after the date of his appointment to such offices.

     Nonqualified stock options, such as the options that may be granted under the 1992 Plan, typically provide the issuer with a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the optionee at the time of such recognition by the optionee, subject to limitations on deductions set forth in the Code (e.g.,Section 162(m)). However, since the Company is a Cayman Islands company, the amounts that would otherwise be deductible by the

2443


(2)The total number of Restricted Shares and options to purchase Ordinary Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2007 under the 1992 Plan were as follows: Mr. Cawley – 8,002 shares and 84,000 options; Mr. Chazen – 8,002 shares and 48,000 options; Mr. Corbett – 8,002 shares and 58,000 options; Ms. Edwards – 0 shares and 20,000 options; Mr. Leland – 8,002 shares and 77,000 options; Mr. Little – 8,002 shares and 83,000 options; Ms. Ricciardello – 8,002 shares and 28,000 options; and Mr. Sears– 8,002 shares and 97,000 options.
(3)Includes the portion of the $50,000 annual retainer paid to our directors in Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
(4)Represents the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the year ended December 31, 2007 in accordance with SFAS No. 123R for unrestricted Ordinary Shares awarded in 2007 and Restricted Shares awarded in 2006 and 2005. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, the grant date fair value of stock-based compensation is recognized as expense over the service period, which generally represents the vesting period. For the unrestricted Ordinary Shares awarded in 2007 to each director listed in the Director Compensation Table (other than Mr. Sears), the full SFAS No. 123R grant date fair value of $321,907 was recognized in 2007 on the date the award of unrestricted Ordinary Shares was made. Restricted Shares with a three-year vesting period were awarded in 2006 and 2005 to each director listed in the Director Compensation Table except for Ms. Edwards, who as a new non-employee director in 2006 then received the one-time grant of an option to purchase 20,000 Ordinary Shares. For the Restricted Shares awarded in 2006 and 2005, the dollar amount recognized in 2007 in accordance with SFAS No. 123R was $174,474. A description of the assumptions made in our valuation of stock and option awards is set forth in Note 6 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Form 10-K.
(5)Represents the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the year ended December 31, 2007 in accordance with SFAS No. 123R for options granted in 2006 that vested in 2007. No options were granted in 2007. A description of the assumptions made in our valuation of stock and option awards is set forth in Note 6 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Form 10-K.
(6)The compensation reflected in the Total column includes certain dollar amounts for Restricted Shares awarded in 2006 and 2005 and for options granted in 2006 that vested in 2007, as reported in accordance with the applicable rules of the SEC. See footnotes 4 and 5 above. As described under “Non-Employee Director Stock Options and Restricted Shares” preceding this table, the Board effected the October 2007 amendments to the 1992 Plan to provide flexibility annually to align non-employee director compensation more closely with compensation paid to non-employee directors of one or more comparator groups of companies. The compensation in the Total column, adjusted to deduct amounts attributable to pre-2007 compensation actions as referenced in the first sentence of this footnote, would be:
     
Name Total 
 
Cawley $426,974 
Chazen $456,974 
Corbett $418,974 
Edwards $447,407 
Leland $422,974 
Little $473,474 
Ricciardello $475,974 
Sears $103,567 

Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes would be deductible only to the extent that the Company has United States source income from which to deduct such amounts.

     The basis of shares transferred to an optionee upon the exercise of an option granted under the 1992 Plan is the price paid for such shares plus an amount equal to any income recognized by the optionee as a result of the exercise of the option. If an optionee thereafter sells shares acquired upon exercise of an option granted under the 1992 Plan, any amount realized over the basis of the shares will constitute capital gain to the optionee for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Additional special rules apply if an optionee uses already owned Ordinary Shares to pay the exercise price for shares under an option granted under the 1992 Plan.

     If the restrictions on an award of restricted shares are of a nature that such shares are both subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and are not freely transferable within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code, the recipient will not recognize income for U.S. federal income tax purposes at the time of the award. The recipient may, however, affirmatively elect within 30 days after the date the restricted shares are received to include the fair market value of the restricted shares on the date of the award, less any amount paid therefor, in gross income for the year of the award pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code. In the absence of such an election, the recipient will be required to include in income for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the year in which the shares either become freely transferable or are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code, the fair market value of the restricted shares on such date, less any amount paid therefor.

     An issuer of restricted shares is generally entitled to a deduction at the time of income recognition to the recipient in an amount equal to the amount the recipient is required to include in income with respect to the shares, subject to the limitations on deductibility set forth in the Code (e.g.,Section 162(m)). If a Section 83(b) election is made and the restricted shares are subsequently forfeited, no deduction would be allowed to the recipient with respect to such forfeiture. As described above, as a Cayman Islands company, the Company will be entitled to any such deduction only to the extent that the Company has United States source income.

     Under certain circumstances, Section 162(m) of the Code may limit the extent to which amounts are deductible by the employer/company. Section 162(m) generally limits the deduction for certain types of compensation paid to certain officers to no more than $1 million per year. If a non-employee director who received an award under the 1992 Plan later becomes one of such officers and recognizes income attributable to such award while serving as such an officer, Section 162(m) could limit the Company’s deduction. As noted above, however, the Company would be entitled to deductions, in any event, only to the extent that the Company had United States source income.

Recommendation and Required Affirmative Vote

     The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our Ordinary Shares entitled to vote and who do vote (in person or by proxy) at the annual general meeting is required for approval of the proposal to amend the 1992 Plan in accordance with the 1992 Plan Amendments. Our Board has unanimously declared the proposal regarding the 1992 Plan advisable and believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and our members.Accordingly, our Board recommends that you vote FOR approval of the proposal.

2544


PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE NOBLE CORPORATION
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORSINFORMATION

General

           The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2007 information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
             
          Number of securities
          remaining available for
  Number of securities to Weighted-average future issuance under
  be issued upon exercise exercise price of equity compensation plans
  of outstanding options, outstanding options, (excluding securities
Plan Category warrants and rights warrants and rights reflected in column (a))
  (a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  4,397,773  $21.28   5,004,035 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  N/A   N/A   255,504 (1)
             
Total  4,397,773  $21.28   5,259,539 
(1)Consists of shares issuable under the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan and the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
           A description of the material features of the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan and the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors was approved by our Board, without member approval, in 1996,is set forth on pages 35-36 and was amended by our Board, without member approval, in 2002 (as amended, the “Equity Plan”). In February 2005, our Board further amended the Equity Plan, subject to member approval, to be effective as42, respectively, of August 1, 2004 to:

•  increase by 50,000 the aggregate number of Ordinary Shares available for issuance under the Equity Plan; and
•  increase the annual non-employee directors’ retainer fee from $35,000 to $50,000 (collectively, the “Equity Plan Amendments”).

     The Equity Plan would continue to provide that 20 percent of the annual retainer fee will be paid to our non-employee directors in the form of our Ordinary Shares.

     The purpose of the Equity Plan is to enable non-employee directors of the Company to acquire Ordinary Shares, and thereby to align their interests more closely with the interests of the other members of the Company, and to encourage the highest level of director performance by providing the non-employee directors with a more direct interest in the Company’s attainment of its financial goals.

Proposal Regarding the Equity Plan

Equity Plan Amendments. As of January 31, 2005, 46,240 Ordinary Shares remained available for future issuance under the Equity Plan. The Equity Plan Amendments would result in an additional 50,000 Ordinary Shares being available for future issuance under the plan and an increase in the amount of the annual retainer paid to directors from $35,000 to $50,000. Under the terms of the plan, 20 percent of the annual retainer is required to be paid by us in Ordinary Shares; however, directors may elect to apply the balance of the annual retainer to purchase Ordinary Shares. We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as practicable following member approval of the proposal to amend the Equity Plan in accordance with the Equity Plan Amendments to register the additional 50,000 Ordinary Shares available for future issuance under the plan.

     In February 2005, our Board determined, based in part on market analysis performed by an independent compensation consulting firm, that the Equity Plan Amendments described above were appropriate in order to continue to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as non-employee directors of the Company. As a result our Board is proposing the Equity Plan Amendments to our members at the annual general meeting. The Equity Plan Amendments are attached to this proxy statement as Annex D.

     If the Equity Plan Amendments are approved by members, our non-employee directors would receive an annual retainer fee (20 percent of which is required under the Equity Plan to be paid in our Ordinary Shares) of $50,000, rather than $35,000 as is currently specified in the Equity Plan. This change would be effective for annual retainers paid and payable after August 1, 2004. Pursuant to the Equity Plan Amendments, our non-employee directors who are eligible to participate in the Equity Plan would receive additional benefits under the Equity Plan as a result of this change. These increased benefits would include an increase from $7,000 to $10,000 in the value of the portion of the annual retainer fee that is paid to our non-employee directors in the form of Ordinary Shares. This amendment would not apply to any payments of annual retainers under the Equity Plan made prior to August 1, 2004.

26


Description of the Equity Plan

     The material features of the Equity Plan, giving effect to the Equity Plan Amendments, are as described below.

General. The Equity Plan provides for an annual retainer to directors who are not employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. Only non-employee directors are entitled to participate in the Equity Plan. No executive officers or other employees are entitled to participate in the Equity Plan. Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $50,000. Of this amount, (i) $40,000 shall be the cash component of the annual retainer, payable in quarterly installments of $10,000 each at the end of the three-month periods ending on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 (each a “Plan Quarter”) in each year, and (ii) $10,000 shall be the equity component of the annual retainer, payable in Ordinary Shares in one installment at the end of the calendar year (the “Plan Year”). Non-employee directors can elect to have up to 100 percent of the cash component for each quarter applied to purchase Ordinary Shares. A non-employee director who serves in such capacity for less than a Plan Quarter or Plan Year shall have such amount prorated based on the number of days served in such capacity.

     The maximum number of Ordinary Shares issuable under the Equity Plan is 125,000, subject to the adjustment provisions of the plan, of which 96,240 are available for future issuance under the plan. In the event of a dividend payable in Ordinary Shares, split of the Ordinary Shares, Ordinary Share combination, reclassification of the Ordinary Shares, merger or amalgamation in which the Company is the surviving corporation, reorganization or the like, appropriate adjustments will be made in the maximum number of Ordinary Shares subject to the Equity Plan.

Administration. The Equity Plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee is authorized to interpret the Equity Plan, prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Equity Plan, provide for conditions and assurances deemed necessary or advisable to protect the interests of the Company in connection with the Equity Plan, and make all other determinations concerning the Equity Plan.

Voluntary Share Purchase. For any Plan Quarter, a non-employee director may elect to have 100 percent of the cash component of the quarterly amount earned by such director applied to the purchase of Ordinary Shares in accordance with the Equity Plan.

Payment of Retainer. Promptly following the end of each Plan Quarter, the Company pays to each non-employee director the amount of the retainer earned by such person by delivering (i) an amount in cash equal to the amount earned for the quarter less any portion that the non-employee director elected to have applied to the purchase of Ordinary Shares and (ii) a number of Ordinary Shares determined by dividing the portion that the non-employee director elected to have applied to the purchase of Ordinary Shares by the “Current Market Price” of the Ordinary Shares as determined as of the last day of the Plan Quarter in accordance with the provisions of the Equity Plan. Promptly following the end of the Plan Year, the Company pays to each non-employee director such amount earned by such person by delivering to such person the number of Ordinary Shares determined by dividing (x) the amount earned by such person for the Plan Year by (y) the “Current Market Price” of the Ordinary Shares as determined on the last day of the Plan Year in accordance with the provisions of the Equity Plan. Under the Equity Plan, the Current Market Price is generally defined to mean the average of the daily closing prices of the Ordinary Shares for the 15 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the day in question (but not less than the par value of the Ordinary Shares).

Eligibility. Only directors who are not employees of the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliated entities are entitled to participate in the Equity Plan. A non-employee director shall not be entitled to receive an annual retainer under the Equity Plan if such director ceases to serve on our Board by reason of such director’s (i) fraud or intentional misrepresentation or (ii) embezzlement, misappropriation or conversion of assets or opportunities of the Company or any of its affiliates.

Term, Amendment and Termination of the Equity Plan. To the extent permitted by law, our Board may at any time suspend, terminate, amend or modify the Equity Plan. However, no amendment or modification may become effective without the approval of such amendment or modification by the members of the Company if the

27


Company, on the advice of counsel, determines that member approval is necessary or desirable. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, certain amendments of the Equity Plan may not be made without the approval of members.

Recommendation and Required Affirmative Vote

     The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our Ordinary Shares entitled to vote and who do vote (in person or by proxy) at the annual general meeting is required for approval of the proposal to amend the Equity Plan in accordance with the Equity Plan Amendments. Our Board has unanimously declared the proposal regarding the Equity Plan advisable and believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and our members.Accordingly, our Board recommends that you vote FOR approval of the proposal.

statement.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

           Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of ourthe Ordinary Shares, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of such shares. Directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10 percent of ourthe Ordinary Shares are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

           To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the year ended December 31, 2004,2007, our directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10 percent of ourthe Ordinary Shares complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements except as follows: one report of change in ownership following the grant of options and awardawards of restricted sharesRestricted Shares was filed late by each of James C. Day,Julie J. Robertson, Thomas L. Mitchell, Robert D. Campbell and Mark A. Jackson, Danny W. Adkins and Julie J. Robertson.Jackson.

AUDITORS

           The audit committee of the Board has voted unanimously to appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2005,2008, subject to the approval of members. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited our financial statements since 1994. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the annual general meeting to respond to appropriate questions from members, and they will be given the opportunity to make a statement should they desire to do so.Our Board unanimously recommends that members vote FOR the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for 2005.2008.

2845


Report of the AuditCommittee

To the Members of
Noble Corporation:

           The board of directors (the “Board”) of Noble Corporation (the “Company”) maintains an audit committee composed of four non-management directors. The Board has determined that the audit committee’s current membership satisfies the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) that govern audit committees, including the requirements for audit committee member independence set out in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s corporate governance standards and Rule 10A-3 under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

           The audit committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the entire Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The primary responsibilities of the audit committee are to select and retain the Company’s auditors (including review and approval of the terms of engagement and fees), to review with the auditors the Company’s financial reports (and other financial information) provided to the SEC and the investing public, to prepare and publish this report, and to assist the Board with oversight of the following:

  integrity of the Company’s financial statements,
 
  compliance by the Company with standards of business ethics and legal and regulatory requirements,
 
  qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent auditors and
 
  performance of the Company’s independent auditors and internal auditors.

           In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management of the Company.

           The audit committee reviewed and discussed with the independent auditors all communications required by generally accepted auditing standards, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61. In addition, the audit committee has discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the auditors’ independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures below and the letter from the independent auditors required by the Independence Standards Board, Standard No. 1.

           The audit committee discussed with the independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The audit committee meets with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The audit committee held seven20 meetings during 20042007 and met again onJanuary 24,23, 2008, February3 7, 2008 and March3, 2005.February 26, 2008. The number of meetings was greater as compared to historical periods as a result of the previously reported ongoing internal investigation of the Company’s Nigeria operations commissioned by the audit committee in June 2007.

Fees Paid to Independent Auditors

           The following table sets forth the fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services rendered during each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004:2007 (in thousands):
        
 2004 2003         
      2007 2006 
Audit Fees (1) $2,482,000 $917,300  $2,393 $2,569 
Audit-Related Fees (2) 292,521 189,904  25 109 
Tax Fees (3) 978,843 1,328,157  2,803 1,895 
All Other Fees 0 0  0 0 
          
  
Total $3,753,364 $2,435,361  $5,221 $4,573 
          


(1) Represents fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for 20042007 and 20032006 and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on

2946


  Form 10-Q for each of those years and for attestation on management’s assessment of internal controlscontrol for 2004.2007 and 2006.
 
(2) Represents fees for professional services rendered for benefit plan audits for 2007 and certain international projects for 2004 and 2003, SEC S-3 registration statement filing and comment letter process for 2004, and enterprise-wide risk management project and forensic services for 2003.2006.
 
(3) Represents fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance and advisory services and statutory tax reports for Mexico for 20042007 and 2003.2006.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

     Effective January 2003, the audit committee established a policy to pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other fees for services proposed to be rendered by the Company’s independent auditors prior to engagement of the auditors for that service. Consideration and approval of such services for 2004 generally occurred in the regularly scheduled quarterly meetings of the audit committee.

           On January 29, 2004, the audit committee adopted a pre-approval policy framework for audit and non-audit services for 2004, which established that the audit committee’s policy is, each year, to adopt a pre-approval policy framework under which specified audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services may be performed without further specific engagement pre-approval. On February 3, 2005,7, 2008 and February 1, 2007, the audit committee readopted such policy framework for 2005.2008 and 2007, respectively. Under the policy framework, all tax services provided by the independent auditor must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee. Requests or applications to provide services that do require further, separate approval by the audit committee are required to be submitted to the audit committee by both the independent auditors and the chief accounting officer, chief financial officer or controller of the Company, and must include a joint statement that, in their view, the nature or type of service is not a prohibited non-audit service under the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

Summary

           In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to the Board (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20042007 for filing with the SEC. The audit committee also determined that the provision of services other than audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was compatible with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.
   
March 3,2005
February 26, 2008 AUDIT COMMITTEE

Mary P. Ricciardello, Chair
Lawrence J. Chazen
Julie H. Edwards
Jack E. Little
   
 Mary P. Ricciardello, Chair
 Lawrence J. Chazen
Jack E. Little
William A. Sears

3047


MEMBER PROPOSALS AND

OTHER MATTERS

Member Proposals

           Any proposal by a member intended to be presented at the 20062009 annual general meeting of members must be received by the Company at our principal executive offices at 13135 South Dairy Ashford, Suite 800, Sugar Land, Texas 77478, Attention: Julie J. Robertson, SeniorExecutive Vice President – Administration and Secretary, no later than November 15, 2005,26, 2008, for inclusion in our proxy materials relating to that meeting.

           In order for a member to bring other business before an annual general meeting of members, timely notice must be received by our corporate secretary not less than 60 nor more than 120 days in advance of the meeting. The notice must include a description of the proposed item, the reasons the member believes support its position concerning the item, and other information specified in article 34 of the Company’s articles of association. A copy of article 34 is included in Annex BA attached to this proxy statement. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the requirements a member must meet to have a proposal included in our proxy statement. The foregoing time limits also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of rules adopted by the SEC relating to the exercise of discretionary voting authority.

Solicitation of Proxies

           The cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the cost of preparing, printing and mailing the materials used in the solicitation, will be borne by the Company. The Company has retained The Altman Group to aid in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $8,000$7,500 and the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. Proxies may also be solicited by personal interview, telephone and telegram and via the Internet by directors, officers and employees of the Company, who will not receive additional compensation for those services. Arrangements also may be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of Ordinary Shares held by those persons, and the Company will reimburse them for reasonable expenses incurred by them in connection with the forwarding of solicitation materials.

Additional Information about the Company

           You can learn more about the Company and our operations by visiting our website atwww.noblecorp.com. Among other information we have provided there, you will find:

  Our corporate governance guidelines.
 
  The charters of each of our standing committees of the Board.
 
  Our code of business conduct and ethics.
 
  Our memorandum and articles of association.
 
  Information concerning our business and recent news releases and filings with the SEC.
 
  Information concerning our board of directors and member relations.

           Copies of our corporate governance guidelines, the charters of each of our standing committees of the Board and our code of business conduct and ethics are available in print upon request. For additional information about the Company, please refer to our 20042007 Annual Report, which is being mailed with this proxy statement.
   
 NOBLE CORPORATION
   
 James C. DayDavid W. Williams
 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and,
 Chief Executive OfficerPresidentand President
Sugar Land, Texas
March 15,2005

Sugar Land, Texas
March 24, 2008

3148


ANNEX A

AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER
OF THE
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
NOBLE CORPORATION

(Effective as of February 3, 2005)

     This Amended and Restated Charter (this “Charter”) of the Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee” or the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Noble Corporation (the “Corporation”) shall, effective as of February 3, 2005, amend and restate the Amended and Restated Charter of the Audit Committee, which was effective July 24, 2003.

I. PURPOSE

     The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to:

Assist with Board oversight of

•  the integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements,
•  the Corporation’s compliance with standards of business ethics and legal and regulatory requirements,
•  the qualifications and independence of the Corporation’s independent auditors and
•  the performance of the Corporation’s independent auditors and internal auditors; and

Prepare reports of the Committee that are required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to be included in the proxy statement for the Corporation’s annual general meeting of members.

     Consistent with this purpose, the Committee should encourage continuous improvements in the Corporation’s policies, procedures and practices and compliance at all levels. The Committee should also foster open communications among the independent auditors, the Corporations financial and senior management, the internal auditors and the Board. The Committee shall have and may exercise all powers of the Board, except as may be prohibited by law, with respect to all matters encompassed by this Charter, and shall have the power and authority required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Committee will report regularly to the Board regarding the execution of its duties and responsibilities.

     The Committee assists the Board and management in assuring appropriate corporate governance, functioning in an oversight role, recognizing that the Corporation’s management is responsible for preparing the Corporation’s financial statements, and the independent auditors are responsible for auditing those statements. The Committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to the Corporation’s financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent auditor’s work.

II. COMPOSITION

     The Audit Committee shall consist of a minimum of three directors, each of whom shall be appointed by the Board at each annual meeting of the Board following the annual general meeting of the members of the Corporation. Each member of the Audit Committee shall serve until the next such annual meeting of the Board or until his or her successor shall be duly appointed. Unless a Chairperson of the Committee is selected by the full Board, the members of the Committee may designate a Chairperson by majority vote of the entire Committee. The Committee and each of the Committee members shall satisfy the “independence”, expertise, experience and financial literacy requirements applicable to the Committee and its members that are established from time to time by the SEC or the New York Stock Exchange, or in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other applicable laws. The Board shall determine whether at least one member of the Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 401(h)(2) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The existence of such a member, including his or her name and whether or not he or she is independent, shall be disclosed in periodic filings as required by the SEC.

A-1


ANNEX A

III. RESPONSIBILITIES

     The following shall be recurring responsibilities of the Audit Committee in fulfilling its purposes. These responsibilities are set forth as a guide with the understanding that the Committee may diverge from this guide as appropriate.

     1. The Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, retain and terminate the Corporation’s independent auditors. In carrying out this responsibility, the Committee should obtain and review a report from the Corporation’s independent auditors at least annually regarding

•  the auditors’ internal quality control procedures;
•  any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review or peer review of the independent auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the auditors; and
•  any steps taken to deal with any such issues.

     2. Evaluate the independence of the independent auditors, taking into account the opinions of the Corporation’s management and internal auditors. In this regard, the Committee shall obtain periodically from the independent auditors a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the independent auditors and the Corporation, including the matters set forth in Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1. In addition, the Committee shall engage in active dialogue with the independent auditors on all matters that could affect the independence of the auditors. The Committee shall review the experience and qualifications of the lead partner and other senior members of the independent audit team annually to determine that all partner rotation requirements are executed and the Committee shall consider whether there should be a regular rotation of the firm carrying out the audit. The Committee shall have the sole authority with respect to, and shall preapprove, all audit, review or attest engagements and permissible non-audit services, including the fees and terms thereof, to be performed by the independent auditors, subject to, and in compliance with, thede minimisexception for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

     3. Confer with the Corporation’s independent auditors concerning the scope of their audit of the financial statements of the Corporation; provide sufficient opportunity for the independent auditors to meet with the members of the Committee without members of management present; direct the attention of the independent auditors to specific matters or areas deemed by the Committee to be of special significance to the Corporation; and authorize such auditors to perform such supplemental reviews or audits as the Committee may deem necessary or appropriate.

     4. Review with the independent auditor and the internal auditor the adequacy of the Corporation’s system of internal controls, including disclosure controls and procedures and the reliability of its financial reporting systems; confer with the Corporation’s independent auditors and internal auditors with respect to their assessment of the adequacy of such controls and systems; and review management’s response to any material weakness in the Corporation’s internal controls which may be identified; and report to the Board when significant issues exist.

     5. Review the Corporation’s significant accounting principles and policies and significant changes thereto; review proposed and implemented changes in accounting standards and principles which have or may have a material impact on the Corporation’s financial statements; review significant management judgments and accounting estimates used in financial statement preparation, including alternative accounting treatments; and review the accounting for significant corporate transactions.

     6. Review with the independent auditors any disagreements with management or difficulties they may have encountered in performing their audits of the financial statements of the Corporation and managements response.

A-2


ANNEX A

     7. Review with management and the independent auditors the audited financial statements to be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the Corporation’s disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” and review and consider with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 61 (as updated by SAS No. 89 and SAS No. 90), including deficiencies in internal controls, fraud, illegal acts, management judgments and estimates, audit adjustments, audit difficulties, and the independent auditors’ judgments about the quality of the Corporation’s accounting practices, prior to the Corporation’s filing of the Form 10-K with the SEC.

     8. Review with the independent auditors and management the Corporation’s interim financial results to be included in each quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the Corporation’s disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” and any matters required to be discussed by SAS No. 100, prior to the Corporation’s filing of the related Form 10-Q with the SEC.

     9. Review any disclosures that the Corporations chief executive officer and chief financial officer make to the Audit Committee and the independent auditors in connection with the certification process for the Corporations reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q concerning any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting and any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.

     10. Discuss with management the Corporation’s earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance (paying particular attention to any pro forma or adjusted non-generally accepted accounting principle information) provided to the investing public, analysts and rating agencies. This may be done generally (i.e., discussion of the types of information to be disclosed and the type of presentation to be made); the Audit Committee need not discuss in advance each earnings release or each instance in which the Corporation may provide earnings guidance.

     11. Confer separately, periodically, with the director of internal audit, management and the independent auditors as requested by any of them or by the Committee, and at least annually, and review reports they may present with respect to the functioning, quality and adequacy of programs for compliance with the Corporation’s policies and procedures regarding business ethics, compliance with applicable laws and regulations (such as environmental laws and regulations), financial controls and internal auditing, including information regarding violations or probable violations of such policies; and if appropriate conduct further investigations of such violations or probable violations and/or report the foregoing to the Board with such recommendations as the Committee may deem appropriate.

     12. Review with the director of internal audit, at least annually, the activities, budget, staffing and structure of the internal auditing function of the Corporation, and any recommendations of the Committee with respect to improving the performance or strengthening of that function. This includes a periodic review with the director of internal audit of any significant difficulties, disagreements with management or scope restrictions encountered in the course of the internal auditors work.

     13. Prepare reports of the Committee that are required by the rules of the SEC to be included in the proxy statement for the Corporation’s annual general meeting of members, as well as any other reports required by the SEC or the New York Stock Exchange.

     14. Discuss with management the Corporation’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

     15. Set clear policies regarding the hiring by the Corporation of employees or former employees of the independent auditors.

     16. Review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter annually.

     17. Establish procedures for (i) the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; and (ii) the confidential,

A-3


ANNEX A

anonymous submission by employees of the Corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

     18. Review annually the performance of the Committee.

IV. MEETINGS

     The Audit Committee shall meet at least quarterly, and at such other times as the members shall determine to be necessary or appropriate.

V. REPORTING

     The proceedings of all meetings of the Audit Committee will be documented in the minutes, which will be approved by the Committee and presented at meetings of the full Board.

VI. RETENTION OF ADVISORS

     The Committee shall have the authority to engage independent legal counsel and other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties. The Corporation shall provide appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, to engage any such advisors as well as to engage the Corporation’s independent auditors, and for the payment of ordinary and administrative expenses that are necessary or appropriate for carrying out its duties.

A-4


ANNEX B

ARTICLES 34, 54 AND 57
EXCERPTED FROM
THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
OF NOBLE CORPORATION

[Note: One of the purposes of the 2005 annual general meeting of members is to consider and vote upon a special
resolution to amend article 54 to increase the director retirement age to 72 from 70.]

     34In order for business to be properly brought before a general meeting by a Member, the business must be legally proper and written notice thereof must have been filed with the Secretary of the Company not less than 60 nor more than 120 days prior to the meeting. Each such notice shall set forth: (a) the name and address of the Member who intends to make the proposal as the same appear in the CompanysCompany’s records; (b) the class and number of shares of the Company that are owned by such Member; and (c) a clear and concise statement of the proposal and the MembersMember’s reasons for supporting it. The filing of a Member notice as required above shall not, in and of itself, constitute the making of the proposal described therein. If the chairman of the meeting determines that any proposed business has not been properly brought before the meeting, he shall declare such business out of order; and such business shall not be conducted at the meeting.

* * *

     54Each Director shall be at least 21 years of age. A person shall be eligible to be elected a Director of the Company until the annual general meeting of the Company next succeeding such persons 70thperson’s 72nd birthday, and any person serving as a Director on such Directors 70thDirector’s 72nd birthday shall be eligible to complete such DirectorsDirector’s term as such. Directors need not be Members of the Company.

* * *

     57Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of shares having a preference over the Ordinary Shares as to Dividends or upon liquidation, nominations for the election of Directors may be made by the Board of Directors or by any Member entitled to vote for the election of Directors. Any Member entitled to vote for the election of Directors at a meeting may nominate persons for election as Directors only if written notice of such Member’s intent to make such nomination is given, either by personal delivery or by United States mail, postage prepaid, to the Secretary of the Company not later than (a) with respect to an election to be held at an annual general meeting of Members, 90 days in advance of such meeting, and (b) with respect to an election to be held at an extraordinary general meeting of Members for the election of Directors, the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to Members. Each such notice shall set forth: (i) the name and address of the Member who intends to make the nomination of the person or persons to be nominated; (ii) a representation that the Member is a holder of record of shares of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (iii) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the Member and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the Member; (iv) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such Member as would have been required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission had each nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board of Directors; and (v) the consent of each nominee to serve as a Director of the Company if so elected. The chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

B-1


ANNEX C

AMENDED AND RESTATED
NOBLE CORPORATION
1992 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED SHARE PLAN
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

RECITALS

     WHEREAS, Noble Drilling Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Noble-Delaware”), established on December 17, 1992 the Noble Drilling Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors;

     WHEREAS, Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares (the “Company”), has previously assumed such plan (as amended and restated prior to the date hereof, the “Original Plan”) in connection with the corporate restructuring of Noble-Delaware;

     WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the Original Plan to promote the interests of the Company and its members by attracting, retaining and stimulating the performance of qualified non-employee directors by giving them the opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company and an increased personal interest in its continued success and progress;

     WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.01 of the Original Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company may amend the Original Plan;

     WHEREAS, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (which are applicable to the Company) require that certain amendments of equity-compensation plans of listed companies be submitted to members for their approval; and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it is advisable to amend and restate the Original Plan, that such amendment and restatement of the Original Plan is appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its members and that such amendment and restatement shall be submitted to the members of the Company for their approval in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the articles of association of the Company;

     NOW THEREFORE, the Company does hereby amend and restate the Original Plan, subject to member approval, as follows:

ARTICLE I

GENERAL

     1.01Definitions. As used herein the following terms shall have the following meanings:

     (a) “Award Date” means the next business day after each annual general meeting of members of the Company occurring after the Effective Date.

     (b) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

     (c) “Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

     (d) “Company” means Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares, and its successors.

     (e) “Director” means a member of the Board and does not include any person named as a director emeritus pursuant to the articles of association of the Company.

     (f) “Effective Date” means February 4, 2005, the date of adoption of the Plan by the Board, subject to member approval.

C-1


ANNEX C

     (g) “Employee” means any employee of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company within the meaning of Sections 424(e) and (f) of the Code.

     (h) “Fair Market Value” means (1) the average of the closing sales prices of the Ordinary Shares for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date in question, as reported on a national securities exchange (if the Ordinary Shares are listed for trading on such exchange) or as reported of the NASDAQ National Market (if the Ordinary Shares are not listed for trading on a national securities exchange), or (2) if the Ordinary Shares are not listed for trading on a national securities exchange or is not listed as a national market security of NASDAQ or any similar system then in use, then the average of the mean between the bid and asked prices of the Ordinary Shares for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date in question, as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Such closing sales prices shall be appropriately adjusted to take into account any share dividend, split or combination with respect to the Ordinary Shares that occurs within such 10 business day period.

     (i) “Immediate Family Members” means the spouse, former spouse, children (including stepchildren) or grandchildren of an individual.

     (j) “Initial Award” shall have the meaning assigned to such term in Section 3.02(b) hereof.

     (k) “Non-Employee Director” shall mean an individual who (1) is now, or hereafter becomes, a Director by virtue of an election (a) by the members of the Company, or (b) to the extent permitted under applicable law and the articles of association of the Company, by the Board for the purpose of filling a vacancy on the Board resulting from the death, disability, resignation, removal or retirement of a Director or from an increase in the number of persons constituting the entire Board, (2) is neither an Employee nor an officer of the Company (i.e., an individual elected or appointed by the Board or chosen in such other manner as may be prescribed in the articles of association of the Company to serve as such) and (3) has not elected to decline to participate in the Plan with respect to a particular Option or award of Restricted Shares pursuant to Section 1.03 hereof.

     (l) “Option” means any option to purchase Ordinary Shares granted pursuant to the Plan.

     (m) “Optionee” means a Non-Employee Director who has been granted an Option.

     (n) “Option Period” shall have the meaning assigned to such term in Section 3.02(d) hereof.

     (o) “Ordinary Shares” means the Ordinary Shares, par value US$0.10 per share, of the Company.

     (p) “Plan” shall mean this Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as it may be amended from time to time.

     (q) “Restricted Shares” means Ordinary Shares issued or transferred pursuant to Article IV hereof.

     (r) “Vesting Period” shall have the meaning assigned to such term in Section 4.02(d) hereof.

     1.02Options. The Options shall be options that are not qualified as “incentive stock options” under Section 422 of the Code.

     1.03Election to Not Participate in Grants or Awards. A Director otherwise eligible to participate in the Plan may elect to decline to accept any Option or award of Restricted Shares by giving notice thereof to the Company, or (i) in the case of an Option, by refusing to execute a share option agreement relating to such Option, or (ii) in the case of an award of Restricted Shares, by refusing to execute a restricted share agreement relating to such award.

C-2


ANNEX C

ARTICLE II

ADMINISTRATION

     The Plan shall be administered by the Board. The Board shall have no authority, discretion or power to select the Non-Employee Directors who will receive Options or Restricted Shares or to set the number of shares to be covered by each Option or the number of Restricted Shares covered by each award. The Board shall have no authority, discretion or power to set the exercise price or the period within which Options may be exercised, or to alter any other terms or conditions specified herein, except in the sense of administering the Plan subject to the express provisions hereof, including Section 6.01.

     Subject to the foregoing limitations, the Board shall have authority and power to adopt such rules and regulations and to take such action as it shall consider necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, and to construe, interpret and administer the Plan. The decisions of the Board relating to the Plan shall be final and binding upon the Company, the Non-Employee Directors, the Optionees, the holders of Restricted Shares and all other persons. No member of the Board shall incur any liability by reason of any action or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any share option agreement or restricted share agreement entered into pursuant to the Plan.

ARTICLE III

GRANT OF OPTIONS

     3.01Participation. Subject to Section 1.03, each Non-Employee Director shall be granted Options on the terms and conditions herein described.

     3.02Share Option Agreements. Each Option shall be evidenced by a written share option agreement, which agreement shall be entered into by the Company and the Non-Employee Director to whom the Option is granted. Each such agreement shall include, incorporate or conform to the following terms and conditions, and such other terms and conditions not inconsistent therewith or with the terms and conditions of this Plan as the Board considers appropriate in each case:

     (a)Grant. On each Award Date Options shall be granted automatically to each person who is a Non-Employee Director on such date.

     (b)Number. Each Non-Employee Director who begins serving on the Board after the Effective Date shall automatically be granted an Option to purchase 10,000 Ordinary Shares on the first Award Date occurring after such person begins serving (the “Initial Award”). Each Non-Employee Director serving on an Award Date, and who is not entitled to receive an Initial Award on such date in accordance with the preceding sentence, shall automatically be granted, as of such date, an Option to purchase 2,000 Ordinary Shares.

     (c)Price. The exercise price under each Option shall be the Fair Market Value per Ordinary Share on the Award Date of such Option.

     (d)Option Period. Each Option shall be exercisable from time to time over a period (i) commencing upon the earlier of (A) the date that is one year following the Award Date of such Option and (B) the day immediately prior to the date of the next annual general meeting of members occurring following such Award Date, provided that the date of such annual general meeting of members is at least 355 days after such Award Date, and (ii) ending upon the expiration of ten years from such Award Date (the “Option Period”), unless terminated sooner pursuant to the provisions described in Section 3.02(e) below.

     (e)Termination of Services, Death, Etc. Each share option agreement shall provide as follows with respect to the exercise of the Option evidenced thereby in the event that the Optionee ceases to be a Director for the reasons described in this Section 3.02(e):

C-3


ANNEX C

     (i) If the Optionee ceases to be a Director on account of such Optionee’s (a) fraud or intentional misrepresentation, or (b) embezzlement, misappropriation or conversion of assets or opportunities of the Company or any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, then the Option shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect as of the date the Optionee ceases to be a Director;

     (ii) If the Optionee shall die during the Option Period while a Director (or during the additional five-year period provided by paragraph (iii) of this Section 3.02(e)), the Option may be exercised, to the extent that the Optionee was entitled to exercise it at the date of the Optionee’s death, within five years after such death (if otherwise within the Option Period), but not thereafter, by the executor or administrator of the estate of such Optionee, or by the person or persons who shall have acquired the Option directly from the Optionee by bequest or inheritance; or

     (iii) If an Optionee ceases to be a Director for any reason (other than the circumstances specified in paragraphs (i) and (ii) of this Section 3.02(e)) within the Option Period, the Option may be exercised, to the extent the Optionee was able to do so at the date of termination of the directorship, within five years after such termination (if otherwise within the Option Period), but not thereafter.

     (f)Transferability. No Option shall be transferable, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or the rules thereunder, or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined in the Code or Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and may be exercised during the life of the Optionee only by the Optionee, except as otherwise provided herein below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all or a portion of the Options granted to an Optionee may be transferred by such Optionee (i) by gift to the Immediate Family Members of such Optionee, partnerships whose only partners are such Optionee or the Immediate Family Members of such Optionee, limited liability companies whose only shareholders or members are such Optionee or the Immediate Family Members of such Optionee, and trusts established solely for the benefit of such Optionee or the Immediate Family Members of such Optionee, or (ii) to any other persons or entities in the discretion of the Board; provided, that subsequent transfers of transferred Options shall be prohibited except those in accordance with this Section (by will or the laws of descent and distribution). Following transfer, any such Options shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to transfer; provided, that for purposes of the Plan and any share option agreement under the Plan, the term “Optionee” shall be deemed to refer to the transferee. The events of any termination of association set forth in Section 3.02(e) of the Plan and in the share option agreement shall continue to be applied with respect to the original Optionee, following which the transferred Options shall be exercisable by the transferee only to the extent, and for the periods, specified in Section 3.02(e) of the Plan and in the share option agreement.

     (g)Agreement to Continue in Service. Each Optionee shall agree to remain in the service of the Company, at the pleasure of the Company’s members, for a continuous period extending at least through the earlier of (i) the date that is one year following the Award Date of the Option and (ii) the day immediately prior to the date of the next annual general meeting of members occurring following such Award Date, at the retainer rate and fee schedule then in effect or at such changed rate or schedule as the Company from time to time may establish; provided, that nothing in the Plan or in any share option agreement evidencing an Option shall confer upon such Optionee any right to continue as a Director.

     (h)Exercise, Payments, Etc. Each share option agreement between the Company and an Optionee shall provide that the method for exercising the Option evidenced thereby shall be by delivery to the President of the Company by United States registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Company, or by hand delivery, of written notice signed by the Optionee specifying the number Ordinary Shares with respect to which such Option is being exercised. Upon exercise of an Option, the purchase price for the Ordinary Shares purchased shall be paid in full by cash or check; provided, however, that at the request of an Optionee and to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Company shall approve reasonable arrangements with such Optionee and a brokerage firm under which such Optionee may exercise an Option by properly delivering notice of exercise, together with such other documents as the

C-4


ANNEX C

Company shall require, and the Company shall, upon payment in full by cash or check of the purchase price and any other amounts due in respect of such exercise, deliver to such Optionee’s brokerage firm one or more certificates representing Ordinary Shares issued in respect of such exercise.

     Any notice given hereunder shall be deemed to be given on the date on which the same was deposited in a regularly maintained receptacle for the deposit of United States mail, addressed and sent as above-stated, or, in the case of hand delivery, on the date of delivery to the President of the Company. The proceeds of any sale of Ordinary Shares covered by Options shall constitute general funds of the Company. Upon exercise of an Option, the Optionee will be required to pay to the Company the amount of any federal, state or local taxes required by law to be withheld in connection with such exercise.

ARTICLE IV

AWARD OF RESTRICTED SHARES

     4.01Participation. Subject to Section 1.03 hereof, each Non-Employee Director shall be awarded Restricted Shares on the terms and conditions herein described.

     4.02Restricted Share Agreements. Each Restricted Share award shall be evidenced by a written restricted share agreement, which agreement shall be entered into by the Company and the Non-Employee Director to whom Restricted Shares are awarded. Each such agreement shall include, incorporate or conform to the following terms and conditions, and such other terms and conditions not inconsistent therewith or with the terms and conditions of this Plan as the Board considers appropriate in each case:

     (a)Restricted Share Awards. On each Award Date occurring after the Effective Date, Restricted Shares shall be awarded automatically to each person who is a Non-Employee Director on such date; provided, however, that no such award shall be made to a Non-Employee Director in respect of the Award Date on which such director receives the Initial Award.

     (b)Number. Each Non-Employee Director serving on an Award Date, other than any Non-Employee Director who is entitled to receive the Initial Award on such Award Date in accordance with Section 3.02, shall automatically be awarded, as of such date, 4,000 Restricted Shares.

     (c)Price. There shall not be any purchase price charged for any Restricted Shares awarded under the Plan.

     (d)Vesting Period. Each Restricted Share award shall vest one-third per year over three years commencing on the first anniversary of the Award Date (“Vesting Period”), unless terminated sooner pursuant to the provisions described in Section 4.02(g) below. If a Non-Employee Director is awarded Restricted Shares, whether or not escrowed as provided below, the Non-Employee Director shall be the record owner of such Restricted Shares and shall have all the rights of a member with respect to such Restricted Shares (unless the escrow agreement, if any, specifically provides otherwise), including the right to vote and the right to receive dividends or other distributions made or paid with respect to such Restricted Shares.

     (e)Sale, Transferability, Etc. Restricted Shares may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of prior to the date all applicable restrictions lapse.

     (f)Restrictive Legend. Any certificate or certificates representing Restricted Shares shall bear a legend similar to the following:

“The shares represented by this certificate have been issued pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee Directors and may not be sold, assigned, transferred, discounted, exchanged, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of in

C-5


ANNEX C

any manner except as set forth in the terms of the agreement embodying the award of such shares dated ___, 20___.”

     In order to enforce the restrictions, terms and conditions that may be applicable to a Non-Employee Director’s Restricted Shares, the Board may require the Non-Employee Director, upon the receipt of a certificate or certificates representing such Restricted Shares, or at any time thereafter, to deposit such certificate or certificates, together with stock powers and other instruments of transfer, appropriately endorsed in blank, with the Company or an escrow agent designated by the Company under an escrow agreement in such form as by the Board shall prescribe. After the satisfaction of the restrictions, terms and conditions set by the Board at the time of an award of Restricted Shares to a Non-Employee Director, a new certificate, without the legend set forth above, for the number of Ordinary Shares that are no longer subject to such restrictions, terms and conditions shall be delivered to the Non-Employee Director.

     (g)Termination of Service, Death, Etc. Each restricted share agreement shall provide as follows with respect to the award of Restricted Shares in the event that the holder of Restricted Shares ceases to be a Director for the reasons described in this Section 4.02(g):

     (i) If the holder of Restricted Shares ceases to be a Director on account of such holder’s (a) fraud or intentional misrepresentation, or (b) embezzlement, misappropriation or conversion of assets or opportunities of the Company or any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, then any Restricted Shares remaining subject to restrictions shall thereupon be forfeited by the holder and transferred to, and reacquired by, the Company or an Affiliate at no cost to the Company or the affiliate of the Company as of the date the holder ceases to be a Director.

     (ii) The Board shall have the authority (and the restricted share agreement evidencing an award of Restricted Shares may so provide) to cancel all or any portion of any outstanding restrictions prior to the expiration of such restrictions with respect to any or all of the Restricted Shares awarded to a Non-Employee Director hereunder on such terms and conditions as the Board may deem appropriate.

     (iii) If a Non-Employee Director to whom Restricted Shares has been awarded ceases to be a Director, for any reason, prior to the satisfaction of any terms and conditions of an award, any Restricted Shares remaining subject to restrictions shall thereupon be forfeited by the Director and transferred to, and reacquired by, the Company or an affiliate of the Company at no cost to the Company or such affiliate; provided, however, if the cessation is due to the person’s death, retirement or disability, the Board may, in its sole and absolute discretion, deem that the terms and conditions have been met for all or part of such remaining portion.

     (iv) In case of any consolidation, amalgamation or merger of another corporation into the Company in which the Company is the surviving corporation and in which there is a reclassification or change (including a change to the right to receive cash or other property) of the Ordinary Shares (other than a change in par value, or from par value to no par value, or as a result of a subdivision or combination, but including any change in such shares into two or more classes or series of shares), the Board may provide that payment of Restricted Shares shall take the form of the kind and amount of shares of stock and other securities (including those of any new direct or indirect parent of the Company), property, cash or any combination thereof receivable upon such consolidation or merger.

     (v) In the event of any forfeiture of Restricted Shares, the Director holding such shares, or in the event of his or her death, his or her personal representative, shall forthwith deliver to the Secretary of the Company the certificates for the Restricted Shares remaining subject to such restrictions, accompanied by such instruments of transfer, if any, as may reasonably be required by the Secretary of the Company.

C-6


ANNEX C

     (h)No Right to Continue in Service. Nothing in the Plan or in any restricted share agreement evidencing the award of Restricted Shares shall confer upon such holder any right to continue as a Director.

ARTICLE V

AUTHORIZED ORDINARY SHARES

     5.01Ordinary Shares. The total number of Ordinary Shares as to which Options may be granted or Restricted Shares may be awarded shall be 975,000, in the aggregate, except as such number of shares shall be adjusted from and after the Effective Date in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.02 hereof. If any outstanding Option shall expire or be terminated for any reason before the end of the Option Period, the Ordinary Shares allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option shall again be subject to the Plan. If any Restricted Shares are forfeited for any reason before the end of the Vesting Period, the Restricted Shares shall again be subject to the Plan. The Company shall, at all times during the life of any outstanding Options, retain as authorized and unissued Ordinary Shares at least the number of shares from time to time included in the outstanding Options or otherwise assure itself of its ability to perform its obligations under the Plan.

     5.02Adjustments Upon Changes in Ordinary Shares. In the event the Company shall effect a split of the Ordinary Shares or dividend payable in Ordinary Shares, or in the event the outstanding Ordinary Shares shall be combined into a smaller number of shares, the maximum number of shares as to which Options may be granted or Restricted Shares may be awarded shall be increased or decreased proportionately. In the event that before delivery by the Company of all of the Ordinary Shares in respect of which any Option has been granted, the Company shall have effected such a split, dividend or combination, the shares still subject to the Option shall be increased or decreased proportionately and the purchase price per share shall be increased or decreased proportionately so that the aggregate purchase price for all the then optioned shares shall remain the same as immediately prior to such split, dividend or combination.

     In the event of a reclassification of the Ordinary Shares not covered by the foregoing, or in the event of a liquidation, separation or reorganization, including a merger, consolidation or sale of assets, the Board shall make such adjustments, if any, as it may deem appropriate in the maximum number of shares then subject to being optioned or awarded as Restricted Shares and in the number, purchase price and kind of shares covered by the unexercised portions of Options theretofore granted. The provisions of this Section 5.02 shall only be applicable if, and only to the extent that, the application thereof does not conflict with any valid governmental statute, regulation or rule.

     5.03Insufficient Ordinary Shares. If on the Award Date of any Option or Restricted Shares fewer Ordinary Shares remain available for grant or award under the Plan than are necessary to permit the grant of Options and/or the award of Restricted Shares in accordance with the provisions of Sections 3.02 and/or 4.02 hereof, then (i) first, an Option covering an equal number of whole Ordinary Shares, up to 10,000 shares, shall be granted on such date to each Non-Employee Director who is to receive an Initial Award on such date and (ii) second, Options shall be granted and Restricted Shares shall be awarded to the remaining Non-Employee Directors then serving covering, in the aggregate for each such Non-Employee Director, an equal number of whole Ordinary Shares, and all such Options and Restricted Shares so awarded to all such Non-Employee Directors shall cover, in the aggregate, all remaining Ordinary Shares then available for grant or award under the Plan. In the case of clause (ii), for each such Non-Employee Director, the number of Ordinary Shares to be covered by Options and the number of Restricted Shares shall be determined in accordance with the allocation of annual awards between Options and Restricted Shares that would occur if no such deficiency of Ordinary Shares existed.

ARTICLE VI

GENERAL PROVISIONS

     6.01Amendment, Suspension or Termination of Plan. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Section 6.01, the Board may from time to time amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Plan. Nevertheless, no such amendment, modification, suspension or termination shall (a) impair any Options theretofore granted or Restricted

C-7


ANNEX C

Shares awarded, or (b) be made without the approval of the members of the Company where such change would (i) materially increase the total number of Ordinary Shares which may be issued under the Plan (other than as provided in Section 5.02 hereof), (ii) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, (iii) materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the Plan, (iv) have the effect of providing for the grant of options to purchase Ordinary Shares at less than the fair market value per share thereof on the applicable Award Date or (v) require the approval of members under the rules of any securities exchange on which the Ordinary Shares are then listed for trading. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 6.01, the provisions of the Plan governing (A) the number of Ordinary Shares covered by each Option, (B) the exercise price per Ordinary Share under each Option, (C) when and under what circumstances each Option will be granted, (D) the period within which each Option may be exercised or (E) the number of shares in each award of Restricted Shares, shall not be amended more than once every six months, other than to comport with changes in the Code or the rules promulgated thereunder, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the rules promulgated thereunder.

     6.02Effectiveness. This Plan shall become effective as of the Effective Date, subject to and upon the receipt of member approval by the affirmative votes of the holders of a majority of the Ordinary Shares present, or represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting of members duly held in accordance with the applicable laws of the Cayman Islands.

     6.03Paragraph Headings. The paragraph headings included herein are only for convenience, and they shall have no effect on the interpretation of the Plan.

     6.04Gender. Words of any gender used in the Plan shall be construed to include any other gender.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this amendment and restatement of the Plan as of February 4, 2005.
NOBLE CORPORATION
By:  /s/ JAMES C. DAY          
James C. Day 
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer 

C-8


ANNEX D

AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE
NOBLE CORPORATION
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

     WHEREAS, Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares (the “Company”), has previously adopted the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Plan”);

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined that certain amendments to the Plan are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its members; and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the Plan and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (which are applicable to the Company), the Board of Directors has determined to submit such amendments to members for their approval;

     NOW THEREFORE, the Company does hereby amend the Plan, subject to member approval, as follows:

     1. The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan is amended by deleting “Seventy-five thousand (75,000)” in such section and replacing it with “One hundred twenty-five thousand (125,000)”.

     2. Section 5(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place:

     “Quarterly Amounts; Required Share Amount. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, each Outside Director shall be paid an annual retainer for serving as a director of the Company (the “Annual Retainer”). The amount of the Annual Retainer to be paid to each Outside Director for each Plan Year shall be $50,000. Of this amount, (i) $40,000 shall be the cash component of the Annual Retainer, payable in cash in quarterly installments of $10,000 each at the end of each Plan Quarter of the Plan Year (each such quarterly installment being herein referred to as a “Quarterly Amount”), and (ii) $10,000 shall be the equity component of the Annual Retainer, payable in Ordinary Shares in one installment at the end of the Plan Year (the “Required Share Amount”). An Outside Director who serves in such capacity for less than an entire Plan Quarter shall have his Quarterly Amount for such Plan Quarter pro-rated based on his number of days of service as an Outside Director during such Plan Quarter. An Outside Director who serves in such capacity for less than an entire Plan Year shall have his Required Share Amount for such Plan Year pro-rated based on his number of days of service as an Outside Director during such Plan Year.”

     3. This Amendment No. 2 shall amend only those provisions of the Plan set forth herein, and those Sections, paragraphs and sentences not expressly amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.

     4. This Amendment No. 2 shall become effective as of August 1, 2004, subject to and upon the receipt of member approval by the affirmative votes of the holders of a majority of the Ordinary Shares present, or represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting of members duly held in accordance with the applicable laws of the Cayman Islands.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment No. 2 as of February 4, 2005.
NOBLE CORPORATION
By:  /s/ JAMES C. DAY          
James C. Day 
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer 

D-1


THERE ARE THREE WAYS TO DELIVER YOUR PROXY

TELEPHONE
INTERNETMAIL
This method is available for residents of U.S. and Canada. On a touch tone telephone, callTOLL FREE 1-866-437-4651, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You will be asked to enter the CONTROL NUMBER shown below. Have your Proxy Card ready, then follow the prerecorded instructions. Available until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 27, 2005.
Visit the Internet website atwww.myproxyonline.com.Enter the CONTROL NUMBER shown below and follow the instructions on your screen. You will incur only your usual internet charges. Available until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 27, 2005.Simply complete, sign and date your Proxy Card and return it in the postage-paid envelope. If you are delivering your proxy by telephone or the Internet, please do not mail your Proxy Card.

CONTROL NUMBER

A-1



TO DELIVER YOUR PROXY BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE

x           Please mark
votes as in
this example

FORallWITHHOLD
nominees listedAUTHORITY
below (except asto vote for all
marked to thenominees as
contrary below)listed below
Item 1. Election of Directors.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.

LAWRENCE J. CHAZEN, MARY P. RICCIARDELLO AND WILLIAM A. SEARS*
oo

*  Election of Mr. Sears is subject to adoption by Members of the special resolution referenced in Item 2.

(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write the nominee’s name in the space provided below.)

FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 2. Approval of adoption of special resolution of Members to amend articles of association to increase director retirement age.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION.
ooo





FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 3. Approval of the proposal regarding the Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL.
ooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 4. Approval of the proposal to amend the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL.
ooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 5. Approval of the appointment of independent auditors for 2005.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL.
ooo

IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.

Change of address and/or comments? Mark here.o

Date:
, 2005

Signature(s)

Signature(s)

Sign exactly as your name appears hereon. (If shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. If signing as Attorney, Executor, Administrator, Trustee or Guardian, please give your title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign in the full corporate name by duly authorized officer.) Votes must be indicatedx in black or blue ink.



(Please complete, date and sign this proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope.)

 


PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE

(PROXY)

NOBLE CORPORATION

13135 SOUTH DAIRY ASHFORD, SUITE 800
SUGAR LAND, TEXAS 77478
P
R
O
X
Y
PROXY
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors.
     The undersigned, revoking any proxy heretofore given for the Meeting of the Members described below, hereby appoints James C. Day and Mark A. Jackson, and each of them, proxies, with full powers of substitution, to represent the undersigned at the Annual General Meeting of Members of Noble Corporation to be held on April 28, 2005, and at any adjournment thereof, and to vote all shares that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present as follows:
     The shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed herein. IF THIS PROXY IS DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, AND NO VOTING DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN HEREIN, SUCH SHARES WILL BE VOTED “FOR” APPROVAL OF ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of notice of, and the proxy statement for, the aforesaid Annual General Meeting.
(Continued and to be signed and dated on the reverse side)

SEE REVERSE SIDE



 


THERE ARE THREE WAYS TO DELIVER YOUR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

TELEPHONE(PROXY)
INTERNETMAIL
This method is available for residents of U.S. and Canada. On a touch tone telephone, callTOLL FREE 1-866-437-4651, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You will be asked to enter the CONTROL NUMBER shown below. Have your Voting Instruction Card ready, then follow the prerecorded instructions. Available until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 27, 2005.
Visit the Internet website atwww.myproxyonline.com.Enter the CONTROL NUMBER shown below and follow the instructions on your screen. You will incur only your usual internet charges. Available until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 27, 2005.Simply complete, sign and date your Voting Instruction Card and return it in the postage-paid envelope. If you are delivering voting instructions by telephone or the Internet, please do not mail your Voting Instruction Card.

CONTROL NUMBER



TO DELIVER YOUR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD HERE

x           Please mark
votes as in
this example

FORallWITHHOLD
nominees listedAUTHORITY
below (except asto vote for all
marked to thenominees as
contrary below)listed below
Item 1. Election of Directors.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.

LAWRENCE J. CHAZEN, MARY P. RICCIARDELLO AND WILLIAM A. SEARS*
oo

*  Election of Mr. Sears is subject to adoption by Members of the special resolution referenced in Item 2.

(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write the nominee’s name in the space provided below.)

FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 2. Approval of adoption of special resolution of Members to amend articles of association to increase director retirement age.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION.
ooo





FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 3. Approval of the proposal regarding the Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL.
ooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 4. Approval of the proposal to amend the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL.
ooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Item 5. Approval of the appointment of independent auditors for 2005.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL.
ooo

Change of address and/or comments? Mark here.o

Date:
, 2005

Signature(s) of 401(k) Plan Participant

Signature(s) of 401(k) Plan Participant

This voting instruction card should be signed exactly as your name appears hereon.

Voting instructions must be indicatedx in black or blue ink.



(Please complete, date and sign this voting instruction card and return it promptly in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope.)

 


PLEASE DETACH VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD HERE

(PROXY)

NOBLE CORPORATION

13135 SOUTH DAIRY ASHFORD, SUITE 800
SUGAR LAND, TEXAS 77478

VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD FOR ORDINARY SHARES

Voting Instructions Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors.

      The undersigned hereby instructs the trustee to vote, as designated below, all Ordinary Shares of Noble Corporation that are credited to the account(s) of the undersigned (whether or not vested) in the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan at the Annual General Meeting of Members of Noble Corporation to be held on April 28, 2005, and at any adjournment thereof, as more fully described in the notice of the meeting and the proxy statement accompanying the same, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.

      THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD, WHEN DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, WILL BE VOTED BY THE TRUSTEE OF THE NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATION 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN (“401(k) PLAN”) IN THE MANNER DESIGNATED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED 401(k) PLAN PARTICIPANT. IF THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD IS DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, BUT WITHOUT A CLEAR VOTING DESIGNATION, IT WILL BE VOTED “FOR” APPROVAL OF ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5.

(Continued and to be signed and dated on the reverse side)

SEE REVERSE SIDE



 


(PROXY)